From: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: simplify XO_BUFFER clocks definitions
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 11:05:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff241a30-c970-d347-5a68-18b79a730d8c@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221203175808.859067-12-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
On 12/3/22 11:58 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Remove the duplication between the names of the normal and active-only
> XO_BUFFER and XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL clocks by using preprocessor logic to
> add _a suffix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
This is nice. See two comments below.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> index cb47d69889fb..9f33dbd60e96 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> @@ -112,17 +112,17 @@
> __DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(_platform, _name, _active, type, r_id, \
> QCOM_RPM_SMD_KEY_STATE)
>
> -#define DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(_platform, _name, _active, r_id, r) \
> - __DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(_platform, _name, _active, \
> +#define DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(_platform, _name, r_id, r) \
> + __DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(_platform, _name, _name##_a, \
> QCOM_SMD_RPM_CLK_BUF_A, r_id, r, \
> QCOM_RPM_KEY_SOFTWARE_ENABLE)
>
> -#define DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(_platform, _name, _active, \
> +#define DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(_platform, _name, \
> r_id, r) \
Can the above line be merged with its predecessor?
(I now have looked at later patches, and I see you add a new argument
that makes this original alignment still make sense. If that's why
you didn't here, you've done the right thing.)
> - DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(_platform, _name, _active, \
> + DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(_platform, _name, \
> r_id, r); \
Same comment here.
> __DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(_platform, _name##_pin, \
> - _active##_pin, \
> + _name##_a##_pin, \
> QCOM_SMD_RPM_CLK_BUF_A, r_id, r, \
> QCOM_RPM_KEY_PIN_CTRL_CLK_BUFFER_ENABLE_KEY)
>
> @@ -456,28 +456,28 @@ DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(qcs404, qpic_clk, qpic_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_QPIC_CLK, 0);
>
> DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, qup_clk, qup_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK, 0);
>
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8916, bb_clk1, bb_clk1_a, 1, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8916, bb_clk2, bb_clk2_a, 2, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_a, 1, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_a, 2, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_a, 3, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8916, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_a, 4, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8916, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_a, 5, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, rf_clk3, rf_clk3_a, 6, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(qcs404, ln_bb_clk, ln_bb_clk_a, 8, 19200000);
> -
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(qcm2290, rf_clk3, rf_clk3_a, 6, 38400000);
> -
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_d0, cxo_d0_a, 1, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_d1, cxo_d1_a, 2, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_a0, cxo_a0_a, 4, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_a1, cxo_a1_a, 5, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_a2, cxo_a2_a, 6, 19200000);
> -
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, diff_clk, diff_clk_a, 7, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, div_clk1, div_clk1_a, 11, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, div_clk2, div_clk2_a, 12, 19200000);
> -DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8992, div_clk3, div_clk3_a, 13, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8916, bb_clk1, 1, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8916, bb_clk2, 2, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, ln_bb_clk1, 1, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, ln_bb_clk2, 2, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, ln_bb_clk3, 3, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8916, rf_clk1, 4, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8916, rf_clk2, 5, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, rf_clk3, 6, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(qcs404, ln_bb_clk, 8, 19200000);
> +
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(qcm2290, rf_clk3, 6, 38400000);
> +
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_d0, 1, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_d1, 2, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_a0, 4, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_a1, 5, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_a2, 6, 19200000);
> +
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, diff_clk, 7, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, div_clk1, 11, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, div_clk2, 12, 19200000);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8992, div_clk3, 13, 19200000);
>
> static struct clk_smd_rpm *msm8909_clks[] = {
> [RPM_SMD_PCNOC_CLK] = &msm8916_pcnoc_clk,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-03 17:57 [PATCH 00/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: drop platform names Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-03 17:57 ` [PATCH 01/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: remove duplication between sm6375 and sm6125 clocks Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:13 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:04 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-03 17:57 ` [PATCH 02/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: enable pin-controlled ln_bb_clk clocks on qcs404 Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:14 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:04 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-03 17:57 ` [PATCH 03/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: remove duplication between qcs404 and qcm2290 clocks Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:15 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:04 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-06 23:18 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-03 17:57 ` [PATCH 04/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: add missing ln_bb_clkN clocks Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:17 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:04 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-06 23:19 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-03 17:57 ` [PATCH 05/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: use msm8998_ln_bb_clk2 for qcm2290 SoC Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:18 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:04 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-03 17:57 ` [PATCH 06/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: rename msm8992_ln_bb_* clocks to qcs404_ln_bb_* Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:19 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:04 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-06 23:26 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-06 23:26 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-03 17:57 ` [PATCH 07/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: add XO_BUFFER clock for each XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL clock Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:20 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:04 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-03 17:58 ` [PATCH 08/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: drop the rpm_status_id field Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:21 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:04 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-05 21:38 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 21:54 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-03 17:58 ` [PATCH 09/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: move clock definitions together Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:23 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:04 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-03 17:58 ` [PATCH 10/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: rename some msm8974 active-only clocks Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:25 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:05 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-05 21:40 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-03 17:58 ` [PATCH 11/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: simplify XO_BUFFER clocks definitions Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:27 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:05 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2022-12-06 23:30 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-03 17:58 ` [PATCH 12/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: simplify SMD_RPM/_BRANCH/_QDSS clock definitions Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:28 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:05 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-03 17:58 ` [PATCH 13/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: rename SMD_RPM_BRANCH clock symbols Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:30 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:05 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-03 17:58 ` [PATCH 14/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: rename the qcm2290 rf_clk3 clocks Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:31 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:05 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-03 17:58 ` [PATCH 15/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: rename SMD_RPM_BUS clocks Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:34 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:05 ` Alex Elder
2022-12-05 21:42 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-03 17:58 ` [PATCH 16/16] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: remove usage of platform name Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-05 11:35 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-05 17:05 ` Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff241a30-c970-d347-5a68-18b79a730d8c@linaro.org \
--to=elder@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=quic_tdas@quicinc.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox