From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>,
<joro@8bytes.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>, <praan@google.com>,
<kevin.tian@intel.com>, <kees@kernel.org>, <smostafa@google.com>,
<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<skaestle@nvidia.com>, <mmarrid@nvidia.com>,
<skolothumtho@nvidia.com>, <bbiber@nvidia.com>,
<harsha.v@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable PRI for PCI device in arm_smmu_probe_device()
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 22:53:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apuuV04NRqljXnIK@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178846311320.1308030.2192800704181905560.b4-review@b4>
On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 12:18:33PM -0700, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > SMMUv3 forbids the Stall model on PCIe streams. Refuse to enable PRI on a
> > PCIe master that came with stall_enabled, so page_response() can dispatch
> > on master state unambiguously.
>
> As earlier, we have exceptions in tree for Stall mode on PCIe streams
> (lets not reopen that fun arguement) so I'd focus this on PRI not
> making any sense if stall mode is in use as that has alternative
> handling for page faults.
Replaced with:
A stalling master resolves its faults synchronously, so it has no reason at
all to issue a page request. Refuse to enable PRI on such a master, so that
page_response() can keep dispatching on the master state unambiguously.
> > + /* Same as the eventq drain above, for the hardware priq */
> > + if (master->pri_enabled) {
> > + ret |= arm_smmu_drain_queue(smmu, &smmu->priq.q, false);
> > + /* Ensure pending requests have reached the IOPF queue */
> > + if (!ret && smmu->priq.q.irq)
>
> Similar to before, I'd factor out the if (!ret)
> Using |= on return values is never particularly nice though safe
> as used here. Still I'd use another variable to store that things
> timed out already so we are skipping these.
OK. Replaced with a "bool timed_out" (in both PATCH-4 and here):
@@ void arm_smmu_attach_release(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state)
struct arm_smmu_master_domain *master_domain = state->old_master_domain;
struct arm_smmu_master *master = state->master;
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
- int ret = 0;
+ bool timed_out = false;
lockdep_assert_not_held(&arm_smmu_asid_lock);
iommu_group_mutex_assert(master->dev);
@@ void arm_smmu_attach_release(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state)
* against the next domain.
*/
if (master->stall_enabled) {
- ret = arm_smmu_wait_for_queue_drained(smmu, &smmu->evtq.q, false);
+ timed_out = arm_smmu_wait_for_queue_drained(smmu, &smmu->evtq.q,
+ false);
/*
* Ensure pending events have reached the IOPF queue, unless
* the drain timed out: a stuck consumer would also block an
* unbounded wait_event() inside the synchronize_irq().
*/
- if (!ret) {
+ if (!timed_out) {
if (smmu->evtq.q.irq)
synchronize_irq(smmu->evtq.q.irq);
/* Pending events might be in the combined_irq handler */
@@ void arm_smmu_attach_release(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state)
/* Same as the eventq drain above, for the hardware priq */
if (master->pri_enabled) {
- ret |= arm_smmu_wait_for_queue_drained(smmu, &smmu->priq.q, false);
+ timed_out |= arm_smmu_wait_for_queue_drained(
+ smmu, &smmu->priq.q, false);
/* Ensure pending requests have reached the IOPF queue */
- if (!ret) {
+ if (!timed_out) {
if (smmu->priq.q.irq)
synchronize_irq(smmu->priq.q.irq);
/* Pending requests might be in the combined_irq handler */
@@ void arm_smmu_attach_release(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state)
* such work still references. Skip the iopf teardown and
* leak master_domain, rather than risk a UAF.
*/
- if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
+ if (WARN_ON(timed_out)) {
state->old_master_domain = NULL;
return;
}
> > + if (!pci_pri_supported(pdev))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* SMMUv3 forbids the Stall model on PCIe streams */
>
> Again, I'd tweak the wording given we have quite a few examples
> in tree that do stall mode on PCIe smelling streams.
Replaced with:
/* A stalling master resolves its faults without any page request */
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-05 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 0:33 [PATCH v3 00/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add PRI support Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_attach_release() Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-04 20:16 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add Q_POS() macro Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drain in-flight fault events on domain detach Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-04 14:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-04 22:57 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-04 21:42 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Flush in-flight fault work " Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-05 0:54 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate IOPF queue without FEAT_SVA Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Submit CMDQ_OP_PRI_RESP for IOPF event Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-05 1:15 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Disable the queue IRQs before disabling the SMMU Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-05 3:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Disable PRI when no IRQ handler is registered Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-04 14:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support PRI Page Request in arm_smmu_handle_ppr() Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-05 5:08 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate IOPF queue for ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] PCI/ATS: Add PRI stubs Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] PCI/ATS: Export pci_enable_pri() and pci_reset_pri() Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-01 0:33 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable PRI for PCI device in arm_smmu_probe_device() Nicolin Chen
2026-09-03 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-05 5:53 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-09-03 19:18 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add PRI support Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-04 14:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apuuV04NRqljXnIK@nvidia.com \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bbiber@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=harsha.v@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skaestle@nvidia.com \
--cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox