Linux-audit Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael C Thompson <thompsmc@us.ibm.com>
To: "Timothy R. Chavez" <tinytim@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Bypassing audit's file watches
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 11:08:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44AE8715.5040309@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1152287952.21687.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 10:58 -0400, Steve wrote:
>> I have found that I can modify files that are being watched and audit 
>> not catch it (ie. no events are dispatched).  When monitoring a file for 
>> all system calls, I can:
>>
>> echo "" > /file/to/watch
>>
>> or
>>
>> cat some_file > /file/to/watch
>>
>> without generating audit events.  I assume this has to do with how the 
>> kernel handles re-direction.  Is it possible to catch these modifications?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve
> 
> What are your rules?  You should catch these on open()
> of /file/to/watch, right?
> 
> -tim

I am seeing this as well with the .42 kernel and audit-1.2.4-1. Not sure 
when this might have broken, but its broke now.

It seems if you set a watch on /file/to (to use your example above), 
then you are getting the opens that bash does, although the PATH record 
shows the item as "/file/to/watch".

So watching the parent directory will audit redirect shell magic, but 
watching the target of that redirection will not audit that same magic.

Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-07 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-07 14:58 Bypassing audit's file watches Steve
2006-07-07 15:59 ` Timothy R. Chavez
2006-07-07 16:08   ` Michael C Thompson [this message]
2006-07-07 16:20     ` Michael C Thompson
2006-07-08  2:00 ` Amy Griffis
2006-07-10 11:32   ` Steve
2006-07-10 22:31     ` Amy Griffis
2006-07-11 15:07       ` Michael C Thompson
2006-07-10 15:16   ` Timothy R. Chavez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44AE8715.5040309@us.ibm.com \
    --to=thompsmc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=tinytim@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox