[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.11 03/38] drm/msm: a6xx: Make sure the SQE microcode is safe

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.11 03/38] drm/msm: a6xx: Make sure the SQE microcode is safe

[Sasha Levin]

From: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>

[ Upstream commit 8490f02a3ca45fd1bbcadc243b4db9b69d0e3450 ]

Most a6xx targets have security issues that were fixed with new versions
of the microcode(s). Make sure that we are booting with a safe version of
the microcode for the target and print a message and error if not.

v2: Add more informative error messages and fix typos

Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
index 0366419d8bfe..e7a8442b59af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
@@ -521,28 +521,73 @@ static int a6xx_cp_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 	return a6xx_idle(gpu, ring) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static void a6xx_ucode_check_version(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu,
+/*
+ * Check that the microcode version is new enough to include several key
+ * security fixes. Return true if the ucode is safe.
+ */
+static bool a6xx_ucode_check_version(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu,
 		struct drm_gem_object *obj)
 {
+	struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = &a6xx_gpu->base;
+	struct msm_gpu *gpu = &adreno_gpu->base;
 	u32 *buf = msm_gem_get_vaddr(obj);
+	bool ret = false;
 
 	if (IS_ERR(buf))
-		return;
+		return false;
 
 	/*
-	 * If the lowest nibble is 0xa that is an indication that this microcode
-	 * has been patched. The actual version is in dword [3] but we only care
-	 * about the patchlevel which is the lowest nibble of dword [3]
-	 *
-	 * Otherwise check that the firmware is greater than or equal to 1.90
-	 * which was the first version that had this fix built in
+	 * Targets up to a640 (a618, a630 and a640) need to check for a
+	 * microcode version that is patched to support the whereami opcode or
+	 * one that is new enough to include it by default.
 	 */
-	if (((buf[0] & 0xf) == 0xa) && (buf[2] & 0xf) >= 1)
-		a6xx_gpu->has_whereami = true;
-	else if ((buf[0] & 0xfff) > 0x190)
-		a6xx_gpu->has_whereami = true;
+	if (adreno_is_a618(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a630(adreno_gpu) ||
+		adreno_is_a640(adreno_gpu)) {
+		/*
+		 * If the lowest nibble is 0xa that is an indication that this
+		 * microcode has been patched. The actual version is in dword
+		 * [3] but we only care about the patchlevel which is the lowest
+		 * nibble of dword [3]
+		 *
+		 * Otherwise check that the firmware is greater than or equal
+		 * to 1.90 which was the first version that had this fix built
+		 * in
+		 */
+		if ((((buf[0] & 0xf) == 0xa) && (buf[2] & 0xf) >= 1) ||
+			(buf[0] & 0xfff) >= 0x190) {
+			a6xx_gpu->has_whereami = true;
+			ret = true;
+			goto out;
+		}
 
+		DRM_DEV_ERROR(&gpu->pdev->dev,
+			"a630 SQE ucode is too old. Have version %x need at least %x\n",
+			buf[0] & 0xfff, 0x190);
+	}  else {
+		/*
+		 * a650 tier targets don't need whereami but still need to be
+		 * equal to or newer than 1.95 for other security fixes
+		 */
+		if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu)) {
+			if ((buf[0] & 0xfff) >= 0x195) {
+				ret = true;
+				goto out;
+			}
+
+			DRM_DEV_ERROR(&gpu->pdev->dev,
+				"a650 SQE ucode is too old. Have version %x need at least %x\n",
+				buf[0] & 0xfff, 0x195);
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * When a660 is added those targets should return true here
+		 * since those have all the critical security fixes built in
+		 * from the start
+		 */
+	}
+out:
 	msm_gem_put_vaddr(obj);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int a6xx_ucode_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
@@ -565,7 +610,13 @@ static int a6xx_ucode_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 		}
 
 		msm_gem_object_set_name(a6xx_gpu->sqe_bo, "sqefw");
-		a6xx_ucode_check_version(a6xx_gpu, a6xx_gpu->sqe_bo);
+		if (!a6xx_ucode_check_version(a6xx_gpu, a6xx_gpu->sqe_bo)) {
+			msm_gem_unpin_iova(a6xx_gpu->sqe_bo, gpu->aspace);
+			drm_gem_object_put(a6xx_gpu->sqe_bo);
+
+			a6xx_gpu->sqe_bo = NULL;
+			return -EPERM;
+		}
 	}
 
 	gpu_write64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_SQE_INSTR_BASE_LO,
-- 
2.30.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.11 16/38] drm/msm/dsi_pll_7nm: Fix variable usage for pll_lockdet_rate

[Sasha Levin]

From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

[ Upstream commit 9daaf31307856defb1070685418ce5a484ecda3a ]

The PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1 was being programmed with a hardcoded value
directly, but the same value was also being specified in the
dsi_pll_regs struct pll_lockdet_rate variable: let's use it!

Based on 362cadf34b9f ("drm/msm/dsi_pll_10nm: Fix variable usage for
pll_lockdet_rate")

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_7nm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_7nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_7nm.c
index 93bf142e4a4e..901e8b8819d3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_7nm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_7nm.c
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ static void dsi_pll_commit(struct dsi_pll_7nm *pll)
 	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_FRAC_DIV_START_LOW_1, reg->frac_div_start_low);
 	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_FRAC_DIV_START_MID_1, reg->frac_div_start_mid);
 	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_FRAC_DIV_START_HIGH_1, reg->frac_div_start_high);
-	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1, 0x40);
+	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1, reg->pll_lockdet_rate);
 	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCK_DELAY, 0x06);
 	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_CMODE_1, 0x10); /* TODO: 0x00 for CPHY */
 	pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_CLOCK_INVERTERS, reg->pll_clock_inverters);
-- 
2.30.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.11 17/38] drm/msm/adreno: a5xx_power: Don't apply A540 lm_setup to other GPUs

[Sasha Levin]

From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>

[ Upstream commit 4a9d36b0610aa7034340e976652e5b43320dd7c5 ]

While passing the A530-specific lm_setup func to A530 and A540
to !A530 was fine back when only these two were supported, it
certainly is not a good idea to send A540 specifics to smaller
GPUs like A508 and friends.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c
index f176a6f3eff6..e58670a61df4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ int a5xx_power_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 	/* Set up the limits management */
 	if (adreno_is_a530(adreno_gpu))
 		a530_lm_setup(gpu);
-	else
+	else if (adreno_is_a540(adreno_gpu))
 		a540_lm_setup(gpu);
 
 	/* Set up SP/TP power collpase */
-- 
2.30.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.11 18/38] drm/msm: Ratelimit invalid-fence message

[Sasha Levin]

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

[ Upstream commit 7ad48d27a2846bfda29214fb454d001c3e02b9e7 ]

We have seen a couple cases where low memory situations cause something
bad to happen, followed by a flood of these messages obscuring the root
cause.  Lets ratelimit the dmesg spam so that next time it happens we
don't lose the kernel traces leading up to this.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c
index ad2703698b05..cd59a5918038 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ int msm_wait_fence(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fence,
 	int ret;
 
 	if (fence > fctx->last_fence) {
-		DRM_ERROR("%s: waiting on invalid fence: %u (of %u)\n",
+		DRM_ERROR_RATELIMITED("%s: waiting on invalid fence: %u (of %u)\n",
 				fctx->name, fence, fctx->last_fence);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-- 
2.30.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.11 24/38] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: icc path needs to be set before dpu runtime resume

[Sasha Levin]

From: Kalyan Thota <kalyant@codeaurora.org>

[ Upstream commit 627dc55c273dab308303a5217bd3e767d7083ddb ]

DPU runtime resume will request for a min vote on the AXI bus as
it is a necessary step before turning ON the AXI clock.

The change does below
1) Move the icc path set before requesting runtime get_sync.
2) remove the dependency of hw catalog for min ib vote
as it is initialized at a later point.

Signed-off-by: Kalyan Thota <kalyan_t@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
index 374b0e8471e6..0f1b04ef61f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
 #define DPU_DEBUGFS_DIR "msm_dpu"
 #define DPU_DEBUGFS_HWMASKNAME "hw_log_mask"
 
+#define MIN_IB_BW	400000000ULL /* Min ib vote 400MB */
+
 static int dpu_kms_hw_init(struct msm_kms *kms);
 static void _dpu_kms_mmu_destroy(struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms);
 
@@ -931,6 +933,9 @@ static int dpu_kms_hw_init(struct msm_kms *kms)
 		DPU_DEBUG("REG_DMA is not defined");
 	}
 
+	if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->dev->of_node, "qcom,sc7180-mdss"))
+		dpu_kms_parse_data_bus_icc_path(dpu_kms);
+
 	pm_runtime_get_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
 
 	dpu_kms->core_rev = readl_relaxed(dpu_kms->mmio + 0x0);
@@ -1032,9 +1037,6 @@ static int dpu_kms_hw_init(struct msm_kms *kms)
 
 	dpu_vbif_init_memtypes(dpu_kms);
 
-	if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->dev->of_node, "qcom,sc7180-mdss"))
-		dpu_kms_parse_data_bus_icc_path(dpu_kms);
-
 	pm_runtime_put_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1191,10 +1193,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused dpu_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 
 	ddev = dpu_kms->dev;
 
+	WARN_ON(!(dpu_kms->num_paths));
 	/* Min vote of BW is required before turning on AXI clk */
 	for (i = 0; i < dpu_kms->num_paths; i++)
-		icc_set_bw(dpu_kms->path[i], 0,
-			dpu_kms->catalog->perf.min_dram_ib);
+		icc_set_bw(dpu_kms->path[i], 0, Bps_to_icc(MIN_IB_BW));
 
 	rc = msm_dss_enable_clk(mp->clk_config, mp->num_clk, true);
 	if (rc) {
-- 
2.30.1