From: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add SDHCI node
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 12:32:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb8f0d17-555d-d74f-8fe0-1e5da8b3feb9@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d606960d-8e0a-611b-579c-c49b5b970462@linaro.org>
On 5/20/2023 4:53 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
> On 19.05.2023 10:51, Komal Bajaj wrote:
>> Add sdhc node for eMMC on QDU1000 and QRU1000 SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000.dtsi | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000.dtsi
>> index 734438113bba..6113def66a08 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000.dtsi
>> @@ -19,6 +19,10 @@
>>
>> chosen: chosen { };
>>
>> + aliases {
>> + mmc0 = &sdhc_1; /*SDC1 eMMC slot*/
>> + };
>> +
>> cpus {
>> #address-cells = <2>;
>> #size-cells = <0>;
>> @@ -842,6 +846,62 @@
>> #hwlock-cells = <1>;
>> };
>>
>> + sdhc_1: mmc@8804000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,qdu1000-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x08804000 0x0 0x1000>,
>> + <0x0 0x08805000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> +
> confusing newline
Will remove it in the next patch set.
>> + reg-names = "hc", "cqhci";
>> +
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 207 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 223 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + interrupt-names = "hc_irq", "pwr_irq";
>> +
>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_SDCC5_AHB_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_SDCC5_APPS_CLK>,
> SDCC>5<?
These names are used in accordance with the clock hardware.
>
>> + <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>;
>> + clock-names = "iface", "core", "xo";
> Please keep one per line
Noted.
>
>> +
>> + /* Add dt entry for gcc hw reset */
>> + resets = <&gcc GCC_SDCC5_BCR>;
> 5?
Reason same as above.
>
>> +
>> + interconnects = <&system_noc MASTER_SDCC_1 0 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 0>,
>> + <&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC 0 &system_noc SLAVE_SDCC_2 0>;
>> + interconnect-names = "sdhc-ddr", "cpu-sdhc";
>> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd QDU1000_CX>;
>> + operating-points-v2 = <&sdhc1_opp_table>;
>> +
>> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x0080 0x0>;
> Please remove the leading zeroes from the stream id
Sure, will do so.
>
>
>> + dma-coherent;
>> +
>> + bus-width = <8>;
>
> ----
>> + non-removable;
>> + supports-cqe;
>> +
>> + no-sd;
>> + no-sdio;
>> +
>> + mmc-ddr-1_8v;
>> + mmc-hs200-1_8v;
>> + mmc-hs400-1_8v;
>> + mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe;
>> + cap-mmc-hw-reset;
> ----
> This bit is board-specific
Okay, will move these bits to board specific file.
>
>> +
>> + qcom,dll-config = <0x0007642c>;
>> + qcom,ddr-config = <0x80040868>;
>> +
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + sdhc1_opp_table: opp-table {
>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> +
>> + opp-384000000 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <384000000>;
>> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_min_svs>;
> You added interconnects, but not any opp-peak-kBps / opp-avg-kBps,
> presumably mistakengly?
>
> Also, 384Mhz + min_svs sounds a bit weird? Is that the correct
> level for this SoC?
Yes, you are right, this is wrong configuration, will correct it in the
next patch set.
Thanks
Komal
>
> Konrad
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> pdc: interrupt-controller@b220000 {
>> compatible = "qcom,qdu1000-pdc", "qcom,pdc";
>> reg = <0x0 0xb220000 0x0 0x30000>, <0x0 0x174000f0 0x0 0x64>;
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-22 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-19 8:51 [PATCH 0/4] arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: add SDHCI Komal Bajaj
2023-05-19 8:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Document the QDU1000/QRU1000 compatible Komal Bajaj
2023-05-19 10:07 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2023-05-19 11:39 ` Komal Bajaj
2023-05-19 15:56 ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-19 8:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add SDHCI node Komal Bajaj
2023-05-19 10:05 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2023-05-19 11:55 ` Komal Bajaj
2023-05-20 11:23 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-22 7:02 ` Komal Bajaj [this message]
2023-05-19 8:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Add SDHCI1 pin configuration to DTSI Komal Bajaj
2023-05-19 10:15 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2023-05-19 8:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000-idp: add SDHCI for emmc Komal Bajaj
2023-05-19 10:13 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2023-05-20 11:24 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-05-22 6:31 ` Komal Bajaj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fb8f0d17-555d-d74f-8fe0-1e5da8b3feb9@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox