Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/25] drm/msm/dpu: pass dpu_format to _dpu_hw_sspp_setup_scaler3()
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 15:30:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fa56e8f-a169-e342-a670-89dc48ac3cdc@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220209172520.3719906-14-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>



On 2/9/2022 9:25 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> There is no need to pass full dpu_hw_pipe_cfg instance to
> _dpu_hw_sspp_setup_scaler3, pass just struct dpu_format pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c | 9 ++++-----
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.h | 7 +++----
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c   | 4 ++--
>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c
> index d8120168f974..7194c14f87bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.c
> @@ -415,19 +415,18 @@ static void dpu_hw_sspp_setup_pe_config(struct dpu_hw_pipe *ctx,
>   }
>   
>   static void _dpu_hw_sspp_setup_scaler3(struct dpu_hw_pipe *ctx,
> -		struct dpu_hw_pipe_cfg *sspp,
> -		void *scaler_cfg)

This change does two things:

1) pass fmt and stop passing dpu_hw_pipe_cfg
2) change the scaler_cfg from void to struct dpu_hw_scaler3_cfg

So it seems like we had this void casting to allow different versions of 
the scaler to be passed and based on catalog bits the appropriate 
structs can be used (scaler2/scaler3)

In the current DPU we have only scaler3. For that reason this is fine.

I do not know what versions of scaler we will support in DPU.

Do you think we can retain the void casting in this change and just 
change passing the format?



> +		struct dpu_hw_scaler3_cfg *scaler3_cfg,
> +		const struct dpu_format *format)
>   {
>   	u32 idx;
> -	struct dpu_hw_scaler3_cfg *scaler3_cfg = scaler_cfg;
>   
> -	if (_sspp_subblk_offset(ctx, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3, &idx) || !sspp
> +	if (_sspp_subblk_offset(ctx, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3, &idx)
>   		|| !scaler3_cfg)
>   		return;
>   
>   	dpu_hw_setup_scaler3(&ctx->hw, scaler3_cfg, idx,
>   			ctx->cap->sblk->scaler_blk.version,
> -			sspp->layout.format);
> +			format);
>   }
>   
>   static u32 _dpu_hw_sspp_get_scaler3_ver(struct dpu_hw_pipe *ctx)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.h
> index 74171fb4e585..eee8501ea80d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_sspp.h
> @@ -334,13 +334,12 @@ struct dpu_hw_sspp_ops {
>   
>   	/**
>   	 * setup_scaler - setup scaler
> -	 * @ctx: Pointer to pipe context
> -	 * @pipe_cfg: Pointer to pipe configuration
>   	 * @scaler_cfg: Pointer to scaler configuration
> +	 * @format: pixel format parameters
>   	 */
>   	void (*setup_scaler)(struct dpu_hw_pipe *ctx,
> -		struct dpu_hw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg,
> -		void *scaler_cfg);
> +		struct dpu_hw_scaler3_cfg *scaler3_cfg,
> +		const struct dpu_format *format);
>   
>   	/**
>   	 * get_scaler_ver - get scaler h/w version
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> index 3ce7dcc285e2..e9421fa2fb2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> @@ -646,8 +646,8 @@ static void _dpu_plane_setup_scaler(struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe,
>   	if (pipe_hw->ops.setup_scaler &&
>   			pipe->multirect_index != DPU_SSPP_RECT_1)
>   		pipe_hw->ops.setup_scaler(pipe_hw,
> -				pipe_cfg,
> -				&scaler3_cfg);
> +				&scaler3_cfg,
> +				fmt);
>   }
>   
>   /**

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-09 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-09 17:24 [PATCH 00/25] drm/msm/dpu: wide planes support Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-09 17:24 ` [PATCH 01/25] drm/msm/dpu: rip out master " Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-27  1:28   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:24 ` [PATCH 02/25] drm/msm/dpu: do not limit the zpos property Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-27  1:32   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:24 ` [PATCH 03/25] drm/msm/dpu: add support for SSPP allocation to RM Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-04-27  2:06   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:24 ` [PATCH 04/25] drm/msm/dpu: move SSPP debugfs creation to dpu_kms.c Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-03 21:34   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-05-03 22:11     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-03 22:34       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 05/25] drm/msm/dpu: move pipe_hw to dpu_plane_state Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-03 22:32   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-05-14  6:37     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-26 20:21       ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 06/25] drm/msm/dpu: inline dpu_plane_get_ctl_flush Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-03 22:55   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 07/25] drm/msm/dpu: drop dpu_plane_pipe function Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-03 23:04   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 08/25] drm/msm/dpu: get rid of cached flush_mask Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-03 23:40   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 09/25] drm/msm/dpu: dpu_crtc_blend_setup: split mixer and ctl logic Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-06 18:56   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-05-06 20:14     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 10/25] drm/msm/dpu: introduce struct dpu_sw_pipe Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-06 21:30   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-05-06 21:39     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-06 21:48       ` [Freedreno] " Abhinav Kumar
2022-05-06 22:29         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-06 22:46           ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 11/25] drm/msm/dpu: use dpu_sw_pipe for dpu_hw_sspp callbacks Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-06 22:24   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 12/25] drm/msm/dpu: inline _dpu_plane_set_scanout Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-06 23:33   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-05-06 23:34     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 13/25] drm/msm/dpu: pass dpu_format to _dpu_hw_sspp_setup_scaler3() Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-09 22:30   ` Abhinav Kumar [this message]
2022-05-14  6:46     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 14/25] drm/msm/dpu: move stride programming to dpu_hw_sspp_setup_sourceaddress Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 18:50   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 15/25] drm/msm/dpu: remove dpu_hw_fmt_layout from struct dpu_hw_pipe_cfg Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 18:58   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-05-14  6:53     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 16/25] drm/msm/dpu: drop EAGAIN check from dpu_format_populate_layout Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-13 19:03   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 17/25] drm/msm/dpu: drop src_split and multirect check from dpu_crtc_atomic_check Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-26 22:59   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 18/25] drm/msm/dpu: move the rest of plane checks to dpu_plane_atomic_check() Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-27  0:14   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 19/25] drm/msm/dpu: don't use unsupported blend stages Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-14  1:57   ` Abhinav Kumar
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 20/25] drm/msm/dpu: add dpu_hw_pipe_cfg to dpu_plane_state Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 21/25] drm/msm/dpu: simplify dpu_plane_validate_src() Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 22/25] drm/msm/dpu: rewrite plane's QoS-related functions to take dpu_sw_pipe and dpu_format Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 23/25] drm/msm/dpu: rework dpu_plane_atomic_check() and dpu_plane_sspp_atomic_update() Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 24/25] drm/msm/dpu: populate SmartDMA features in hw catalog Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-02-09 17:25 ` [PATCH 25/25] drm/msm/dpu: add support for wide planes Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-03-17  1:10 ` [PATCH 00/25] drm/msm/dpu: wide planes support Abhinav Kumar
2022-03-17  7:59   ` Dmitry Baryshkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0fa56e8f-a169-e342-a670-89dc48ac3cdc@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox