From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: audit.rules file [Was: audit 2.3 released]
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 09:17:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6136940.FpU5ZKyNch@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130505114357.7790a544@fornost.bigon.be>
Hello,
On Sunday, May 05, 2013 11:43:57 AM Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > Several people have asked for a way to deposit rules into a directory
> > so that based on what is installed, rules can also be added. This
> > makes it easier to have a core system that gets packages, config, and
> > files added to make it a different kind of server or desktop. My
> > guess is that it will be mostly used to add watches on setuid apps
> > which can differ from machine type to machine type.
> >
> > The place where these rules are stored is /etc/audit/rules.d.
> > Compiling rules from that directory will result in a new file being
> > written to /etc/audit/audit.rules. That means it can overwrite
> > existing rules. Since we don't want that to happen by accident,
> > augenrules is disabled by default.
>
> [...]
>
> The make install rule is now installing audit.rules in
> the /etc/audit/rules.d directory.
>
> What would happen on fresh installation if augenrules call is disabled
> and that /etc/audit/audit.rules is not existing?
>
> Will /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules be called as a fallback? Or should
> distributions take care of shipping both /etc/audit/audit.rules
> and /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules?
>
> What do you think?
What I did in Fedora is to add a post install action like this:
%post
# Copy default rules into place on new installation
if [ ! -e /etc/audit/audit.rules ] ; then
cp /etc/audit/rules.d/audit.rules /etc/audit/audit.rules
fi
This way if its a new install, you get a copy of the rules and if there are
any previously existing rules, they are not overwritten.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-06 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-01 14:29 audit 2.3 released Steve Grubb
2013-05-01 19:05 ` explanation/translation of auditd exit codes Vaughn, Chad M
2013-05-01 19:15 ` Peter Moody
2013-05-01 20:45 ` Eric Paris
2013-05-01 20:52 ` Vaughn, Chad M
2013-05-01 20:16 ` Smith, Gary R
2013-05-05 9:43 ` audit.rules file [Was: audit 2.3 released] Laurent Bigonville
2013-05-05 13:32 ` Burn Alting
2013-05-06 13:17 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2013-05-06 14:02 ` Laurent Bigonville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6136940.FpU5ZKyNch@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox