Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: display/msm: gpu: Document A612 GPU

[Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 11/22/2025 4:32 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 03:22:16AM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> +
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            const: qcom,adreno-612.0
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        clocks:
>> +          items:
>> +            - description: GPU Core clock
>> +
>> +        clock-names:
>> +          items:
>> +            - const: core
>> +
>> +      required:
>> +        - clocks
>> +        - clock-names
>> +
>>      else:
> 
> I am pretty sure you break not only intention/logic behindi this else,
> but actually cause real warnings to appear.
> 
> The else was intentional, right? So the pattern further will not match
> some of devices defined in if:. Now else is for different part, so only
> 612 out of these devices is excluded.
> 
> There is a reason we do not want ever else:if: in bindings. If it
> appeared, sure, maybe there is some benefit of it, but it means you need
> to be more careful now.

Aah! I missed that this comes under an 'allOf'. Not an expert in this
syntax, does moving this entire block under an 'else' make sense? Or is
there a saner alternative?

Regrettably, I tested dtbs-check only for the talos-ride dtb.

-Akhil.

> 
>>        if:
>>          properties:
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.51.0
>>