From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: Shuijing Li <shuijing.li@mediatek.com>,
chunkuang.hu@kernel.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
jitao.shi@mediatek.com
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mediatek: dsi: Correct calculation formula of PHY Timing
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:15:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d295a448-1b50-47be-92a2-770501c83e18@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240315072945.19502-1-shuijing.li@mediatek.com>
Il 15/03/24 08:29, Shuijing Li ha scritto:
> This patch correct calculation formula of PHY timing.
> Make actual phy timing more accurate.
>
More accurate in which cases? By how much? On which SoC(s)?
I agree about those changes if those are improving the PHY timing, but
can you please document what's going on?
Thanks,
Angelo
> Signed-off-by: Shuijing Li <shuijing.li@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 33 +++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> index a2fdfc8ddb15..d1bd7d671880 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -235,22 +235,23 @@ static void mtk_dsi_phy_timconfig(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> u32 data_rate_mhz = DIV_ROUND_UP(dsi->data_rate, 1000000);
> struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
>
> - timing->lpx = (60 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000)) + 1;
> - timing->da_hs_prepare = (80 * data_rate_mhz + 4 * 1000) / 8000;
> - timing->da_hs_zero = (170 * data_rate_mhz + 10 * 1000) / 8000 + 1 -
> - timing->da_hs_prepare;
> - timing->da_hs_trail = timing->da_hs_prepare + 1;
> -
> - timing->ta_go = 4 * timing->lpx - 2;
> - timing->ta_sure = timing->lpx + 2;
> - timing->ta_get = 4 * timing->lpx;
> - timing->da_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx + 1;
> -
> - timing->clk_hs_prepare = 70 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000);
> - timing->clk_hs_post = timing->clk_hs_prepare + 8;
> - timing->clk_hs_trail = timing->clk_hs_prepare;
> - timing->clk_hs_zero = timing->clk_hs_trail * 4;
> - timing->clk_hs_exit = 2 * timing->clk_hs_trail;
> + timing->lpx = (80 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000)) + 1;
> + timing->da_hs_prepare = (59 * data_rate_mhz + 4 * 1000) / 8000 + 1;
> + timing->da_hs_zero = (163 * data_rate_mhz + 11 * 1000) / 8000 + 1 -
> + timing->da_hs_prepare;
> + timing->da_hs_trail = (78 * data_rate_mhz + 7 * 1000) / 8000 + 1;
> +
> + timing->ta_go = 4 * timing->lpx;
> + timing->ta_sure = 3 * timing->lpx / 2;
> + timing->ta_get = 5 * timing->lpx;
> + timing->da_hs_exit = (118 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000)) + 1;
> +
> + timing->clk_hs_prepare = (57 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000)) + 1;
> + timing->clk_hs_post = (65 * data_rate_mhz + 53 * 1000) / 8000 + 1;
> + timing->clk_hs_trail = (78 * data_rate_mhz + 7 * 1000) / 8000 + 1;
> + timing->clk_hs_zero = (330 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000)) + 1 -
> + timing->clk_hs_prepare;
> + timing->clk_hs_exit = (118 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000)) + 1;
>
> timcon0 = timing->lpx | timing->da_hs_prepare << 8 |
> timing->da_hs_zero << 16 | timing->da_hs_trail << 24;
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-15 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-15 7:29 [PATCH] mediatek: dsi: Correct calculation formula of PHY Timing Shuijing Li
2024-03-15 9:15 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [this message]
2024-03-20 6:28 ` CK Hu (胡俊光)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d295a448-1b50-47be-92a2-770501c83e18@collabora.com \
--to=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jitao.shi@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shuijing.li@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox