public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fthain@telegraphics.com.au (Finn Thain)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/12] scsi/NCR5380: fix debugging macros and #include structure
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:14:22 +1100 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1403190925550.6652@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395148051.2812.51.camel@joe-AO722>


On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 13:55 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> > 
> > #define dprintk(flg, fmt, ...) no_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> 
> Fine, but with a correction.
> 
> no_printk keeps all side effects like performing any function calls made 
> by the statement or accessing any volatiles.
> 
> Using
> 
> do { if (0) no_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
> 
> does not have any side-effects.

I take your point about having the compiler check arguments when
NDEBUG & flg == 0.

As for side-effects, chip register accesses would be affected if dprintk() 
expanded to no_printk() when NDEBUG & flg == 0.

E.g. NCR5380.c line 1213:
dprintk(NDEBUG_INTR, "scsi : unknown interrupt, BASR 0x%X, MR 0x%X, SR 0x%x\n",
                     basr, NCR5380_read(MODE_REG), NCR5380_read(STATUS_REG));

I don't want to re-introduce side-effects into a dozen different NCR5380 
drivers on three different architectures when I can test only one of those 
drivers. It's difficult to get good code coverage even for one driver.

-- 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-18 23:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20140318002822.372705594@telegraphics.com.au>
2014-03-18  3:19 ` [PATCH 00/12] scsi/NCR5380: fix debugging macros and #include structure Joe Perches
2014-03-18 12:00   ` Finn Thain
2014-03-18 12:45     ` Joe Perches
2014-03-18 12:55       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-18 13:07         ` Joe Perches
2014-03-18 13:13           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-18 13:20             ` Joe Perches
2014-03-18 23:14           ` Finn Thain [this message]
2014-03-19  0:47             ` Joe Perches
2014-03-19  1:46               ` Finn Thain
2014-03-19  1:54                 ` Joe Perches
2014-03-18  0:42 Finn Thain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1403190925550.6652@nippy.intranet \
    --to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox