Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: iq9: Introduce new memory map for qcs9100/qcs9075

[Wasim Nazir <quic_wasimn@quicinc.com>]

On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 09:54:38PM +0530, Wasim Nazir wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 04:21:46PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 03:05:55PM +0530, Wasim Nazir wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 10:41:39AM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 02:58:45PM +0530, Wasim Nazir wrote:
> > > > > From: Pratyush Brahma <quic_pbrahma@quicinc.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > SA8775P has a memory map which caters to the auto specific requirements.
> > > > 
> > > > I thought SA8775P was the IoT platform and SA8255P was the automotive
> > > > one. Has this changed?
> > > 
> > > Both SA8775P & SA8255P is for auto but former one is non-SCMI based while
> > > the later one is SCMI based chip.
> > > 
> > > Only IQ9 series of chips (QCS9100 & QCS9075) are for IOT.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > QCS9100 & QCS9075 are its IOT variants (with marketing name as IQ9) which
> > > > > inherit the memory map of SA8775P require a slightly different memory
> > > > > map as compared to SA8775P auto parts.
> > > > > This new memory map is applicable for all the IoT boards which inherit
> > > > > the initial SA8775P memory map. This is not applicable for non-IoT
> > > > 
> > > > Is there are platform out there that actually uses the "initial SA8775P
> > > > memory map"?
> > > 
> > > Yes currently sa8775p-ride and sa8775p-ride-r3 are using initial memory
> > > map.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > boards.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Some new carveouts (viz. gunyah_md and a few pil dtb carveouts) have been
> > > > > introduced as part of firmware updates for IoT. The size and base address
> > > > > have been updated for video PIL carveout compared to SA8775P since it is
> > > > > being brought up for the first time on IoT boards. The base addresses
> > > > > of the rest of the PIL carveouts have been updated to accommodate the
> > > > > change in size of video since PIL regions are relocatable and their
> > > > > functionality is not impacted due to this change. The size of camera
> > > > > pil has also been increased without breaking any feature.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The size of trusted apps carveout has also been reduced since it is
> > > > > sufficient to meet IoT requirements. Also, audio_mdf_mem & tz_ffi_mem
> > > > > carveout and its corresponding scm reference has been removed as these
> > > > > are not required for IoT parts.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Incorporate these changes in the updated memory map.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pratyush Brahma <quic_pbrahma@quicinc.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Prakash Gupta <quic_guptap@quicinc.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wasim Nazir <quic_wasimn@quicinc.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  .../boot/dts/qcom/iq9-reserved-memory.dtsi    | 113 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 113 insertions(+)
> > > > >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/iq9-reserved-memory.dtsi
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/iq9-reserved-memory.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/iq9-reserved-memory.dtsi
> > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > index 000000000000..ff2600eb5e3d
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/iq9-reserved-memory.dtsi
> > > > 
> > > > The naming convention is <soc>-<something>.dtsi and I don't see any
> > > > other uses of the "iq9" naming.
> > > 
> > > As this new memory map is common for IQ9 series of SoC (QCS9100 &
> > > QCS9075), so we have used its common name.
> > 
> > IQ9 name is not known or visible outside of this commit.
> 
> Are you referring to add the same in cover-letter?
> 
> > 
> > > Once the DT structure for QCS9100 is refactored, we would update this
> > > common file there.
> > 
> > Can you refactor it first?
> 
> This refactoring involves changes in all the ride/ride-r3 boards which
> are based on sa8775p & qcs9100. Even though we had sent v0[1] but we still
> need to conclude on the final structure. Since, ethernet is broken in upstream,
> we are working on its fix before sending another series.
> 
> Hence, we want to proceed for iq9075-evk for now and once qcs9100 is
> finalized, we can use the memory-map there.
> 
> But to avoid this dependency and to proceed with iq9075-evk alone,
> I can rename it to qcs9075-reserved-memory.dtsi.
> 
> Let me know if that works here.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250507065116.353114-1-quic_wasimn@quicinc.com/

Hi Dmitry,

Shall I proceed with qcs9075-reserved-memory.dtsi or do you have any
other suggestion that we should discuss?

Aparently, this series is for qcs9075 only so using exact (not common)
name also aligns the naming format.

> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry
> 
> Regards,
> Wasim

-- 
Regards,
Wasim