From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: perf: arm_pmuv3: Update 'pmc_width' based on actual HW event width
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:38:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9f1c76e-5f39-448a-8f07-19f5b4e65e72@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009043724.175100-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On 09/10/2023 5:37 am, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This updates 'perf_event_mmap_page->pmc_width' based on actual HW event's
> width that are currently missing i.e ARMPMU_EVT_63BIT and ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT.
>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> This applies on v6.6-rc5.
>
> drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
> index fe4db1831662..94723d00548e 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
> @@ -1375,6 +1375,10 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event,
> if (userpg->cap_user_rdpmc) {
> if (event->hw.flags & ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT)
> userpg->pmc_width = 64;
> + else if (event->hw.flags & ARMPMU_EVT_63BIT)
> + userpg->pmc_width = 63;
> + else if (event->hw.flags & ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT)
> + userpg->pmc_width = 47;
I think this will give the wrong behaviour in at least some cases - if
the user has not requested a "long" event which would lead to
ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT being set, we will bias the values to only count 32
effective bits regardless of how wide the physical counters are. I
believe this is what "the valid width of the counter" in the
documentation is trying to refer to.
Thanks,
Robin.
> else
> userpg->pmc_width = 32;
> }
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-10 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-09 4:37 [PATCH] drivers: perf: arm_pmuv3: Update 'pmc_width' based on actual HW event width Anshuman Khandual
2023-10-09 9:43 ` James Clark
2023-10-10 3:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-10-10 8:28 ` James Clark
2023-10-10 8:30 ` James Clark
2023-10-10 11:38 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2023-10-12 9:05 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c9f1c76e-5f39-448a-8f07-19f5b4e65e72@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).