public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Subject: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Report IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY even betterer
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 16:51:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6dc41952961e5c7b21acac08a8bf1eb0f69e124.1671123115.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> (raw)

Although it's vanishingly unlikely that anyone would integrate an SMMU
within a coherent interconnect without also making the pagetable walk
interface coherent, the same effect happens if a coherent SMMU fails to
advertise CTTW correctly. This turns out to be the case on some popular
NXP SoCs, where VFIO started failing the IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY test,
even though IOMMU_CACHE *was* previously achieving the desired effect
anyway thanks to the underlying integration.

While those SoCs stand to gain some more general benefits from a
firmware update to override CTTW correctly in DT/ACPI, it's also easy
to work around this in Linux as well, to avoid imposing too much on
affected users - since the upstream client devices *are* correctly
marked as coherent, we can trivially infer their coherent paths through
the SMMU as well.

Reported-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Fixes: df198b37e72c ("iommu/arm-smmu: Report IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY better")
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
index 30dab1418e3f..0e679ad3171f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -1319,8 +1319,14 @@ static bool arm_smmu_capable(struct device *dev, enum iommu_cap cap)
 
 	switch (cap) {
 	case IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY:
-		/* Assume that a coherent TCU implies coherent TBUs */
-		return cfg->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK;
+		/*
+		 * It's overwhelmingly the case in practice that when the pagetable
+		 * walk interface is connected to a coherent interconnect, all the
+		 * translation interfaces are too. Furthermore if the device is
+		 * natively coherent, then its translation interface must also be.
+		 */
+		return cfg->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK ||
+			device_get_dma_attr(dev) == DEV_DMA_COHERENT;
 	case IOMMU_CAP_NOEXEC:
 		return true;
 	default:
-- 
2.36.1.dirty


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-15 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-15 16:51 Robin Murphy [this message]
2022-12-19 12:03 ` [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: Report IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY even betterer Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-10 10:56 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-10 11:10   ` Will Deacon
2023-01-10 14:02 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d6dc41952961e5c7b21acac08a8bf1eb0f69e124.1671123115.git.robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox