From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Audit issue
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 19:28:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711081928.07954.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711080959.31328.sgrubb@redhat.com>
On Thursday 08 November 2007 09:59:30 Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday 08 November 2007 09:56:51 Alexander Viro wrote:
> > Easy enough to test - boot with audit disabled, run benchmarks, enable
> > it, flush all caches (e.g. by memory pressure), rerun the benchmarks,
> > compare... I don't think it will be serious problem, but if it will
> > we can always look for trickier solutions.
>
> OK. I'll try to build a kernel and check this out. Might have some results
> later.
OK, had a chance to do testing. First, the patch works. It solves the problem
that was reported. Here's some performance numbers using the performance test
I have at http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/lspp-perf.tar.gz
without patch boot with audit=0
audit disabled: 38.9
audit enabled: 42.3
without patch boot with audit=1
audit disabled: 41.4
audit enabled: 42.9
with patch boot with audit=0
audit disabled: 38.6
audit enabled: 43.8
with patch boot with audit=1
audit disabled: 44.2
audit enabled: 44.6
So, when audit is enabled at boot. There is virtually no performance
difference between enabled and not. The old way, we had a 4% performance
improvement when audit was disabled. Looking at the audit=0 case, there is
about a 3.5% performance hit when audit is enabled with the new patch. The
old way, audit disabled was always significantly faster ~ %4. With the patch
its only about 1% faster.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-09 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200710301248.24261.sgrubb@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <200710301907.29505.sgrubb@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20071030231525.GG12499@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <200710311740.19981.sgrubb@redhat.com>
2007-11-08 14:19 ` Audit issue Alexander Viro
2007-11-08 14:27 ` Steve Grubb
2007-11-08 14:32 ` Alexander Viro
2007-11-08 14:47 ` Steve Grubb
2007-11-08 14:56 ` Alexander Viro
2007-11-08 14:59 ` Steve Grubb
2007-11-09 0:28 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2007-11-08 14:35 ` Eric Paris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711081928.07954.sgrubb@redhat.com \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox