From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] clk: qcom: rpm/rpmh: drop platform names
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:10:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221129101025.960110-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> (raw)
Both RPM and RPMH clocks use platform (SoC) as a part of the clock
definition. However there is nothing really SoC-specific in this
part. Using it just leads to confusion and sometimes to duplication of
definitions. Drop the SoC name where it is logical.
Note: the smd-rpm clocks also suffer from the same issue a bit, there
are platform-specific and platform-independent clocks. Corresponding
patches will be sent later if this approach is accepted.
Dmitry Baryshkov (4):
clk: qcom: rpmh: group clock definitions together
clk: qcom: rpmh: reuse common duplicate clocks
clk: qcom: rpmh: drop the platform from clock definitions
clk: qcom: rpm: drop the platform from clock definitions
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c | 194 ++++++++---------
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 419 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 294 insertions(+), 319 deletions(-)
--
2.35.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-29 10:10 Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2022-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] clk: qcom: rpmh: group clock definitions together Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 13:23 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-11-29 22:07 ` Alex Elder
2022-11-30 10:51 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] clk: qcom: rpmh: reuse common duplicate clocks Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 13:24 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-11-29 22:07 ` Alex Elder
2022-11-30 10:54 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] clk: qcom: rpmh: drop the platform from clock definitions Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 13:27 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-11-29 14:48 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 22:07 ` Alex Elder
2022-11-30 10:19 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] clk: qcom: rpm: " Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 22:07 ` Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221129101025.960110-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=elder@linaro.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=quic_tdas@quicinc.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox