Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] drm/msm/dpu: split dpu_plane_atomic_check()
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 16:19:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <627dd526-2b56-2ecb-9011-4ec08bab454f@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240314000216.392549-7-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>



On 3/13/2024 5:02 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Split dpu_plane_atomic_check() function into two pieces:
> 
> dpu_plane_atomic_check_nopipe() performing generic checks on the pstate,
> without touching the associated pipe,
> 
> and
> 
> dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipes(), which takes into account used pipes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 184 ++++++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 117 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> 

One thing which seemed odd to me is even dpu_plane_atomic_check_nopipe() 
does use pipe_cfg even though its named "nopipe".

Perhaps were you targetting a split of SW planes vs SSPP atomic_check?

I tried applying this patch on top of msm-next to more closely review 
the split up but it does not apply. So, I will review this patch a 
little better after it is re-spun. But will proceed with remaining patches.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> index 6360052523b5..187ac2767a2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> @@ -788,50 +788,22 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(struct dpu_plane *pdpu,
>   #define MAX_UPSCALE_RATIO	20
>   #define MAX_DOWNSCALE_RATIO	4
>   
> -static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> -				  struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> +static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_nopipe(struct drm_plane *plane,
> +					 struct drm_plane_state *new_plane_state,
> +					 const struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>   {
> -	struct drm_plane_state *new_plane_state = drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state(state,
> -										 plane);
>   	int ret = 0, min_scale, max_scale;
>   	struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
>   	struct dpu_kms *kms = _dpu_plane_get_kms(&pdpu->base);
>   	u64 max_mdp_clk_rate = kms->perf.max_core_clk_rate;
>   	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(new_plane_state);
> -	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms = _dpu_plane_get_kms(plane);
> -	struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe = &pstate->pipe;
> -	struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
> -	const struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = NULL;
> -	const struct dpu_format *fmt;
>   	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg;
>   	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->r_pipe_cfg;
>   	struct drm_rect fb_rect = { 0 };
>   	uint32_t max_linewidth;
> -	unsigned int rotation;
> -	uint32_t supported_rotations;
> -	const struct dpu_sspp_cfg *pipe_hw_caps;
> -	const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks *sblk;
>   
> -	if (new_plane_state->crtc)
> -		crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state,
> -							   new_plane_state->crtc);
> -
> -	pipe->sspp = dpu_rm_get_sspp(&dpu_kms->rm, pdpu->pipe);
> -	r_pipe->sspp = NULL;
> -
> -	if (!pipe->sspp)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	pipe_hw_caps = pipe->sspp->cap;
> -	sblk = pipe->sspp->cap->sblk;
> -
> -	if (sblk->scaler_blk.len) {
> -		min_scale = FRAC_16_16(1, MAX_UPSCALE_RATIO);
> -		max_scale = MAX_DOWNSCALE_RATIO << 16;
> -	} else {
> -		min_scale = 1 << 16;
> -		max_scale = 1 << 16;
> -	}
> +	min_scale = FRAC_16_16(1, MAX_UPSCALE_RATIO);
> +	max_scale = MAX_DOWNSCALE_RATIO << 16;
>   
>   	ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(new_plane_state, crtc_state,
>   						  min_scale,
> @@ -844,11 +816,6 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
>   	if (!new_plane_state->visible)
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> -	pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> -	r_pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> -	r_pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> -
>   	pstate->stage = DPU_STAGE_0 + pstate->base.normalized_zpos;
>   	if (pstate->stage >= pdpu->catalog->caps->max_mixer_blendstages) {
>   		DPU_ERROR("> %d plane stages assigned\n",
> @@ -872,8 +839,6 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
>   		return -E2BIG;
>   	}
>   
> -	fmt = to_dpu_format(msm_framebuffer_format(new_plane_state->fb));
> -
>   	max_linewidth = pdpu->catalog->caps->max_linewidth;
>   
>   	drm_rect_rotate(&pipe_cfg->src_rect,
> @@ -882,6 +847,83 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
>   
>   	if ((drm_rect_width(&pipe_cfg->src_rect) > max_linewidth) ||
>   	     _dpu_plane_calc_clk(&crtc_state->adjusted_mode, pipe_cfg) > max_mdp_clk_rate) {
> +		if (drm_rect_width(&pipe_cfg->src_rect) > 2 * max_linewidth) {
> +			DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "invalid src " DRM_RECT_FMT " line:%u\n",
> +					DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->src_rect), max_linewidth);
> +			return -E2BIG;
> +		}
> +
> +		*r_pipe_cfg = *pipe_cfg;
> +		pipe_cfg->src_rect.x2 = (pipe_cfg->src_rect.x1 + pipe_cfg->src_rect.x2) >> 1;
> +		pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2 = (pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x1 + pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2) >> 1;
> +		r_pipe_cfg->src_rect.x1 = pipe_cfg->src_rect.x2;
> +		r_pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x1 = pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2;
> +	} else {
> +		memset(r_pipe_cfg, 0, sizeof(*r_pipe_cfg));
> +	}
> +
> +	drm_rect_rotate_inv(&pipe_cfg->src_rect,
> +			    new_plane_state->fb->width, new_plane_state->fb->height,
> +			    new_plane_state->rotation);
> +	if (r_pipe_cfg->src_rect.x1 != 0)
> +		drm_rect_rotate_inv(&r_pipe_cfg->src_rect,
> +				    new_plane_state->fb->width, new_plane_state->fb->height,
> +				    new_plane_state->rotation);
> +
> +	pstate->needs_qos_remap = drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipes(struct drm_plane *plane,
> +					struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> +					const struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct drm_plane_state *new_plane_state =
> +		drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state(state, plane);
> +	struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
> +	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(new_plane_state);
> +	struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe = &pstate->pipe;
> +	struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
> +	const struct dpu_format *fmt;
> +	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg = &pstate->pipe_cfg;
> +	struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *r_pipe_cfg = &pstate->r_pipe_cfg;
> +	uint32_t max_linewidth;
> +	unsigned int rotation;
> +	uint32_t supported_rotations;
> +	const struct dpu_sspp_cfg *pipe_hw_caps;
> +	const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks *sblk;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	pipe_hw_caps = pipe->sspp->cap;
> +	sblk = pipe->sspp->cap->sblk;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We already have verified scaling against platform limitations.
> +	 * Now check if the SSPP supports scaling at all.
> +	 */
> +	if (!sblk->scaler_blk.len &&
> +	    ((drm_rect_width(&new_plane_state->src) >> 16 !=
> +	      drm_rect_width(&new_plane_state->dst)) ||
> +	     (drm_rect_height(&new_plane_state->src) >> 16 !=
> +	      drm_rect_height(&new_plane_state->dst))))
> +		return -ERANGE;
> +
> +	pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> +	pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> +	r_pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> +	r_pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
> +
> +	fmt = to_dpu_format(msm_framebuffer_format(new_plane_state->fb));
> +
> +	max_linewidth = pdpu->catalog->caps->max_linewidth;
> +
> +	ret = dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(pdpu, pipe, pipe_cfg, fmt,
> +					  &crtc_state->adjusted_mode);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (r_pipe_cfg->src_rect.x1 != 0) {
>   		/*
>   		 * In parallel multirect case only the half of the usual width
>   		 * is supported for tiled formats. If we are here, we know that
> @@ -895,12 +937,6 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
>   			return -E2BIG;
>   		}
>   
> -		if (drm_rect_width(&pipe_cfg->src_rect) > 2 * max_linewidth) {
> -			DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "invalid src " DRM_RECT_FMT " line:%u\n",
> -					DRM_RECT_ARG(&pipe_cfg->src_rect), max_linewidth);
> -			return -E2BIG;
> -		}
> -
>   		if (drm_rect_width(&pipe_cfg->src_rect) != drm_rect_width(&pipe_cfg->dst_rect) ||
>   		    drm_rect_height(&pipe_cfg->src_rect) != drm_rect_height(&pipe_cfg->dst_rect) ||
>   		    (!test_bit(DPU_SSPP_SMART_DMA_V1, &pipe->sspp->cap->features) &&
> @@ -922,26 +958,6 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
>   		r_pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_1;
>   		r_pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_PARALLEL;
>   
> -		*r_pipe_cfg = *pipe_cfg;
> -		pipe_cfg->src_rect.x2 = (pipe_cfg->src_rect.x1 + pipe_cfg->src_rect.x2) >> 1;
> -		pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2 = (pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x1 + pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2) >> 1;
> -		r_pipe_cfg->src_rect.x1 = pipe_cfg->src_rect.x2;
> -		r_pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x1 = pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2;
> -	}
> -
> -	drm_rect_rotate_inv(&pipe_cfg->src_rect,
> -			    new_plane_state->fb->width, new_plane_state->fb->height,
> -			    new_plane_state->rotation);
> -	if (r_pipe->sspp)
> -		drm_rect_rotate_inv(&r_pipe_cfg->src_rect,
> -				    new_plane_state->fb->width, new_plane_state->fb->height,
> -				    new_plane_state->rotation);
> -
> -	ret = dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(pdpu, pipe, pipe_cfg, fmt, &crtc_state->adjusted_mode);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	if (r_pipe->sspp) {
>   		ret = dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(pdpu, r_pipe, r_pipe_cfg, fmt,
>   						  &crtc_state->adjusted_mode);
>   		if (ret)
> @@ -964,11 +980,45 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
>   	}
>   
>   	pstate->rotation = rotation;
> -	pstate->needs_qos_remap = drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> +				  struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct drm_plane_state *new_plane_state = drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state(state,
> +										 plane);
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane);
> +	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(new_plane_state);
> +	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms = _dpu_plane_get_kms(plane);
> +	struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe = &pstate->pipe;
> +	struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe;
> +	const struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = NULL;
> +
> +	if (new_plane_state->crtc)
> +		crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state,
> +							   new_plane_state->crtc);
> +
> +	if (pdpu->pipe != SSPP_NONE) {

This check was not present iirc, why did you have to add this?
RM will return the same SSPP unless freed. So why this additional check?

> +		pipe->sspp = dpu_rm_get_sspp(&dpu_kms->rm, pdpu->pipe);
> +		r_pipe->sspp = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!pipe->sspp)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ret = dpu_plane_atomic_check_nopipe(plane, new_plane_state, crtc_state);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (!new_plane_state->visible)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipes(plane, state, crtc_state);
> +}
> +
>   static void dpu_plane_flush_csc(struct dpu_plane *pdpu, struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe)
>   {
>   	const struct dpu_format *format =

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-05 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-14  0:02 [PATCH v4 00/13] drm/msm/dpu: support virtual wide planes Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] drm/msm/dpu: take plane rotation into account for " Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-30 22:51   ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] drm/msm/dpu: use drm_rect_fp_to_int() Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-30 23:14   ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] drm/msm/dpu: move pstate->pipe initialization to dpu_plane_atomic_check Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-31  0:28   ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] drm/msm/dpu: drop virt_formats from SSPP subblock configuration Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-31  0:32   ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] drm/msm/dpu: move scaling limitations out of the hw_catalog Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-31  1:02   ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-05-31  8:16     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-05-31 19:20       ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-05-31 19:45         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] drm/msm/dpu: split dpu_plane_atomic_check() Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-05 23:19   ` Abhinav Kumar [this message]
2024-06-05 23:32     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-05 23:47       ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-06-06  8:53         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-06  8:54           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] drm/msm/dpu: move rot90 checking to dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe() Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-05 23:34   ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] drm/msm/dpu: add support for virtual planes Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-03-14  8:04   ` [v4,08/13] " Sui Jingfeng
2024-06-06 22:21   ` [PATCH v4 08/13] " Abhinav Kumar
2024-06-07  7:16     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-07 19:22       ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-06-07 21:10         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-07 21:39           ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-06-07 22:26             ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-07 23:55               ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-06-08  0:57                 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-08  2:45                   ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-06-10 21:01                     ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] drm/msm/dpu: allow using two SSPP blocks for a single plane Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-10 20:19   ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] drm/msm/dpu: allow sharing SSPP between planes Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-11 23:12   ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-06-12  9:08     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-13  1:17       ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-06-13 10:05         ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-13 20:02           ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] drm/msm/dpu: create additional virtual planes Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-11 23:26   ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] drm/msm/dpu: allow sharing of blending stages Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-12  1:47   ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-06-12  8:50     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-03-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] drm/msm/dpu: include SSPP allocation state into the dumped state Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-11 23:43   ` Abhinav Kumar
2024-03-14  0:04 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] drm/msm/dpu: support virtual wide planes Dmitry Baryshkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=627dd526-2b56-2ecb-9011-4ec08bab454f@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox