From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Cc: amitsinght@marvell.com, baisheng.gao@unisoc.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, carl@os.amperecomputing.com,
dave.martin@arm.com, david@kernel.org, dfustini@baylibre.com,
fenghuay@nvidia.com, james.morse@arm.com, jic23@kernel.org,
kobak@nvidia.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peternewman@google.com,
punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com, quic_jiles@quicinc.com,
reinette.chatre@intel.com, rohit.mathew@arm.com,
scott@os.amperecomputing.com, sdonthineni@nvidia.com,
tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, xhao@linux.alibaba.com,
zengheng4@huawei.com, x86@kernel.org, leitao@kernel.org,
kas@kernel.org, puranjay@kernel.org, usama.arif@linux.dev,
kernel-team@meta.com, Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] arm_mpam: resctrl: Pre-allocate assignable monitors
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 20:22:26 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff2b7718-903c-431b-b849-bc4cd0a522dd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707162440.12132-3-ben.horgan@arm.com>
On 7/8/26 2:24 AM, Ben Horgan wrote:
> MPAM is able to emulate ABMC, i.e. mbm_event mode, by making memory
> bandwidth monitors assignable. Rather than supporting the 'default'
> mbm_assign_mode always use 'mbm_event' mode even if there are sufficient
> memory bandwidth monitors. The per monitor event configuration is only
> provided by resctrl when in 'mbm_event' mode and so only allowing
> 'mbm_event' mode will make it easier to support per-monitor event
> configuration for MPAM. For the moment, the only event supported is
> mbm_total_event with no bandwidth type configuration. The 'mbm_assign_mode'
> file will still show 'default' when there is no support for memory
> bandwidth monitoring.
>
> The monitors need to be allocated from the driver, and mapped to whichever
> control/monitor group resctrl wants to use them with.
>
> Add a second array to hold the monitor values indexed by resctrl's cntr_id.
>
> When CDP is in use, two monitors are needed so the available number of
> counters halves. Platforms with one monitor will have zero monitors when
> CDP is in use.
>
> Co-developed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changes since rfc v1:
> abmc enabled even if enough counters
> Helpers from dropped free running commits
> carry on with zero counters if using cdp
> set config bits
> use kmalloc_objs
> drop tags for rework
> Configure mbm_cntr_configurable, mbm_cntr_assign_fixed
>
> Changes since rfc v2:
> Don't set mon->assigned_counters to an error pointer
> Fix mpam_resctrl_teardown_mon()
> Remove free running check
> Separate cleanup allocations, e.g. __free(), from the rest
> Restrict scope on err in mpam_resctrl_monitor_init()
>
> Changes since v3:
> Correct NULL check in mpam_resctrl_teardown_mon() (Shaopeng)
> variable allocation ordering in mpam_resctrl_pick_domain_id() (Shaopeng)
> Move mon.* assignments from mpam_resctrl_monitor_sync_abmc_vals()
> to mpam_resctrl_monitor_init_abmc() counters (Sashiko)
> use kvmalloc_obj() for allocations that may be big on some
> platforms (Sashiko)
>
> Changes since v4:
> Remove l3_num_allocated_mbwu (Koba)
> indexed by idx -> indexed by resctrl's cntr_id (Fenghua)
> ---
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h | 6 +-
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c | 143 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Some nitpicks below, this looks good in either way:
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> index 04d1a59f02af..def0e3a65c23 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> @@ -409,7 +409,11 @@ struct mpam_resctrl_res {
> struct mpam_resctrl_mon {
> struct mpam_class *class;
>
> - /* per-class data that resctrl needs will live here */
> + /* Array of allocated MBWU monitors, indexed by (closid, rmid). */
> + int *mbwu_idx_to_mon;
> +
> + /* Array of assigned MBWU monitors, indexed by resctrl's cntr_id. */
> + int *assigned_counters;
> };
>
> static inline int mpam_alloc_csu_mon(struct mpam_class *class)
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
> index 0fce9703b869..91b589b110a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ int resctrl_arch_cntr_read(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_l3_mon_domain *d,
>
> bool resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_enabled(struct rdt_resource *r)
> {
> - return false;
> + return (r == &mpam_resctrl_controls[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].resctrl_res);
> }
>
> int resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_set(struct rdt_resource *r, bool enable)
> @@ -185,6 +185,26 @@ static void resctrl_reset_task_closids(void)
> read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> }
>
> +static void mpam_resctrl_monitor_sync_abmc_vals(struct rdt_resource *l3)
> +{
> + struct mpam_resctrl_mon *mon = &mpam_resctrl_counters[QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID];
> +
> + if (!mon->class)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!mon->assigned_counters)
> + return;
> +
> + l3->mon.num_mbm_cntrs = mon->class->props.num_mbwu_mon;
> + if (cdp_enabled)
> + l3->mon.num_mbm_cntrs /= 2;
> +
> + /*
> + * Continue as normal even if enabling cdp causes there to be
> + * zero counters. This avoids giving resctrl mixed messages.
> + */
> +}
> +
> int resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled(enum resctrl_res_level rid, bool enable)
> {
> u32 partid_i = RESCTRL_RESERVED_CLOSID, partid_d = RESCTRL_RESERVED_CLOSID;
> @@ -244,6 +264,7 @@ int resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled(enum resctrl_res_level rid, bool enable)
> WRITE_ONCE(arm64_mpam_global_default, mpam_get_regval(current));
>
> resctrl_reset_task_closids();
> + mpam_resctrl_monitor_sync_abmc_vals(l3);
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> mpam_set_cpu_defaults(cpu, partid_d, partid_i, 0, 0);
> @@ -613,6 +634,9 @@ static bool class_has_usable_mbwu(struct mpam_class *class)
> if (!mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu, cprops))
> return false;
>
> + if (!cprops->num_mbwu_mon)
> + return false;
> +
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -935,6 +959,50 @@ static void mpam_resctrl_pick_mba(void)
> }
> }
>
> +static void __free_mbwu_mon(struct mpam_class *class, int *array,
> + u16 num_mbwu_mon)
> +{
> + for (int i = 0; i < num_mbwu_mon; i++) {
> + if (array[i] < 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + mpam_free_mbwu_mon(class, array[i]);
> + array[i] = ~0;
s/~0/-1. In long run, we may need a macro for this:
#define MPAM_MBWU_MON_INVALID_ID (-1)
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int __alloc_mbwu_mon(struct mpam_class *class, int *array,
> + u16 num_mbwu_mon)
> +{
> + for (int i = 0; i < num_mbwu_mon; i++) {
> + int mbwu_mon = mpam_alloc_mbwu_mon(class);
> +
> + if (mbwu_mon < 0) {
> + __free_mbwu_mon(class, array, num_mbwu_mon);
> + return mbwu_mon;
> + }
> + array[i] = mbwu_mon;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int *__alloc_mbwu_array(struct mpam_class *class, u16 num_mbwu_mon)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + int *array __free(kvfree) = kvmalloc_objs(*array, num_mbwu_mon);
> + if (!array)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + memset(array, -1, num_mbwu_mon * sizeof(*array));
This looks a bit subtle. array[i] is split into 4-bytes and each of them
is filled with -1 (0xff), the combined output is correct that array[i] == -1.
> +
> + err = __alloc_mbwu_mon(class, array, num_mbwu_mon);
> + if (err)
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> + return_ptr(array);
> +}
> +
> static void counter_update_class(enum resctrl_event_id evt_id,
> struct mpam_class *class)
> {
> @@ -1091,6 +1159,43 @@ static int mpam_resctrl_pick_domain_id(int cpu, struct mpam_component *comp)
> return comp->comp_id;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * This must run after all event counters have been picked so that any free
> + * running counters have already been allocated.
> + */
> +static int mpam_resctrl_monitor_init_abmc(struct mpam_resctrl_mon *mon)
> +{
> + struct mpam_resctrl_res *res = &mpam_resctrl_controls[RDT_RESOURCE_L3];
> + size_t num_rmid = resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx();
> + struct rdt_resource *l3 = &res->resctrl_res;
> + struct mpam_class *class = mon->class;
> + u16 num_mbwu_mon;
> + int *cntrs;
> +
> + int *rmid_array __free(kvfree) = kvmalloc_objs(*rmid_array, num_rmid);
> + if (!rmid_array) {
> + pr_debug("Failed to allocate RMID array\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + memset(rmid_array, -1, num_rmid * sizeof(*rmid_array));
> +
Same as above.
> + num_mbwu_mon = class->props.num_mbwu_mon;
> + cntrs = __alloc_mbwu_array(mon->class, num_mbwu_mon);
> + if (IS_ERR(cntrs))
> + return PTR_ERR(cntrs);
> + mon->assigned_counters = cntrs;
> + mon->mbwu_idx_to_mon = no_free_ptr(rmid_array);
> +
> + l3->mon.mbm_cntr_assignable = true;
> + l3->mon.mbm_assign_on_mkdir = true;
> + l3->mon.mbm_cntr_configurable = false;
> + l3->mon.mbm_cntr_assign_fixed = true;
> +
> + mpam_resctrl_monitor_sync_abmc_vals(l3);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int mpam_resctrl_monitor_init(struct mpam_resctrl_mon *mon,
> enum resctrl_event_id type)
> {
> @@ -1135,8 +1240,21 @@ static int mpam_resctrl_monitor_init(struct mpam_resctrl_mon *mon,
> */
> l3->mon.num_rmid = resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx();
>
> - if (resctrl_enable_mon_event(type, false, 0, NULL))
> - l3->mon_capable = true;
> + if (type == QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID) {
> + int err;
> +
> + err = mpam_resctrl_monitor_init_abmc(mon);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + static_assert(MAX_EVT_CONFIG_BITS == 0x7f);
> + l3->mon.mbm_cfg_mask = MAX_EVT_CONFIG_BITS;
> + }
> +
> + if (!resctrl_enable_mon_event(type, false, 0, NULL))
> + return -EINVAL;
I don't see wher the memory allocated by mpam_resctrl_monitor_init_abmc() is release
on errors. We may be tolerant to small memory leakage in this case, I guess.
> +
> + l3->mon_capable = true;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1699,6 +1817,23 @@ void mpam_resctrl_exit(void)
> resctrl_exit();
> }
>
> +static void mpam_resctrl_teardown_mon(struct mpam_resctrl_mon *mon, struct mpam_class *class)
> +{
> + u32 num_mbwu_mon = class->props.num_mbwu_mon;
> +
> + if (!mon->mbwu_idx_to_mon)
> + return;
> +
> + if (mon->assigned_counters) {
> + __free_mbwu_mon(class, mon->assigned_counters, num_mbwu_mon);
> + kvfree(mon->assigned_counters);
> + mon->assigned_counters = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + kvfree(mon->mbwu_idx_to_mon);
> + mon->mbwu_idx_to_mon = NULL;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * The driver is detaching an MSC from this class, if resctrl was using it,
> * pull on resctrl_exit().
> @@ -1721,6 +1856,8 @@ void mpam_resctrl_teardown_class(struct mpam_class *class)
> for_each_mpam_resctrl_mon(mon, eventid) {
> if (mon->class == class) {
> mon->class = NULL;
> +
> + mpam_resctrl_teardown_mon(mon, class);
> break;
> }
> }
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-07 16:24 [PATCH v5 0/5] arm_mpam: resctrl: Counter Assignment (ABMC) Ben Horgan
2026-07-07 16:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] arm_mpam: resctrl: Pick classes for use as MBM counters Ben Horgan
2026-07-15 10:12 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-07 16:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] arm_mpam: resctrl: Pre-allocate assignable monitors Ben Horgan
2026-07-15 10:22 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2026-07-07 16:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] arm_mpam: resctrl: Add resctrl_arch_config_cntr() for ABMC use Ben Horgan
2026-07-15 10:22 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-07 16:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] arm_mpam: resctrl: Add resctrl_arch_cntr_read() & resctrl_arch_reset_cntr() Ben Horgan
2026-07-15 10:23 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-07 16:24 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: mpam: Add memory bandwidth usage (MBWU) documentation Ben Horgan
2026-07-09 16:43 ` Fenghua Yu
2026-07-15 10:23 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-15 5:44 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] arm_mpam: resctrl: Counter Assignment (ABMC) Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff2b7718-903c-431b-b849-bc4cd0a522dd@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=amitsinght@marvell.com \
--cc=baisheng.gao@unisoc.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=leitao@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rohit.mathew@arm.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox