[PATCH] dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-tsens: document the Kaanapali Temperature Sensor

[PATCH] dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-tsens: document the Kaanapali Temperature Sensor

[Jingyi Wang]

From: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <manaf.pallikunhi@oss.qualcomm.com>

Document the Temperature Sensor (TSENS) on the Kaanapali Platform.

Signed-off-by: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <manaf.pallikunhi@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
index f65dc829574c..20b9816754f2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ properties:
       - description: v2 of TSENS
         items:
           - enum:
+              - qcom,kaanapali-tsens
               - qcom,milos-tsens
               - qcom,msm8953-tsens
               - qcom,msm8996-tsens

---
base-commit: ae2d20002576d2893ecaff25db3d7ef9190ac0b6
change-id: 20250917-knp-tsens-8f03e7cb07af

Best regards,
-- 
Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com>

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-tsens: document the Kaanapali Temperature Sensor

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 25/09/2025 08:37, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> From: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <manaf.pallikunhi@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> Document the Temperature Sensor (TSENS) on the Kaanapali Platform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manaf Meethalavalappu Pallikunhi <manaf.pallikunhi@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---

No, conflicting patch with Kaanapali, without any reason. Squash the
patches.

This entire split is just huge churn, huge duplication of work and quite
a lot of review put onto the community. You should have coordinated your
work better.

I am disappointed because you just don't think about the reviewing
process, about what maintainers should do with that. You just send what
was told you to send.

Explain to us - why do we want to have two 99% same patches sent the
SAME DAY, from the same company, sent in completely separate patchsets
so any simplified review will not be possible, and do same work - review
and applying - twice, instead of having only one?

Why maintainers should accept this?

Best regards,
Krzysztof