[PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support for AST2700

[Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>]

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support for AST2700
> 
> On 19/09/2024 09:13, Ryan Chen wrote:
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support for
> >> AST2700
> >>
> >> On 19/09/2024 08:05, Ryan Chen wrote:
> >>>>> diff --git
> >>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2x00-scu.yaml
> >>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2x00-scu.yaml
> >>>>> index 86ee69c0f45b..127a357051cd 100644
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2x00-scu.yaml
> >>>>> +++
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2x00-scu.yam
> >>>>> +++ l
> >>>>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ title: Aspeed System Control Unit
> >>>>>  description:
> >>>>>    The Aspeed System Control Unit manages the global behaviour of
> >>>>> the
> >>>> SoC,
> >>>>>    configuring elements such as clocks, pinmux, and reset.
> >>>>> +  In AST2700 SOC which has two soc connection, each soc have its
> >>>>> + own scu  register control, ast2700-scu0 for soc0, ast2700-scu1
> >>>>> + for
> >> soc1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  maintainers:
> >>>>>    - Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> @@ -21,6 +23,8 @@ properties:
> >>>>>            - aspeed,ast2400-scu
> >>>>>            - aspeed,ast2500-scu
> >>>>>            - aspeed,ast2600-scu
> >>>>> +          - aspeed,ast2700-scu0
> >>>>> +          - aspeed,ast2700-scu1
> >>>>>        - const: syscon
> >>>>>        - const: simple-mfd
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @@ -30,10 +34,12 @@ properties:
> >>>>>    ranges: true
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    '#address-cells':
> >>>>> -    const: 1
> >>>>> +    minimum: 1
> >>>>> +    maximum: 2
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    '#size-cells':
> >>>>> -    const: 1
> >>>>> +    minimum: 1
> >>>>> +    maximum: 2
> >>>>
> >>>> Why do the children have 64 bit addressing?
> >>>
> >>> AST2700 is 64bit address, so it also.
> >>
> >> But why do they need it?
> >>
> > Sorry, I may not understand your point.
> 
> I asked why do you think children require 64-bit addressing, instead of working
> with existing 32-bit address.
> 
> > Since address-cell = <2>, Do you mean size-cell still 1?
> 
> No... although that's another point, how bug address size is there? For the
> children?
> 
> > If yes. I do the dts check it need size-cells=<2>, when I do
> > address-cells = <2>
> 
> Well, I talk about bus and children addressing. It's kind of obvious that
> changing one property means using different reg...
> 
Understood your point, I don?t use so much for size, size-cell = <1> is enough, will keep <1>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof