From: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>
To: Tian Zheng <zhengtian10@huawei.com>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras@arm.com>,
maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, pbonzini@redhat.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, wangzhou1@hisilicon.com,
yangjinqian1@huawei.com, caijian11@h-partners.com,
liuyonglong@huawei.com, tangchengchang@huawei.com,
yezhenyu2@huawei.com, yubihong@huawei.com, linuxarm@huawei.com,
joey.gouly@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, fuad.tabba@linux.dev,
mark.rutland@arm.com, seanjc@google.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/15] KVM: arm64: Flush the HDBSS buffer on VM exit
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 18:13:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auDpyRNpeDNzIk3W@LeoBrasDK> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929103655.85107-9-zhengtian10@huawei.com>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 06:36:48PM +0800, Tian Zheng wrote:
> From: Eillon <yezhenyu2@huawei.com>
>
> HDBSS entries accumulate in the per-vCPU buffer while the guest runs,
> and must be drained into the dirty bitmap or dirty ring before
> userspace can observe them.
>
> Drain the buffer at a single point: kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() flushes
> it on every VM exit, before the exit reason is handled. Flushing
> inside the run loop keeps the dirty-ring feedback timely: when a flush
> pushes the ring past its soft limit, kvm_dirty_ring_push() raises
> KVM_REQ_DIRTY_RING_SOFT_FULL, which check_vcpu_requests() observes at
> the top of the next loop iteration, so the vCPU exits to userspace for
> the harvest before re-entering the guest.
>
> kvm_arch_sync_dirty_log() relies on the exit path to flush: it kicks
> vCPUs out of guest mode, and the GET/CLEAR protocol tolerates
> concurrent bitmap writes, so the snapshot is complete without extra
> synchronization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eillon <yezhenyu2@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tian Zheng <zhengtian10@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h | 15 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 20 ++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h
> index fe703f02626b..d828e6b43fe9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_dirty_bit.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
> #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
>
> +#define HDBSS_ENTRY_VALID BIT(0)
> +#define HDBSS_ENTRY_IPA GENMASK_ULL(55, 12)
> +
> #define KVM_ARM_HDBSS_DEFAULT_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
> #define KVM_ARM_HDBSS_MAX_SIZE SZ_2M
>
> @@ -22,7 +25,19 @@ static inline u32 kvm_hdbss_buffer_size(struct kvm *kvm)
> return kvm->arch.hdbss_buffer_size ?: KVM_ARM_HDBSS_DEFAULT_SIZE;
> }
>
> +static inline bool kvm_hdbss_enabled(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + return kvm->arch.mmu.vtcr & VTCR_EL2_HDBSS;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool vcpu_hdbss_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return vcpu->arch.hw_mmu &&
> + (vcpu->arch.hw_mmu->vtcr & VTCR_EL2_HDBSS);
> +}
> +
IIUC, arch.mmu is always the canonical s2_mmu, while hw_mmu can be the
nested s2_mmu, if enabled.
Was that your intend here?
If not, we could use only kvm* version, which can be called with vcpu->kvm.
If it was, then I would like to understand the logic here, as IIUC the
buffer is accessible only for the non-nested guest, as it's
allocated in a per-vcpu structure. (vcpu->arch)
> int kvm_arm_vcpu_alloc_hdbss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_arm_vcpu_free_hdbss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +void kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>
> #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_DIRTY_BIT_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 5ea4ac26995e..9d7bdece149a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -1430,6 +1430,14 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> trace_kvm_exit(ret, kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu), *vcpu_pc(vcpu));
>
> + /*
> + * Drain the HDBSS buffer before the exit is handled, so
> + * entries pushed to the dirty ring are accounted for by
> + * dirty_ring_check_request() on the next iteration.
> + */
> + if (vcpu_hdbss_enabled(vcpu))
> + kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer(vcpu);
> +
> /* Exit types that need handling before we can be preempted */
> handle_exit_early(vcpu, ret);
>
looks the correct place, haven't looked too much on that, though.
> @@ -2017,7 +2025,19 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_unlocked_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl,
>
> void kvm_arch_sync_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
> {
> + unsigned long i;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>
> + if (!kvm_hdbss_enabled(kvm))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * The buffer is drained on every VM exit, so kicking running
> + * vCPUs is enough to flush them; the dirty-log GET/CLEAR
> + * protocol tolerates bits set concurrently with the snapshot.
> + */
> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> + kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> }
>
> static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_device_addr(struct kvm *kvm,
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c
> index f9aeb9f34ad0..be0d12555c84 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/dirty_bit.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/kconfig.h>
> #include <linux/log2.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/srcu.h>
>
Out of curiosity, could you please explain you reasoning on selecting srcu
as locking here?
(Like, what are you protecting against, and why srcu is a good choice)
> int kvm_arm_vcpu_alloc_hdbss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> @@ -53,3 +54,47 @@ void kvm_arm_vcpu_free_hdbss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vcpu->arch.hdbss.hdbss_pg = NULL;
> vcpu->arch.hdbss.hdbssbr_el2 = 0;
> }
> +
> +void kvm_flush_hdbss_buffer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + int idx, curr_idx;
> + u64 prod;
> + u32 entries;
> + u64 *hdbss_buf;
> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> + int srcu_idx;
> +
> + if (!vcpu_hdbss_enabled(vcpu))
> + return;
You test this before calling, is it really necessary to test it again, just
after calling?
> +
> + prod = read_sysreg_s(SYS_HDBSSPROD_EL2);
> + curr_idx = HDBSSPROD_IDX(prod);
> +
> + if (curr_idx == 0 || !vcpu->arch.hdbss.hdbss_pg)
> + return;
> +
> + hdbss_buf = page_address(vcpu->arch.hdbss.hdbss_pg);
> + if (!hdbss_buf)
> + return;
> +
> + entries = kvm_hdbss_buffer_size(kvm) / sizeof(u64);
> +
> + /* kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty() resolves the memslot under SRCU. */
> + srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> + for (idx = 0; idx < min_t(u32, curr_idx, entries); idx++) {
> + u64 gpa;
> +
> + gpa = hdbss_buf[idx];
> + if (!(gpa & HDBSS_ENTRY_VALID))
> + continue;
> +
> + gpa &= HDBSS_ENTRY_IPA;
> + kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(vcpu, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + }
> + srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, srcu_idx);
> +
> + prod &= ~HDBSSPROD_EL2_INDEX_MASK;
> + write_sysreg_s(prod, SYS_HDBSSPROD_EL2);
> + vcpu->arch.hdbss.hdbssprod_el2 = prod;
> + isb();
> +}
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Thanks!
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 10:36 [PATCH v5 00/15] KVM: arm64: FEAT_HDBSS support for stage-2 dirty tracking Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] KVM: arm64: pgtables: Change write bit from S2AP_W to DBM Tian Zheng
2026-09-30 0:25 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-30 2:44 ` Tian Zheng
2026-10-26 15:02 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DIRTY Tian Zheng
2026-09-30 0:35 ` Oliver Upton
2026-09-30 2:57 ` Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] KVM: arm64: Introduce a dedicated walker for stage2 write-protect Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_REQ_RELOAD_STAGE2 Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] KVM: arm64: Harvest stage-2 dirty state into the host folio account Tian Zheng
2026-10-26 18:05 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_HDBSS Tian Zheng
2026-10-26 18:12 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] KVM: arm64: Add HDBSS per-vCPU buffer management Tian Zheng
2026-10-26 18:27 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] KVM: arm64: Flush the HDBSS buffer on VM exit Tian Zheng
2026-10-27 18:13 ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] KVM: arm64: Handle HDBSS faults Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] KVM: Add kvm_arch_dirty_ring_size_updated() hook Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] KVM: arm64: Reserve dirty ring space for the HDBSS buffer Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] KVM: arm64: Derive the VM hardware dirty mode from dirty logging Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] KVM: arm64: Add HDBSS buffer size ioctl for dirty-bitmap mode Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] KVM: arm64: Document HDBSS buffer size ioctl Tian Zheng
2026-09-29 10:36 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add HDBSS buffer size ioctl interface test Tian Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auDpyRNpeDNzIk3W@LeoBrasDK \
--to=leo.bras@arm.com \
--cc=caijian11@h-partners.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tangchengchang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangjinqian1@huawei.com \
--cc=yezhenyu2@huawei.com \
--cc=yubihong@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengtian10@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox