From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] audit: fix incorrect order of log new and old feature
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:49:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1383234586.3510.4.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131031153945.GC3399@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 11:39 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 04:27:56PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> Gao,
>
> Could you provide some description, justification and references for
> each of the patches in this patchset please?
Gao, you may also included my Acked-by: on all three. I thought the
descriptions in the subject were enough, but if you can include a
sentence in the body that would be great.
>
> > ---
> > kernel/audit.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> > index 7c7c028..f16f835 100644
> > --- a/kernel/audit.c
> > +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> > @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static void audit_log_feature_change(int which, u32 old_feature, u32 new_feature
> > struct audit_buffer *ab;
> >
> > ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_FEATURE_CHANGE);
> > - audit_log_format(ab, "feature=%s new=%d old=%d old_lock=%d new_lock=%d res=%d",
> > + audit_log_format(ab, "feature=%s old=%d new=%d old_lock=%d new_lock=%d res=%d",
> > audit_feature_names[which], !!old_feature, !!new_feature,
> > !!old_lock, !!new_lock, res);
> > audit_log_end(ab);
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
>
> - RGB
>
> --
> Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com>
> Senior Software Engineer
> Kernel Security
> AMER ENG Base Operating Systems
> Remote, Ottawa, Canada
> Voice: +1.647.777.2635
> Internal: (81) 32635
> Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-31 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-31 8:27 [PATCH 1/3] audit: fix incorrect order of log new and old feature Gao feng
2013-10-31 8:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] audit: don't generate audit feature changed log when audit disabled Gao feng
2013-10-31 8:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] audit: use old_lock in audit_set_feature Gao feng
2013-10-31 15:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] audit: fix incorrect order of log new and old feature Richard Guy Briggs
2013-10-31 15:49 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2013-11-01 0:55 ` Gao feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1383234586.3510.4.camel@localhost \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox