From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed reason field in audit signal logging
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:07:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6754825.LGliJv8PoR@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3543583.YTj3YxNvnl@x2>
On Thursday, November 07, 2013 11:11:09 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Thursday, November 07, 2013 10:42:21 AM Eric Paris wrote:
> > > I am confused. This is the abnormal end event I have:
> > >
> > >
> > > type=ANOM_ABEND msg=audit(1303339663.307:142): auid=4325 uid=0 gid=0
> > > ses=1
> > > subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0 pid=3775 comm="aureport"
> > > sig=11>
> > >
> > >
> > > Why / when did we start adding text explanations? We should not do that.
> > > We didn't have it before and it should not have been added. The signal
> > > number is enough to identify the problem.
> >
> > We started adding a reason when seccomp started sending ANOM_ABEND
> > events as well. It doesn't do so with a signal. Agreed, the " " is/was
> > a bad idea...
>
> Does seccomp still send these? I see there is an AUDIT_SECCOMP event being
> sent by __audit_seccomp(). Does seccomp do anything with ABEND at this
> point?
As far as I can see via grepping around, seccomp does not call
audit_log_abend(). As a matter of fact, only audit_core_dumps() does. meaning
there is no reason for audit_log_abend anymore. Its code can be pushed back
into audit_core_dumps() and the reason= can be removed entirely.
-Steve
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-07 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-07 13:39 [PATCH] Fixed reason field in audit signal logging Paul Davies C
2013-11-07 14:43 ` Eric Paris
2013-11-07 14:52 ` LC Bruzenak
2013-11-07 15:05 ` Steve Grubb
2013-11-07 15:13 ` LC Bruzenak
2013-11-07 15:42 ` Eric Paris
2013-11-07 15:51 ` Paul Davies C
2013-11-07 15:53 ` Eric Paris
2013-11-07 16:00 ` Paul Davies C
2013-11-07 16:05 ` Eric Paris
2013-11-07 16:11 ` Steve Grubb
2013-11-07 18:07 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6754825.LGliJv8PoR@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox