Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/5] thermal: qcom: Add support for MBG thermal monitoring

[Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@quicinc.com>]

On 12/30/2024 7:36 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 30.12.2024 10:45 AM, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
>> On 12/13/2024 9:18 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 12.12.2024 5:11 PM, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
>>>> Add driver for the MBG thermal monitoring device. It monitors
>>>> the die temperature, and when there is a level 1 upper threshold
>>>> violation, it receives an interrupt over spmi. The driver reads
>>>> the fault status register and notifies thermal accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> +static const struct mbg_map_table map_table[] = {
>>> Is this peripheral/pmic-specific?
>>
>> Yes, peripheral specific.
> Okay, I asked a question that I don't recall what I meant by.
>
> To be clear, is this table specific to all instances of MBG on
> different kinds of PMIC7, or does it only apply to PM8775
> specifically?


No it is not specific to PM8775 pmic, it is specific to MBG peripheral.


>>>> +    /* minT    vtemp0    tc */
>>>> +    { -60000, 4337, 1967 },
>>>> +    { -40000, 4731, 1964 },
>>>> +    { -20000, 5124, 1957  },
>>>> +    { 0,      5515, 1949 },
>>>> +    { 20000,  5905, 1940 },
>>>> +    { 40000,  6293, 1930 },
>>>> +    { 60000,  6679, 1921 },
>>>> +    { 80000,  7064, 1910 },
>>>> +    { 100000, 7446, 1896 },
>>>> +    { 120000, 7825, 1878 },
>>>> +    { 140000, 8201, 1859 },
>>>> +};
> Konrad