* [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries
@ 2013-02-27 23:28 Stephen Boyd
2013-02-27 23:43 ` Stephen Warren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2013-02-27 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm, Barry Song, Kukjin Kim,
Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Russell King, Sascha Hauer,
Shiraz Hashim, Srinidhi Kasagar, Stephen Warren, Tony Lindgren
The TWD and SCU configs are selected by default as long as
MSM_SCORPIONMP is false and/or MCT is false. Implementing the
logic this way certainly saves lines in the Kconfig but it
precludes those machines which select MSM_SCORPIONMP or MCT from
participating in the single zImage effort because when those
machines are combined with other SMP capable machines the TWD and
SCU are no longer selected by default.
Push the select out to the machine entries so that we can compile
these machines together and still select the appropriate configs.
Cc: Barry Song <baohua.song@csr.com>
Acked-by: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
Resending to collect some more acks.
arch/arm/Kconfig | 8 ++++++--
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 2 ++
arch/arm/mach-highbank/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 3 ++-
arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig | 7 ++-----
arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig | 2 ++
arch/arm/mach-prima2/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Kconfig | 2 ++
arch/arm/plat-spear/Kconfig | 2 ++
10 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index dedf02b..8f5707b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -672,6 +672,8 @@ config ARCH_TEGRA
select CLKSRC_OF
select COMMON_CLK
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
+ select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
select HAVE_CLK
select HAVE_SMP
select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
@@ -718,6 +720,8 @@ config ARCH_SHMOBILE
bool "Renesas SH-Mobile / R-Mobile"
select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
+ select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
select HAVE_CLK
select HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV
select HAVE_SMP
@@ -910,6 +914,8 @@ config ARCH_U8500
select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
select CPU_V7
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
+ select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
select HAVE_SMP
select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
select SPARSE_IRQ
@@ -1526,7 +1532,6 @@ config SMP
depends on GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
depends on HAVE_SMP
depends on MMU
- select HAVE_ARM_SCU if !ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP
select USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
help
This enables support for systems with more than one CPU. If you have
@@ -1650,7 +1655,6 @@ config LOCAL_TIMERS
bool "Use local timer interrupts"
depends on SMP
default y
- select HAVE_ARM_TWD if (!ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP && !EXYNOS4_MCT)
help
Enable support for local timers on SMP platforms, rather then the
legacy IPI broadcast method. Local timers allows the system
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
index 70f94c8..54cf73e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ menu "SAMSUNG EXYNOS SoCs Support"
config ARCH_EXYNOS4
bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS4"
default y
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
select HAVE_SMP
select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
help
@@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ config ARCH_EXYNOS4
config ARCH_EXYNOS5
bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5"
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
select HAVE_SMP
help
Samsung EXYNOS5 (Cortex-A15) SoC based systems
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-highbank/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-highbank/Kconfig
index 44b12f9..cd9fcb1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-highbank/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-highbank/Kconfig
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config ARCH_HIGHBANK
select CPU_V7
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
select HAVE_ARM_SCU
+ select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
select HAVE_SMP
select MAILBOX
select PL320_MBOX
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
index 4c9c6f9..2cc0dbd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
@@ -811,7 +811,8 @@ config SOC_IMX6Q
select ARM_GIC
select COMMON_CLK
select CPU_V7
- select HAVE_ARM_SCU
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
+ select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
select HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN if CAN
select HAVE_IMX_GPC
select HAVE_IMX_MMDC
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
index b619085..fceb093 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/Kconfig
@@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ endchoice
config ARCH_MSM8X60
bool "MSM8X60"
- select ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP
select ARM_GIC
select CPU_V7
select GPIO_MSM_V2
+ select HAVE_SMP
select MSM_GPIOMUX
select MSM_SCM if SMP
select MSM_V2_TLMM
@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ config ARCH_MSM8X60
config ARCH_MSM8960
bool "MSM8960"
- select ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP
select ARM_GIC
select CPU_V7
+ select HAVE_SMP
select MSM_GPIOMUX
select MSM_SCM if SMP
select MSM_V2_TLMM
@@ -68,9 +68,6 @@ config MSM_HAS_DEBUG_UART_HS
config MSM_SOC_REV_A
bool
-config ARCH_MSM_SCORPIONMP
- bool
- select HAVE_SMP
config ARCH_MSM_ARM11
bool
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
index 49ac3df..a003110 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ config ARCH_OMAP4
select ARM_GIC
select CACHE_L2X0
select CPU_V7
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
+ select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
select HAVE_SMP
select LOCAL_TIMERS if SMP
select OMAP_INTERCONNECT
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/Kconfig
index 4f7379f..48dfd89 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/Kconfig
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ config ARCH_MARCO
default y
select ARM_GIC
select CPU_V7
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
select HAVE_SMP
select SMP_ON_UP
help
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig
index 14c1d47..d210c0f9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-realview/Kconfig
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ config REALVIEW_EB_A9MP
bool "Support Multicore Cortex-A9 Tile"
depends on MACH_REALVIEW_EB
select CPU_V7
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
+ select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
select HAVE_SMP
select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
help
@@ -23,6 +25,8 @@ config REALVIEW_EB_ARM11MP
depends on MACH_REALVIEW_EB
select ARCH_HAS_BARRIERS if SMP
select CPU_V6K
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
+ select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
select HAVE_SMP
select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
help
@@ -43,6 +47,8 @@ config MACH_REALVIEW_PB11MP
select ARCH_HAS_BARRIERS if SMP
select ARM_GIC
select CPU_V6K
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
+ select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
select HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM
select HAVE_SMP
select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
@@ -85,6 +91,8 @@ config MACH_REALVIEW_PBX
bool "Support RealView(R) Platform Baseboard Explore"
select ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE if CPU_V7 && !REALVIEW_HIGH_PHYS_OFFSET
select ARM_GIC
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
+ select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
select HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM
select HAVE_SMP
select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Kconfig
index 52d315b..5e3a2d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Kconfig
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ config ARCH_VEXPRESS
select COMMON_CLK_VERSATILE
select CPU_V7
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
+ select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
select HAVE_CLK
select HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM
select HAVE_SMP
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-spear/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-spear/Kconfig
index 739d016..439eead 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-spear/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-spear/Kconfig
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ config ARCH_SPEAR13XX
select ARM_GIC
select CPU_V7
select GPIO_SPEAR_SPICS
+ select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
+ select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
select HAVE_SMP
select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
select PINCTRL
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries
2013-02-27 23:28 [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries Stephen Boyd
@ 2013-02-27 23:43 ` Stephen Warren
2013-03-05 1:45 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2013-02-27 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm, Barry Song,
Kukjin Kim, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Russell King,
Sascha Hauer, Shiraz Hashim, Srinidhi Kasagar, Tony Lindgren
On 02/27/2013 04:28 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The TWD and SCU configs are selected by default as long as
> MSM_SCORPIONMP is false and/or MCT is false. Implementing the
> logic this way certainly saves lines in the Kconfig but it
> precludes those machines which select MSM_SCORPIONMP or MCT from
> participating in the single zImage effort because when those
> machines are combined with other SMP capable machines the TWD and
> SCU are no longer selected by default.
>
> Push the select out to the machine entries so that we can compile
> these machines together and still select the appropriate configs.
> Resending to collect some more acks.
Seems simple enough it doesn't really need many, but for Tegra,
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Which kernel is this going into? It's possible Tegra will get converted
to multi-platform in 3.10, which might move that main ARCH_TEGRA block
from arch/arm/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig, although I
suppose it doesn't /have/ to move it. I think some/all(?) other
multi-platform conversions have moved their main Kconfig option like
that though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries
2013-02-27 23:43 ` Stephen Warren
@ 2013-03-05 1:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-05 22:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2013-03-05 1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Warren
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm, Barry Song,
Kukjin Kim, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Russell King,
Sascha Hauer, Shiraz Hashim, Srinidhi Kasagar, Tony Lindgren,
Arnd Bergmann, Olof Johansson
On 02/27/13 15:43, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
> Seems simple enough it doesn't really need many, but for Tegra,
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>
> Which kernel is this going into? It's possible Tegra will get converted
> to multi-platform in 3.10, which might move that main ARCH_TEGRA block
> from arch/arm/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig, although I
> suppose it doesn't /have/ to move it. I think some/all(?) other
> multi-platform conversions have moved their main Kconfig option like
> that though.
Thanks. I'm hoping that Arnd/Olof can pick this up. I'm not sure which
version it will go into.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries
2013-03-05 1:45 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2013-03-05 22:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-16 19:32 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2013-03-05 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Stephen Boyd, Stephen Warren, Kukjin Kim, Russell King,
Srinidhi Kasagar, Tony Lindgren, linux-arm-msm, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Sascha Hauer, Barry Song,
Olof Johansson
On Tuesday 05 March 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 02/27/13 15:43, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >
> > Seems simple enough it doesn't really need many, but for Tegra,
> > Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Which kernel is this going into? It's possible Tegra will get converted
> > to multi-platform in 3.10, which might move that main ARCH_TEGRA block
> > from arch/arm/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig, although I
> > suppose it doesn't have to move it. I think some/all(?) other
> > multi-platform conversions have moved their main Kconfig option like
> > that though.
>
> Thanks. I'm hoping that Arnd/Olof can pick this up. I'm not sure which
> version it will go into.
>
Hmm, it certainly looks useful to me. I think it should go into the next
cleanup branch as a base, so others can build on top of it. We will
also need it for the Exynos multiplatform patches that I hope can land
in 3.10 as well.
Sneaking it in through the fixes branch would make life easier for us,
but it doesn't feel right.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries
2013-03-05 22:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2013-03-16 19:32 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-26 17:34 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2013-03-16 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Stephen Warren, Kukjin Kim, Russell King,
Srinidhi Kasagar, Tony Lindgren, linux-arm-msm, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Sascha Hauer, Barry Song,
Olof Johansson
On 3/5/2013 2:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 March 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 02/27/13 15:43, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> Seems simple enough it doesn't really need many, but for Tegra,
>>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>>
>>> Which kernel is this going into? It's possible Tegra will get converted
>>> to multi-platform in 3.10, which might move that main ARCH_TEGRA block
>>> from arch/arm/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig, although I
>>> suppose it doesn't have to move it. I think some/all(?) other
>>> multi-platform conversions have moved their main Kconfig option like
>>> that though.
>> Thanks. I'm hoping that Arnd/Olof can pick this up. I'm not sure which
>> version it will go into.
>>
> Hmm, it certainly looks useful to me. I think it should go into the next
> cleanup branch as a base, so others can build on top of it. We will
> also need it for the Exynos multiplatform patches that I hope can land
> in 3.10 as well.
>
> Sneaking it in through the fixes branch would make life easier for us,
> but it doesn't feel right.
Arnd, can you pick this up into the arm-soc tree now? It would be good
to get this into next so that conflicts are avoided later on.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries
2013-03-16 19:32 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2013-03-26 17:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-09 16:47 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2013-03-26 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Stephen Warren, Kukjin Kim, Russell King,
Srinidhi Kasagar, Tony Lindgren, linux-arm-msm, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Sascha Hauer, Barry Song,
Olof Johansson
On 03/16/13 12:32, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 3/5/2013 2:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 05 March 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 02/27/13 15:43, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> Seems simple enough it doesn't really need many, but for Tegra,
>>>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>>>
>>>> Which kernel is this going into? It's possible Tegra will get converted
>>>> to multi-platform in 3.10, which might move that main ARCH_TEGRA block
>>>> from arch/arm/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig, although I
>>>> suppose it doesn't have to move it. I think some/all(?) other
>>>> multi-platform conversions have moved their main Kconfig option like
>>>> that though.
>>> Thanks. I'm hoping that Arnd/Olof can pick this up. I'm not sure which
>>> version it will go into.
>>>
>> Hmm, it certainly looks useful to me. I think it should go into the next
>> cleanup branch as a base, so others can build on top of it. We will
>> also need it for the Exynos multiplatform patches that I hope can land
>> in 3.10 as well.
>>
>> Sneaking it in through the fixes branch would make life easier for us,
>> but it doesn't feel right.
> Arnd, can you pick this up into the arm-soc tree now? It would be good
> to get this into next so that conflicts are avoided later on.
>
Arnd?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries
2013-03-26 17:34 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2013-04-09 16:47 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-09 18:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2013-04-09 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Stephen Warren, Kukjin Kim, Russell King,
Srinidhi Kasagar, Tony Lindgren, linux-arm-msm, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Sascha Hauer, Barry Song,
Olof Johansson
On 03/26/13 10:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/16/13 12:32, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 3/5/2013 2:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 05 March 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> On 02/27/13 15:43, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>>> Seems simple enough it doesn't really need many, but for Tegra,
>>>>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Which kernel is this going into? It's possible Tegra will get converted
>>>>> to multi-platform in 3.10, which might move that main ARCH_TEGRA block
>>>>> from arch/arm/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig, although I
>>>>> suppose it doesn't have to move it. I think some/all(?) other
>>>>> multi-platform conversions have moved their main Kconfig option like
>>>>> that though.
>>>> Thanks. I'm hoping that Arnd/Olof can pick this up. I'm not sure which
>>>> version it will go into.
>>>>
>>> Hmm, it certainly looks useful to me. I think it should go into the next
>>> cleanup branch as a base, so others can build on top of it. We will
>>> also need it for the Exynos multiplatform patches that I hope can land
>>> in 3.10 as well.
>>>
>>> Sneaking it in through the fixes branch would make life easier for us,
>>> but it doesn't feel right.
>> Arnd, can you pick this up into the arm-soc tree now? It would be good
>> to get this into next so that conflicts are avoided later on.
>>
> Arnd?
>
Ping?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries
2013-04-09 16:47 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2013-04-09 18:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-09 19:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2013-04-09 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Stephen Warren, Kukjin Kim, Russell King,
Srinidhi Kasagar, Tony Lindgren, linux-arm-msm, Linus Walleij,
linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Sascha Hauer, Barry Song,
Olof Johansson
On Tuesday 09 April 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Sneaking it in through the fixes branch would make life easier for us,
> >>> but it doesn't feel right.
> >> Arnd, can you pick this up into the arm-soc tree now? It would be good
> >> to get this into next so that conflicts are avoided later on.
> >>
> > Arnd?
> >
>
> Ping?
Sorry for the long delay, you scrolled down from my unread emails twice.
Three tips for you to make it more likely to get a fast reaction time:
* Send the original patch to Olof and me, not just the reply to the
on-list patch.
* Use the arm@kernel.org alias to reach us, since that will make the
email go into the right folder
* Use the [GIT PULL] keyword in the subject line, ideally sending a
pull request as well, instead of a separate email. While we do apply
emails, It's often batch processing to apply everything and then
we scan for emails that have PULL in the subject, while others
can get lost.
I've applied it to the next/soc branch now.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries
2013-04-09 18:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2013-04-09 19:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2013-04-09 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd
Cc: Kukjin Kim, Russell King, Srinidhi Kasagar, Tony Lindgren,
linux-arm-msm, Linus Walleij, Stephen Warren, linux-kernel,
Rob Herring, Sascha Hauer, Barry Song, Olof Johansson,
linux-arm-kernel
On Tuesday 09 April 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I've applied it to the next/soc branch now.
>
I just made up my mind again after I got a few merge conflicts. I have
added it to the next/multiplatform branch now instead of next/soc, since
a few of the Kconfig entries changed in this patch are moved to other
files in that branch.
I've also added an entry for mach-zynq, which has gained SMP support
in the meantime. I assume it uses TWD/SCU as it is otherwise rather close
to the ARM reference platforms.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-09 19:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-27 23:28 [PATCHv2] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries Stephen Boyd
2013-02-27 23:43 ` Stephen Warren
2013-03-05 1:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-05 22:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-16 19:32 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-03-26 17:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-09 16:47 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-09 18:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-09 19:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox