From: Olav Haugan <ohaugan@codeaurora.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Update task->on_rq when tasks are moving between runqueues
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:57:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151029005710.GA11285@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151025100924.GP2508@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 15-10-25 11:09:24, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:01:02AM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote:
> > Task->on_rq has three states:
> > 0 - Task is not on runqueue (rq)
> > 1 (TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED) - Task is on rq
> > 2 (TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING) - Task is on rq but in the process of being
> > migrated to another rq
> >
> > When a task is moving between rqs task->on_rq state should be
> > TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING
>
> Only when not holding both rq locks..
IMHO I think we should keep the state of p->on_rq updated with the correct state
all the time unless I am incorrect in what p->on_rq represent. The task
is moving between rq's and is on the rq so the state should be
TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING right? I do realize that the code is currently not
broken. However, in the future someone might come along and change
set_task_cpu() and the code change might rely on an accurate p->on_rq value. It
would be good design to keep this value correct.
Thanks,
--
.Olav
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-29 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-24 18:01 [PATCH] sched: Update task->on_rq when tasks are moving between runqueues Olav Haugan
2015-10-25 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-29 0:57 ` Olav Haugan [this message]
2015-10-29 1:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02 20:40 ` Paul Turner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151029005710.GA11285@codeaurora.org \
--to=ohaugan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox