From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, gshan@redhat.com,
kernel-dev@igalia.com, kernel@gpiccoli.net,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Ryan Houdek <sonicadvance1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/kernel: Expose the running CPU of a native task in TPIDRRO_EL0
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 10:51:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoGIEEje1NIMTjyv@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260815152759.2046231-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com>
On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 12:19:32PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> The register TPIDRRO_EL0 has 2 meanings / usages today, depending on
> the mode userspace is running:
>
> - For native/arm64 mode, this register is always 0 from the userspace
> perspective. In the kernel, it is used during ventry (entry.S) as
> a scratch register, related to KPTI (stashes x30 in fact).
>
> - For 32-bit compat tasks, this register holds the TLS userspace pointer,
> and is not used for KPTI or anything else in entry.S. This is ABI and
> userspace can count on having a valid TLS pointer there.
>
> Happens that other operating systems follow a similar approach than 32-bit
> compat mode, even for arm64: in both Windows[0] and MacOS (xnu/darwin)[1],
> this register is used to hold the running CPU of the current task, hence
> offering a very fast / non-syscall way for a given task to figure its
> running CPU id.
I don't think we should allocate TPIDRRO_EL0 for this as it precludes us
using it for anything else in the future. If you want the current CPU,
then I think you're better off using either rseq (which I thought could
do this) or looking at reviving the vDSO work you mention (but that has
unresolved limitations iirc).
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-16 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-15 15:19 [PATCH] arm64/kernel: Expose the running CPU of a native task in TPIDRRO_EL0 Guilherme G. Piccoli
2026-08-15 16:52 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-08-17 14:51 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2026-08-17 14:56 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-08-16 9:51 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2026-08-17 8:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-08-17 12:53 ` Ryan Houdek
2026-08-17 14:48 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aoGIEEje1NIMTjyv@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=kernel@gpiccoli.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sonicadvance1@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox