From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@linaro.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
kees@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org,
konradybcio@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, gpiccoli@igalia.com,
pmladek@suse.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, john.ogness@linutronix.de,
senozhatsky@chromium.org, quic_mojha@quicinc.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] pstore: directly mapped regions
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 13:39:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <885a9312-484a-4b60-bec0-5adf8f1e4a0e@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59333d4aa8a3bb3222967d70d10d9288cece444c.camel@sipsolutions.net>
On 2/17/25 13:19, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 12:44 +0200, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>>
>> At this moment going through devcoredump is not something that impacts
>> the idea of the implementation.
>
> Yeah. I don't think it _should_ go through it at all.
>
>> The whole reason of going through it (because things work without it as
>> well), is to see whether this has any kind of impact or not, and if
>> there is any kind of fit/reason of going through it.
>
> So it's just a trial balloon?
Yes, that's why it's marked as an RFC.
>
>> Devcoredump is involved because the whole core registration is similar
>> to a core area that devcoredump could use.
>
> Yeah but ...
>
>> For example, would it be interesting to have a handler going through all
>> devices, and have the dump areas already registered ?
>> Meaning, when there is a request to generate a core dump, one could
>> directly dump this area instead of calling back the driver, and provide
>> that to the userspace instead of the driver calling the dev_coredumpv by
>> its own.
>
> I'll be blunt ... so you _really_ haven't understood devcoredump then?
>
> It's really not doing this. It's not meant to do this... It's intended
> to dump data from inside the device when the device crashes.
>
> Please remove devcoredump involvement from this series.
Thank you for your feedback.
>
> johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-17 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-17 10:16 [RFC][PATCH 00/10] pstore: directly mapped regions Eugen Hristev
2025-02-17 10:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/10] pstore/zone: move pstore_device_info into zone header Eugen Hristev
2025-02-17 10:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/10] pstore/smem: add new pstore/smem type of pstore Eugen Hristev
2025-02-17 10:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/10] pstore/zone: introduce directly mapped zones Eugen Hristev
2025-02-17 10:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/10] qcom: smem: add pstore smem backend Eugen Hristev
2025-02-17 10:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/10] pstore: implement core area registration Eugen Hristev
2025-02-17 10:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/10] qcom: smem: enable smem pstore backend Eugen Hristev
2025-02-17 10:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/10] printk: export symbols for buffer address and length functions Eugen Hristev
2025-02-18 8:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-18 8:58 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2025-02-18 9:11 ` Eugen Hristev
2025-02-17 10:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/10] pstore: register kmsg into directly mapped zones if available Eugen Hristev
2025-02-17 10:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/10] devcoredump: add devcd_{un}register_core_area API Eugen Hristev
2025-02-17 10:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/10] rng: qcom_rng: EXAMPLE: registering dev structure Eugen Hristev
2025-02-17 10:23 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/10] pstore: directly mapped regions Johannes Berg
2025-02-17 10:44 ` Eugen Hristev
2025-02-17 11:19 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-17 11:39 ` Eugen Hristev [this message]
2025-02-17 11:43 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=885a9312-484a-4b60-bec0-5adf8f1e4a0e@linaro.org \
--to=eugen.hristev@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@quicinc.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=quic_mojha@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox