linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: perf: arm_pmuv3: Update 'pmc_width' based on actual HW event width
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:38:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9f1c76e-5f39-448a-8f07-19f5b4e65e72@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009043724.175100-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

On 09/10/2023 5:37 am, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This updates 'perf_event_mmap_page->pmc_width' based on actual HW event's
> width that are currently missing i.e ARMPMU_EVT_63BIT and ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT.
> 
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> This applies on v6.6-rc5.
> 
>   drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
> index fe4db1831662..94723d00548e 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
> @@ -1375,6 +1375,10 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event,
>   	if (userpg->cap_user_rdpmc) {
>   		if (event->hw.flags & ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT)
>   			userpg->pmc_width = 64;
> +		else if (event->hw.flags & ARMPMU_EVT_63BIT)
> +			userpg->pmc_width = 63;
> +		else if (event->hw.flags & ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT)
> +			userpg->pmc_width = 47;

I think this will give the wrong behaviour in at least some cases - if 
the user has not requested a "long" event which would lead to 
ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT being set, we will bias the values to only count 32 
effective bits regardless of how wide the physical counters are. I 
believe this is what "the valid width of the counter" in the 
documentation is trying to refer to.

Thanks,
Robin.

>   		else
>   			userpg->pmc_width = 32;
>   	}

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-10 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-09  4:37 [PATCH] drivers: perf: arm_pmuv3: Update 'pmc_width' based on actual HW event width Anshuman Khandual
2023-10-09  9:43 ` James Clark
2023-10-10  3:03   ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-10-10  8:28     ` James Clark
2023-10-10  8:30       ` James Clark
2023-10-10 11:38 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2023-10-12  9:05 ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c9f1c76e-5f39-448a-8f07-19f5b4e65e72@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).