public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: fix regression in ixp4xx clocksource
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:09:59 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1106020100200.3078@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110601225826.GR3660@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

Russell,

On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:43:07AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > Commit 234b6ceddb4fc2a4bc5b9a7670f070f6e69e0868
> > 
> >    clocksource: convert ARM 32-bit up counting clocksources
> > 
> > broke the build for ixp4xx and made big endian operation impossible.
> > This commit restores the original behaviour.
> 
> I'm really not happy about using the MMIO clocksource stuff with random
> other read functions like this - it defeats the entire purpose of the
> MMIO clocksource stuff.  Maybe we should just undo the change for IXP4xx
> and treat it as "special" for the time being.
> 
> Thomas - do you have any other views?

I have no objections to have special cased read functions as long as
all the other copied code is gone. We have the same problem with the
generic irq chip and I did not come up with a good decision function
where to draw the line. As for everything we come up with in the
consolidation space we need to apply common sense and keep an eye on
the real abusers.

Though in the mmio clocksource case we might ask the question whether
read[l|w]() is really necessary in the generic implemetation or
not. [too tired to answer that now ]
 
Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-01 23:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-30  8:43 [PATCH] arm: fix regression in ixp4xx clocksource Richard Cochran
2011-06-01 15:08 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2011-06-01 17:02   ` Richard Cochran
2011-06-06  8:43     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2011-06-01 22:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-01 23:09   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-07-04  9:21     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-07  6:59       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2011-06-11  5:15   ` Richard Cochran
2011-06-11 11:22     ` Mikael Pettersson
2011-06-11 12:49       ` Richard Cochran
2011-06-11 13:18         ` Mikael Pettersson
2011-06-26 13:08       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2011-06-12 13:51     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-13  5:58       ` Richard Cochran
2011-06-26 13:38 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2011-06-28 13:10   ` Richard Cochran
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-06 21:02 [PATCH] ARM: fix regression in IXP4xx clocksource Krzysztof Halasa
2011-07-06 21:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-07  7:06   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2011-07-12  8:05 ` Richard Cochran
2011-07-12  8:32   ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1106020100200.3078@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox