public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cl@linux.com (Christoph Lameter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-next][regression] [PATCH] percpu: add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:54:06 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1403181053110.23935@nuc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53286ABF.3040408@ti.com>

On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Grygorii Strashko wrote:

> Any way, I can boot and console works fine with your change :)
> Thanks.

Ok here is the properly formatted patch:


Subject: preemption_checks: Avoid snprintf before checking error conditions

snprintf can cause hangs. Move the string processing into the function
so that the string operations only occur when necessary after the
conditions have been checked.

Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>



Index: linux/lib/smp_processor_id.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/lib/smp_processor_id.c	2014-03-18 09:36:31.330450525 -0500
+++ linux/lib/smp_processor_id.c	2014-03-18 09:36:37.822315534 -0500
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
 #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>

-notrace static unsigned int check_preemption_disabled(char *what)
+notrace static unsigned int check_preemption_disabled(const char *what1,
+							const char *what2)
 {
 	int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();

@@ -38,8 +39,8 @@
 	if (!printk_ratelimit())
 		goto out_enable;

-	printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: using %s in preemptible [%08x] code: %s/%d\n",
-		what, preempt_count() - 1, current->comm, current->pid);
+	printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: using %s%s() in preemptible [%08x] code: %s/%d\n",
+		what1, what2, preempt_count() - 1, current->comm, current->pid);

 	print_symbol("caller is %s\n", (long)__builtin_return_address(0));
 	dump_stack();
@@ -52,15 +53,12 @@

 notrace unsigned int debug_smp_processor_id(void)
 {
-	return check_preemption_disabled("smp_processor_id()");
+	return check_preemption_disabled("smp_processor_id","");
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(debug_smp_processor_id);

 notrace void __this_cpu_preempt_check(const char *op)
 {
-	char text[40];
-
-	snprintf(text, sizeof(text), "__this_cpu_%s()", op);
-	check_preemption_disabled(text);
+	check_preemption_disabled("__this_cpu_", op);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__this_cpu_preempt_check);

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-18 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-18 15:01 [linux-next][regression] [PATCH] percpu: add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops Grygorii Strashko
2014-03-18 14:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2014-03-18 15:48   ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-03-18 15:54     ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2014-03-18 21:37       ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-19 11:18         ` Grygorii Strashko
2014-03-20 14:06         ` Christoph Lameter
     [not found] ` <534C182C.8040206@ti.com>
2014-04-14 17:12   ` [3.15-rc1] a huge number of warnings produced by xhci & Christoph Lameter
2014-04-15 10:00     ` Grygorii Strashko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1403181053110.23935@nuc \
    --to=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox