Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom,scm: Document SCM on Shikra SoC

[Komal Bajaj <komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 5/4/2026 4:33 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2026 at 11:23:46PM +0530, Komal Bajaj wrote:
>> Document the SCM compatible for the Shikra SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml
>> index 7918d31f58b4..bb1e0a0d1d3c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/qcom,scm.yaml
>> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ properties:
>>             - qcom,scm-sdx55
>>             - qcom,scm-sdx65
>>             - qcom,scm-sdx75
>> +          - qcom,scm-shikra
>>             - qcom,scm-sm6115
>>             - qcom,scm-sm6125
>>             - qcom,scm-sm6350
>> @@ -146,6 +147,7 @@ allOf:
>>                 - qcom,scm-msm8974
>>                 - qcom,scm-msm8976
>>                 - qcom,scm-qcm2290
>> +              - qcom,scm-shikra
>>                 - qcom,scm-sm6375
>>       then:
>>         required:
>> @@ -165,6 +167,7 @@ allOf:
>>                 - qcom,scm-msm8660
>>                 - qcom,scm-msm8960
>>                 - qcom,scm-qcm2290
>> +              - qcom,scm-shikra
>>                 - qcom,scm-sm6375
> This looks wrong or the diff hunks are confusing. Aren't you changing
> one if:then: block for clocks and then second different one which
> disallows clocks?
>
> dtbs_check on your DTS would tell you...

The two hunks touch two separate allOf blocks:

- Block 1 (required: [clocks, clock-names]): SoCs that need clocks at all
- Block 2 (clock-names: [core], clocks maxItems: SoCs using exactly one 
clock named core

Both hunks are intentional.
Verified with dtbs_check — no complaints.

Thanks
Komal

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>