Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@redhat.com>,
	Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@redhat.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] driver core: Set deferred probe timeout to 0 if modules are disabled
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 17:51:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <79f79051-8118-4735-67f2-74e8b6e1c010@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116163931.ob7szcnjx65c7gz7@halaney-x13s>

Hello Andrew,

Thanks for your feedback.

On 11/16/22 17:39, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 01:00:43PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> There is no point to schedule the work queue to timeout the deferred probe
>> if all the initcalls are done and modules are not enabled. The default for
>> this case is already 0 but can be overridden by the deferred_probe_timeout
>> parameter. Let's just disable to avoid queuing a work that is not needed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> (no changes since v1)
>>
>>  drivers/base/dd.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
>> index 040b4060f903..1e8f1afeac98 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
>> @@ -350,8 +350,10 @@ static int deferred_probe_initcall(void)
>>  	flush_work(&deferred_probe_work);
>>  	initcalls_done = true;
>>  
>> -	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES))
>> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)) {
>> +		driver_deferred_probe_timeout = 0;
>>  		fw_devlink_drivers_done();
>> +	}
>>  
> 
> Potentially a stupid suggestion, but would it make sense to take out
> the ability to actually set that param if !CONFIG_MODULES? Then
> driver_deferred_probe_timeout would be the default value already.
> 

Yes, I think it makes sense. I will do that in the next iteration.

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-16 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-16 11:53 [PATCH v2 0/4] driver core: Decouple device links enforcing and probe deferral timeouts Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] driver core: Make driver_deferred_probe_timeout a static variable Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 12:57   ` Andrew Halaney
2022-11-17 19:14   ` John Stultz
2022-12-12  8:50     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-12-12  8:59       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-12-12  9:06         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 12:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] driver core: Set deferred probe timeout to 0 if modules are disabled Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 16:39   ` Andrew Halaney
2022-11-16 16:51     ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2022-11-16 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] driver core: Add fw_devlink.timeout param to stop waiting for devlinks Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 16:09   ` Randy Dunlap
2022-11-16 19:05   ` Andrew Halaney
2022-11-17 15:19   ` Andrew Halaney
2022-11-17 18:55     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-17 19:07   ` John Stultz
2022-11-17 19:16     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] driver core: Disable driver deferred probe timeout by default Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-11-16 19:15   ` Andrew Halaney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=79f79051-8118-4735-67f2-74e8b6e1c010@redhat.com \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=eballetbo@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbrobinson@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=steev@kali.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox