* Relation of syscall names to System.map
@ 2007-04-10 10:01 Matthew Booth
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Matthew Booth @ 2007-04-10 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-audit
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 764 bytes --]
I was recently going through syscalls I'm auditing and matching them up
to symbols in System.map starting with 'sys_'. I noted that the two
don't appear to be completely related. The system in question is RHEL 4
x86_64. Specifically I noted:
* sys_stime is in System.map, but 'stime' is not recognised by auditctl
* sys_umount2 is not in System.map, but is recognised by auditctl
Am I looking for a relationship which doesn't exist? Is there a better
way to get a definitive, locally generated list of all auditable
syscalls on a particular machine?
Thanks,
Matt
--
Matthew Booth, RHCA, RHCSS
Red Hat, Global Professional Services
M: +44 (0)7977 267231
GPG ID: D33C3490
GPG FPR: 3733 612D 2D05 5458 8A8A 1600 3441 EA19 D33C 3490
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-04-10 17:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-10 10:01 Relation of syscall names to System.map Matthew Booth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox