From: LC Bruzenak <lenny@magitekltd.com>
To: "Miloslav Trmač" <mitr@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit <linux-audit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle timestamp 0.0 in auparse, was Re: audit-viewer help needed
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:19:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1226089188.7321.128.camel@homeserver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1222126221.2685.81.camel@amilo>
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 23:30 +0000, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Hello,
> the attached patch modifies auparse not to handle timestamp 0.x
> specially by using out-of-band information (parse_state == EVENT_EMPTY)
> instead of assuming (au->le.e.sec == 0) has a special meaning. As far
> as I can see, this the two conditions are equivalent if no event has a
> timestamp 0.x.
>
> The patch also decreases the assumed minimal length of a timestamp.
>
> I have tested this only minimally - I have checked that (make check)
> succeeds, and that audit-viewer doesn't crash on startup.
>
> This patch fixes handling of the following Lenny's audit record:
>
> > node=hugo type=AVC msg=audit(0.000:6760): avc: denied { recvfrom }
> > for pid=2589 comm="lockd" saddr=127.0.0.1 src=687 daddr=127.0.0.1
> > dest=111 netif=lo scontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0-s15:c0.c1023
> > tcontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s15:c0.c1023 tclass=association
>
> I'm curious how this audit record could have been created (notabile is
> that the previous record has a sequence ID 6758 and a reasonable
> timestamp). Lenny, Steve, any ideas?
>
> Thank you,
> Mirek
Steve, Mirek -
This patch didn't make it into the 1.7.9 code?
I have been running with it since its release.
Even if the kernel was patched I thought this was good.
Thx,
LCB.
--
LC (Lenny) Bruzenak
lenny@magitekltd.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-07 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-19 0:02 audit-viewer help needed LC Bruzenak
[not found] ` <1221812917.2947.10.camel@amilo>
[not found] ` <1221830658.6513.4.camel@homeserver>
2008-09-22 23:30 ` [PATCH] Handle timestamp 0.0 in auparse, was " Miloslav Trmač
2008-09-23 0:38 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-09-23 0:57 ` Miloslav Trmač
2008-09-23 1:04 ` LC Bruzenak
2008-10-18 15:51 ` Steve Grubb
2008-11-07 20:19 ` LC Bruzenak [this message]
2009-01-07 15:17 ` Account Lockouts Starr-Renee Corbin
2009-01-07 15:25 ` Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1226089188.7321.128.camel@homeserver \
--to=lenny@magitekltd.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=mitr@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox