From: "Timothy R. Chavez" <tinytim@us.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Viro <aviro@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: close(2) not being audited?
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:46:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070126174625.3f26c955@crumpet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070126232051.GG14621@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:20:51 -0500
Alexander Viro <aviro@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 05:01:12PM -0600, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> > > Please, define "access". Consider the following sequence:
> > > on April 1st:
> > > fd = open(foo, O_RDWR);
> > > p = mmap(..., fd, ...);
> > > close(fd);
> > > two days later: modify area pointed to by p
> > > a month later: munmap(p, ...);
> > >
> > > What do you want in the log? More specifically, _when_ do you want it?
> >
> > Write out a log when the last reference to the fd is put back... whether
> > that's from a close or an munmap.
>
> Sigh... One more time: there are two distinct classes of objects - opened
> files and opened descriptors. That's the point - by the time of munmap()
> there is no file descriptor at all. It's been gone for a month.
>
> Descriptor getting closed != file getting closed. If you are talking about
> the last reference to opened file - OK. But there won't necessary be
> any descriptors refering to it.
Yep, I was referring to last reference to opened file.
I'd hate to suggest adding a field to the file like "opened_as" which would
store the original fd it was assigned, but that would be enough to associate
the open() record and the final "close" record.
-tim
PS: Ugh, at this list for being write-protected :).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-26 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-28 21:58 close(2) not being audited? Todd, Charles
2006-12-30 14:36 ` Steve Grubb
2007-01-26 17:37 ` Steve Grubb
2007-01-26 18:03 ` John D. Ramsdell
2007-01-26 20:14 ` Wieprecht, Karen M.
2007-01-26 22:19 ` Alexander Viro
2007-01-26 23:00 ` Timothy R. Chavez
2007-01-26 23:01 ` Timothy R. Chavez
2007-01-26 23:20 ` Alexander Viro
2007-01-26 23:46 ` Timothy R. Chavez [this message]
2007-01-28 21:40 ` James Antill
2007-01-29 20:19 ` Timothy R. Chavez
2007-01-26 23:29 ` Alexander Viro
2007-01-27 0:03 ` Timothy R. Chavez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070126174625.3f26c955@crumpet \
--to=tinytim@us.ibm.com \
--cc=aviro@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox