Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] mailbox: tmelite-qmp: Introduce TMEL QMP mailbox driver

[Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>]

On 3/4/2025 10:16 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 4.03.2025 10:46 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 10:33, Sricharan Ramabadhran
>> <quic_srichara@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/3/2025 6:34 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:58:42PM +0530, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/28/2025 12:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:23:56AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> +          dev_err(dev, "Failed with status: %d\n", msg.resp.status);
>>>>>>> +          ret = msg.resp.status;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> return msg.resp.status (is it really errno?)
>>>>>>
>>>>> ok, yes error.
>>>>
>>>> The question was if it is an errno, not if it is an error.
>>> status != 0 is an error always.
>>
>> Is it an _errno_ ?
> 
> Dmitry's asking whether the status conforms to the Linux's errno.h
> ABI. If not, add something like:
> 
> ret = msg.resp.status ? -EINVAL : 0
Yeah, responded on other thread. It does not, so will add the mapping.

Regards,
Sricharan