From: Klaus Weidner <klaus@atsec.com>
To: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPC_SET_PERM cleanup
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 09:51:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060509145139.GA31457@w-m-p.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <445BBCC5.3010306@hp.com>
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 04:59:49PM -0400, Linda Knippers wrote:
> Steve Grubb wrote:
> > This patch deletes the context string out of this record. Are we losing
> > anything important?
>
> I don't think so. I don't think the IPC_SET operations change the sid
> (at least I don't see it in the code) so its redundant with the obj information
> that's in the IPC record. If I'm missing it, I hope someone will point
> it out to me.
I agree that it's redundant. This is the sub-record that describes the
requested changes to object properties, and any information that can't be
changed through IPC_SET doesn't need to be in it. The information about
the current state of the object and subject is in separate sub-records.
-Klaus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-09 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-05 20:19 [PATCH] IPC_SET_PERM cleanup Linda Knippers
2006-05-05 20:42 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-05 20:59 ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-09 14:51 ` Klaus Weidner [this message]
2006-05-05 21:26 ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-08 18:29 ` Dustin Kirkland
2006-05-08 18:29 ` Dustin Kirkland
2006-05-08 19:06 ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-09 14:59 ` Klaus Weidner
2006-05-09 15:05 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-09 15:12 ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-09 15:21 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-09 15:34 ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-09 15:55 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-09 16:33 ` Klaus Weidner
2006-05-09 17:47 ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-09 18:15 ` Klaus Weidner
2006-05-09 18:27 ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-09 19:11 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-09 20:10 ` Klaus Weidner
2006-05-09 20:36 ` Klaus Weidner
2006-05-09 20:46 ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-10 14:02 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-10 16:29 ` Klaus Weidner
2006-05-10 17:02 ` Dustin Kirkland
2006-05-10 17:11 ` Klaus Weidner
2006-05-10 17:22 ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-10 17:29 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-10 18:10 ` Klaus Weidner
2006-05-10 17:28 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-10 18:05 ` Linda Knippers
2006-05-10 18:20 ` Steve Grubb
2006-05-09 15:53 ` Amy Griffis
2006-05-09 15:07 ` Steve Grubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060509145139.GA31457@w-m-p.com \
--to=klaus@atsec.com \
--cc=linda.knippers@hp.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox