Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: qcom: rpmh: reuse common duplicate clocks
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:07:26 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <25a47edc-de8b-e217-6470-682603ee31d6@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221129101025.960110-3-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

On 11/29/22 4:10 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> After the grouping it is obvious that some of the clock definitions are
> pure duplicates. Rename them to use a single common name for the clock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

This looks good.  One observation below.

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>

> ---
>   drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> index f13c9bd610d0..c4852bbd00bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> @@ -350,9 +350,7 @@ DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_ARC(sm6350, qlink, qlink_ao, "qphy.lvl", 0x1, 4);
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8250, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_ao, "lnbclka1", 2);
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdm845, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_ao, "lnbclka2", 2);
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdm845, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_ao, "lnbclka3", 2);
> -DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sc8280xp, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_ao, "lnbclka3", 2);
>   
> -DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdx65, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_ao, "lnbclka1", 4);
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8450, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_ao, "lnbclka1", 4);
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8450, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_ao, "lnbclka2", 4);
>   
> @@ -362,7 +360,6 @@ DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm6350, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_ao, "lnbclkg3", 4);
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdm845, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_ao, "rfclka1", 1);
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdm845, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_ao, "rfclka2", 1);
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdm845, rf_clk3, rf_clk3_ao, "rfclka3", 1);
> -DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8150, rf_clk3, rf_clk3_ao, "rfclka3", 1);

So the above one was never used?  (The sdm845 one was already
used instead.)

>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8350, rf_clk4, rf_clk4_ao, "rfclka4", 1);
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8350, rf_clk5, rf_clk5_ao, "rfclka5", 1);
>   
> @@ -370,14 +367,11 @@ DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sc8180x, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_ao, "rfclkd1", 1);
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sc8180x, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_ao, "rfclkd2", 1);
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sc8180x, rf_clk3, rf_clk3_ao, "rfclkd3", 1);
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sc8180x, rf_clk4, rf_clk4_ao, "rfclkd4", 1);
> -DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdx55, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_ao, "rfclkd1", 1);
> -DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sdx55, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_ao, "rfclkd2", 1);
>   
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(sm8350, div_clk1, div_clk1_ao, "divclka1", 2);
>   
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(sdm845, ipa, "IP0");
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(sdm845, ce, "CE0");
> -DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(sdx55, ipa, "IP0");
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(sdx55, qpic_clk, "QP0");
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(sm8350, pka, "PKA0");
>   DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(sm8350, hwkm, "HK0");
> @@ -427,12 +421,12 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sdm670 = {
>   static struct clk_hw *sdx55_rpmh_clocks[] = {
>   	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]		= &sdm845_bi_tcxo.hw,
>   	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]	= &sdm845_bi_tcxo_ao.hw,
> -	[RPMH_RF_CLK1]		= &sdx55_rf_clk1.hw,
> -	[RPMH_RF_CLK1_A]	= &sdx55_rf_clk1_ao.hw,
> -	[RPMH_RF_CLK2]		= &sdx55_rf_clk2.hw,
> -	[RPMH_RF_CLK2_A]	= &sdx55_rf_clk2_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK1]		= &sc8180x_rf_clk1.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK1_A]	= &sc8180x_rf_clk1_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK2]		= &sc8180x_rf_clk2.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK2_A]	= &sc8180x_rf_clk2_ao.hw,
>   	[RPMH_QPIC_CLK]		= &sdx55_qpic_clk.hw,
> -	[RPMH_IPA_CLK]		= &sdx55_ipa.hw,
> +	[RPMH_IPA_CLK]		= &sdm845_ipa.hw,
>   };
>   
>   static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sdx55 = {
> @@ -549,8 +543,8 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sm8350 = {
>   static struct clk_hw *sc8280xp_rpmh_clocks[] = {
>   	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]		= &sdm845_bi_tcxo.hw,
>   	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]	= &sdm845_bi_tcxo_ao.hw,
> -	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3]       = &sc8280xp_ln_bb_clk3.hw,
> -	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3_A]     = &sc8280xp_ln_bb_clk3_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3]       = &sdm845_ln_bb_clk3.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3_A]     = &sdm845_ln_bb_clk3_ao.hw,
>   	[RPMH_IPA_CLK]          = &sdm845_ipa.hw,
>   	[RPMH_PKA_CLK]          = &sm8350_pka.hw,
>   	[RPMH_HWKM_CLK]         = &sm8350_hwkm.hw,
> @@ -624,8 +618,8 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sm6350 = {
>   static struct clk_hw *sdx65_rpmh_clocks[] = {
>   	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]          = &sc7280_bi_tcxo.hw,
>   	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]        = &sc7280_bi_tcxo_ao.hw,
> -	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK1]       = &sdx65_ln_bb_clk1.hw,
> -	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK1_A]     = &sdx65_ln_bb_clk1_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK1]       = &sm8450_ln_bb_clk1.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK1_A]     = &sm8450_ln_bb_clk1_ao.hw,
>   	[RPMH_RF_CLK1]          = &sdm845_rf_clk1.hw,
>   	[RPMH_RF_CLK1_A]        = &sdm845_rf_clk1_ao.hw,
>   	[RPMH_RF_CLK2]          = &sdm845_rf_clk2.hw,


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-29 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-29 10:10 [PATCH 0/4] clk: qcom: rpm/rpmh: drop platform names Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] clk: qcom: rpmh: group clock definitions together Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 13:23   ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-11-29 22:07   ` Alex Elder
2022-11-30 10:51     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] clk: qcom: rpmh: reuse common duplicate clocks Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 13:24   ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-11-29 22:07   ` Alex Elder [this message]
2022-11-30 10:54     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] clk: qcom: rpmh: drop the platform from clock definitions Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 13:27   ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-11-29 14:48     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 22:07   ` Alex Elder
2022-11-30 10:19     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] clk: qcom: rpm: " Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-11-29 22:07   ` Alex Elder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=25a47edc-de8b-e217-6470-682603ee31d6@linaro.org \
    --to=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=quic_tdas@quicinc.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox