Re: Limiting SECCOMP audit events

[Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1343 bytes --]

On Thursday, December 14, 2017 7:42:26 AM EST Paul Moore wrote:
> >> Looking at the kernel code, it looks like the actions_logged knob
> >> isn't really intended to filter/drop seccomp events,
> > 
> > That's unfortunate. I thought this was a way to suppress generation of
> > events. We have a requirement that audit events be selective by the
> > administrator. We need a knob to drop some events. I guess, the only knob
> > right now is the exclude filter. That is probably too course.
> > 
> >> but rather force seccomp events to be loggged. Look at seccomp_log() to
> >> see what I mean; there is still a call to audit_seccomp() at the end.
> > 
> > Hmm. What do we do?
> 
> I imagine we could put together a rather coarse grained action filter,
> similar to what we have with "actions_logged" (maybe
> "actions_silent"?), and perhaps add some additional audit filters for
> seccomp for those who happen to have audit enabled.  Both should be
> relatively easy, the "actions_silent" field especially so.

OK. That would be helpful. This is eating up my log space. The biggest offenders 
seem to be doing trap kind of events. I suppose if an errno was returned the 
program would respond by erroring out. But since its a trap, I suspect something 
looks around at data and then OK's it to proceed on which results in another trap.

-Steve

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5065 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]