public inbox for linux-audit@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: LC Bruzenak <lenny@magitekltd.com>
To: "Miloslav Trmač" <mitr@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle timestamp 0.0 in auparse, was Re: audit-viewer help needed
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:38:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222130317.6513.85.camel@homeserver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1222126221.2685.81.camel@amilo>


On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 23:30 +0000, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Hello,
> the attached patch modifies auparse not to handle timestamp 0.x
> specially by using out-of-band information (parse_state == EVENT_EMPTY)
> instead of assuming (au->le.e.sec == 0) has a special meaning.  As far
> as I can see, this the two conditions are equivalent if no event has a
> timestamp 0.x.
> 
> The patch also decreases the assumed minimal length of a timestamp.
> 
> I have tested this only minimally - I have checked that (make check)
> succeeds, and that audit-viewer doesn't crash on startup.
> 
> This patch fixes handling of the following Lenny's audit record:
> 
> > node=hugo type=AVC msg=audit(0.000:6760): avc:  denied  { recvfrom }
> > for  pid=2589 comm="lockd" saddr=127.0.0.1 src=687 daddr=127.0.0.1
> > dest=111 netif=lo scontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023
> > tcontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s15:c0.c1023 tclass=association
> 
> I'm curious how this audit record could have been created (notabile is
> that the previous record has a sequence ID 6758 and a reasonable
> timestamp).  Lenny, Steve, any ideas?
> 
> Thank you,
> 	Mirek

I assume the timestamp is punched in the kernel audit code.
I decided to go rule out aggregation error and went looking on the
originating machine. I found a couple more:

[root@hugo ~]# grep "(0.000:" /var/log/audit/audit.log*
/var/log/audit/audit.log.12:node=local-hugo type=AVC msg=audit(0.000:6760): avc:  denied  { recvfrom } for  pid=2589 comm="lockd" saddr=127.0.0.1 src=687 daddr=127.0.0.1 dest=111 netif=lo scontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s15:c0.c1023 tclass=association 
/var/log/audit/audit.log.12:node=local-hugo type=AVC msg=audit(0.000:381): avc:  denied  { read } for  pid=2594 comm="nfsd4" name="v4recovery" dev=dm-0 ino=34482 scontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s15:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_lib_nfs_t:s0 tclass=dir 
/var/log/audit/audit.log.12:node=local-hugo type=AVC msg=audit(0.000:5135): avc:  denied  { recvfrom } for  pid=2595 comm="lockd" saddr=127.0.0.1 src=701 daddr=127.0.0.1 dest=111 netif=lo scontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s15:c0.c1023 tclass=association 
/var/log/audit/audit.log.12:node=local-hugo type=AVC msg=audit(0.000:388): avc:  denied  { read } for  pid=2593 comm="nfsd4" name="v4recovery" dev=dm-0 ino=34482 scontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s15:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_lib_nfs_t:s0 tclass=dir 
/var/log/audit/audit.log.13:node=local-hugo type=AVC msg=audit(0.000:380): avc:  denied  { read } for  pid=2588 comm="nfsd4" name="v4recovery" dev=dm-0 ino=34482 scontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s15:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_lib_nfs_t:s0 tclass=dir 

They all appear to be AVCs on denied read/recvfom, maybe there is a
timestamp bug in there?

Let me know if I can supply any data/diagnostics. I'll have to leave the
kernel code to experts for now...

Thx!
LCB.

-- 
LC (Lenny) Bruzenak
lenny@magitekltd.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-23  0:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-19  0:02 audit-viewer help needed LC Bruzenak
     [not found] ` <1221812917.2947.10.camel@amilo>
     [not found]   ` <1221830658.6513.4.camel@homeserver>
2008-09-22 23:30     ` [PATCH] Handle timestamp 0.0 in auparse, was " Miloslav Trmač
2008-09-23  0:38       ` LC Bruzenak [this message]
2008-09-23  0:57         ` Miloslav Trmač
2008-09-23  1:04           ` LC Bruzenak
2008-10-18 15:51           ` Steve Grubb
2008-11-07 20:19       ` LC Bruzenak
2009-01-07 15:17         ` Account Lockouts Starr-Renee Corbin
2009-01-07 15:25           ` Steve Grubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1222130317.6513.85.camel@homeserver \
    --to=lenny@magitekltd.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=mitr@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox