From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
To: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Keir Fraser <keirf@google.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Hiroyuki Katsura <hk590@cam.ac.uk>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Fix host access to the EL2 stacks
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 14:04:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqAHw8Is0bNBbXUl@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908110713.1540304-1-fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 12:07:09PM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The per-CPU EL2 stacks are initialised as host-owned after pKVM init.
> fix_host_ownership() walks only the linear-map alias of each memblock
> region, and the stacks, mapped in the private VA range for their guard
> pages, have none.
>
> Patch 1 is the fix, and it needs none of the other three. Patch 4 adds
> the check that would have caught it and would catch similar instances
> in the future: once the transfer is done, walk the private VA range and
> fail init unless every valid leaf is hyp-owned, or is hyp text mapped
> without write access.
>
> Patch 2 is a fix in its own right, but to a different bug.
> fix_host_ownership_walker() matches hyp text on its stage-1 permissions,
> and that test hasn't matched on a non-hVHE host since 7.0, so hyp text
> is donated there rather than left read-only. Nothing crashes, but the
> instruction dump on hyp panic reads a page the host can't access, so
> the Code: line comes out as question marks. It matches by physical
> address instead, which is what patch 4 needs too. Patch 3 splits the
> start of the range from the allocation cursor, with no functional
> change, so patch 4 knows where the range begins.
>
> Based on Linux 7.3-rc2 (df2908090cda3).
>
> Cheers,
> /fuad
>
> Fuad Tabba (4):
> KVM: arm64: Transfer the hyp stack pages out of the host stage-2
> KVM: arm64: Match hyp text by physical address in fix_host_ownership()
> KVM: arm64: Move the private VA allocation cursor to __io_map_next
> KVM: arm64: Check every private mapping is hyp-owned at pKVM init
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c | 20 +++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/setup.c | 16 +++-
> 5 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: df2908090cda368b01ff43709f51890076c56157
> --
> 2.39.5
>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
--
Vincent
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 11:07 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Fix host access to the EL2 stacks Fuad Tabba
2026-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: arm64: Transfer the hyp stack pages out of the host stage-2 Fuad Tabba
2026-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm64: Match hyp text by physical address in fix_host_ownership() Fuad Tabba
2026-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: arm64: Move the private VA allocation cursor to __io_map_next Fuad Tabba
2026-09-08 11:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: arm64: Check every private mapping is hyp-owned at pKVM init Fuad Tabba
2026-09-08 12:53 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm64: Fix host access to the EL2 stacks Marc Zyngier
2026-09-08 13:04 ` Vincent Donnefort [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqAHw8Is0bNBbXUl@google.com \
--to=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=hk590@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox