Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Olav Haugan <ohaugan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Update task->on_rq when tasks are moving between runqueues
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 02:58:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151029015852.GF11242@worktop.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151029005710.GA11285@codeaurora.org>

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:57:10PM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote:
> On 15-10-25 11:09:24, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:01:02AM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote:
> > > Task->on_rq has three states:
> > > 	0 - Task is not on runqueue (rq)
> > > 	1 (TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED) - Task is on rq
> > > 	2 (TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING) - Task is on rq but in the process of being
> > > 	migrated to another rq
> > > 
> > > When a task is moving between rqs task->on_rq state should be
> > > TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING
> > 
> > Only when not holding both rq locks..
> 
> IMHO I think we should keep the state of p->on_rq updated with the correct state
> all the time unless I am incorrect in what p->on_rq represent. The task
> is moving between rq's and is on the rq so the state should be
> TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING right? I do realize that the code is currently not
> broken. However, in the future someone might come along and change
> set_task_cpu() and the code change might rely on an accurate p->on_rq value. It
> would be good design to keep this value correct.

At the same time; we should also provide lean and fast code. Is it
better to add assertions about required state than to add superfluous
code for just in case scenarios.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-31 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-24 18:01 [PATCH] sched: Update task->on_rq when tasks are moving between runqueues Olav Haugan
2015-10-25 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-29  0:57   ` Olav Haugan
2015-10-29  1:58     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-11-02 20:40       ` Paul Turner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151029015852.GF11242@worktop.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ohaugan@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox