Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, wufan@codeaurora.org,
	pratanan@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/8] qaic: Implement data path
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 10:12:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d34d726d-7911-824d-82ac-34358874b103@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200514155645.GB2963499@kroah.com>

On 5/14/2020 9:56 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:06:53AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>> On 5/14/2020 8:14 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:07:43AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>>>> +struct qaic_execute {
>>>> +	__u16		ver;    /* struct version, must be 1 */
>>>
>>> No need for structures to be versioned.  If you change something, then
>>> add a new ioctl if you really needed it.
>>
>> Huh.  We had thought the botching ioctls document advised having a version,
>> but as I double check that document, it infact does not.
>>
>> Will remove.
> 
> Thanks, you can also remove the "reserved" variables as well as those
> will not be needed either.

Are you sure?

Documentation/process/botching-up-ioctls.rst
Starting at Line 38:

"Pad the entire struct to a multiple of 64-bits if the structure 
contains 64-bit types - the structure size will otherwise differ on 
32-bit versus 64-bit. Having a different structure size hurts when 
passing arrays of structures to the kernel, or if the kernel checks the 
structure size, which e.g. the drm core does."

The "reserved" variables seem to be in line with that.

-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-14 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-14 14:07 [RFC PATCH 0/8] Qualcomm Cloud AI 100 driver Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-14 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] qaic: Add skeleton driver Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-15  0:43   ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-15  6:37     ` Greg KH
2020-05-14 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] qaic: Add and init a basic mhi controller Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-14 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] qaic: Create char dev Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-14 14:12   ` Greg KH
2020-05-14 15:05     ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-14 15:56       ` Greg KH
2020-05-14 16:24         ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-15 21:08           ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-16  7:01             ` Greg KH
2020-05-16 21:29               ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-17  7:14                 ` Greg KH
2020-05-17 19:37                   ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-14 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] qaic: Implement control path Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-14 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] qaic: Implement data path Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-14 14:14   ` Greg KH
2020-05-14 15:06     ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-14 15:56       ` Greg KH
2020-05-14 16:12         ` Jeffrey Hugo [this message]
2020-05-14 16:37           ` Greg KH
2020-05-14 16:45             ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-14 21:36   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-14 22:06     ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-14 22:20       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-14 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] qaic: Implement PCI link status error handlers Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-14 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] qaic: Implement MHI error status handler Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-14 14:07 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for QAIC driver Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-19  5:08 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] Qualcomm Cloud AI 100 driver Dave Airlie
2020-05-19 14:57   ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-19 17:41     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-19 18:07       ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-19 18:12         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-19 18:26           ` Jeffrey Hugo
2020-05-20  5:32             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-19 17:33   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-19  6:57 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-05-19 14:16   ` Jeffrey Hugo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d34d726d-7911-824d-82ac-34358874b103@codeaurora.org \
    --to=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=pratanan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=wufan@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox