* [PATCH 1/3] bcache: avoid invalidating buckets in use @ 2024-11-19 3:28 mingzhe.zou 2024-11-19 3:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] bcache: fix io error during cache read race mingzhe.zou 2024-11-19 3:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] bcache: remove unused parameters mingzhe.zou 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: mingzhe.zou @ 2024-11-19 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: colyli; +Cc: linux-bcache, dongsheng.yang, zoumingzhe From: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@easystack.cn> If the bucket was reused while our bio was in flight, we might have read the wrong data. Currently, we will reread the data from the backing device. This not only reduces performance, but also makes the process more complex. When the bucket is in use, we hope not to reclaim it. Signed-off-by: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@easystack.cn> --- drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++--------- drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c index da50f6661bae..32f65d6fc906 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c @@ -134,25 +134,39 @@ bool bch_can_invalidate_bucket(struct cache *ca, struct bucket *b) !atomic_read(&b->pin) && can_inc_bucket_gen(b)); } -void __bch_invalidate_one_bucket(struct cache *ca, struct bucket *b) +bool __bch_invalidate_one_bucket(struct cache *ca, struct bucket *b) { lockdep_assert_held(&ca->set->bucket_lock); BUG_ON(GC_MARK(b) && GC_MARK(b) != GC_MARK_RECLAIMABLE); + /* + * If the bucket was reused while read bio was in flight, it will + * reread the data from the backing device. This will increase latency + * and cause other errors. When b->pin is not 0, do not invalidate + * the bucket. + */ + + b->invalidating = 1; + + if (atomic_inc_return(&b->pin) > 1) { + atomic_dec(&b->pin); + return false; + } + if (GC_SECTORS_USED(b)) trace_bcache_invalidate(ca, b - ca->buckets); bch_inc_gen(ca, b); b->prio = INITIAL_PRIO; - atomic_inc(&b->pin); b->reclaimable_in_gc = 0; + b->invalidating = 0; + return true; } static void bch_invalidate_one_bucket(struct cache *ca, struct bucket *b) { - __bch_invalidate_one_bucket(ca, b); - - fifo_push(&ca->free_inc, b - ca->buckets); + if (bch_can_invalidate_bucket(ca, b) && __bch_invalidate_one_bucket(ca, b)) + fifo_push(&ca->free_inc, b - ca->buckets); } /* @@ -253,8 +267,7 @@ static void invalidate_buckets_fifo(struct cache *ca) b = ca->buckets + ca->fifo_last_bucket++; - if (bch_can_invalidate_bucket(ca, b)) - bch_invalidate_one_bucket(ca, b); + bch_invalidate_one_bucket(ca, b); if (++checked >= ca->sb.nbuckets) { ca->invalidate_needs_gc = 1; @@ -279,8 +292,7 @@ static void invalidate_buckets_random(struct cache *ca) b = ca->buckets + n; - if (bch_can_invalidate_bucket(ca, b)) - bch_invalidate_one_bucket(ca, b); + bch_invalidate_one_bucket(ca, b); if (++checked >= ca->sb.nbuckets / 2) { ca->invalidate_needs_gc = 1; diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h index 785b0d9008fa..2777d72e1038 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ struct bucket { uint8_t last_gc; /* Most out of date gen in the btree */ uint16_t gc_mark; /* Bitfield used by GC. See below for field */ uint16_t reclaimable_in_gc:1; + uint16_t invalidating:1; }; /* @@ -981,7 +982,7 @@ uint8_t bch_inc_gen(struct cache *ca, struct bucket *b); void bch_rescale_priorities(struct cache_set *c, int sectors); bool bch_can_invalidate_bucket(struct cache *ca, struct bucket *b); -void __bch_invalidate_one_bucket(struct cache *ca, struct bucket *b); +bool __bch_invalidate_one_bucket(struct cache *ca, struct bucket *b); void __bch_bucket_free(struct cache *ca, struct bucket *b); void bch_bucket_free(struct cache_set *c, struct bkey *k); -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] bcache: fix io error during cache read race 2024-11-19 3:28 [PATCH 1/3] bcache: avoid invalidating buckets in use mingzhe.zou @ 2024-11-19 3:28 ` mingzhe.zou 2024-11-22 0:21 ` kernel test robot 2024-11-22 0:21 ` kernel test robot 2024-11-19 3:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] bcache: remove unused parameters mingzhe.zou 1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: mingzhe.zou @ 2024-11-19 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: colyli; +Cc: linux-bcache, dongsheng.yang, zoumingzhe From: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@easystack.cn> In our production environment, bcache returned IO_ERROR(errno=-5). These errors always happen during 1M read IO under high pressure and without any message log. When the error occurred, we stopped all reading and writing and used 1M read IO to read the entire disk without any errors. Later we found that cache_read_races of cache_set is non-zero. If a large (1M) read bio is split into two or more bios, when one bio reads dirty data, s->read_dirty_data will be set to true and remain. If the bucket was reused while our subsequent read bio was in flight, the read will be unrecoverable(cannot read data from backing). This patch increases the count for bucket->pin to prevent the bucket from being reclaimed and reused. Signed-off-by: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@easystack.cn> --- drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c index af345dc6fde1..3e76ae687045 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c @@ -502,12 +502,8 @@ static void bch_cache_read_endio(struct bio *bio) struct closure *cl = bio->bi_private; struct search *s = container_of(cl, struct search, cl); - /* - * If the bucket was reused while our bio was in flight, we might have - * read the wrong data. Set s->error but not error so it doesn't get - * counted against the cache device, but we'll still reread the data - * from the backing device. - */ + BUG_ON(ptr_stale(s->iop.c, &b->key, 0)); // bucket should not be reused + atomic_dec(&PTR_BUCKET(s->iop.c, &b->key, 0)->pin); if (bio->bi_status) s->iop.status = bio->bi_status; @@ -520,6 +516,8 @@ static void bch_cache_read_endio(struct bio *bio) bch_bbio_endio(s->iop.c, bio, bio->bi_status, "reading from cache"); } +static void backing_request_endio(struct bio *bio); + /* * Read from a single key, handling the initial cache miss if the key starts in * the middle of the bio @@ -529,7 +527,6 @@ static int cache_lookup_fn(struct btree_op *op, struct btree *b, struct bkey *k) struct search *s = container_of(op, struct search, op); struct bio *n, *bio = &s->bio.bio; struct bkey *bio_key; - unsigned int ptr; if (bkey_cmp(k, &KEY(s->iop.inode, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector, 0)) <= 0) return MAP_CONTINUE; @@ -553,20 +550,39 @@ static int cache_lookup_fn(struct btree_op *op, struct btree *b, struct bkey *k) if (!KEY_SIZE(k)) return MAP_CONTINUE; - /* XXX: figure out best pointer - for multiple cache devices */ - ptr = 0; + atomic_inc(&PTR_BUCKET(s->iop.c, k, 0)->pin); - PTR_BUCKET(b->c, k, ptr)->prio = INITIAL_PRIO; - - if (KEY_DIRTY(k)) - s->read_dirty_data = true; + PTR_BUCKET(b->c, k, 0)->prio = INITIAL_PRIO; n = bio_next_split(bio, min_t(uint64_t, INT_MAX, KEY_OFFSET(k) - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector), GFP_NOIO, &s->d->bio_split); +retry: + /* + * If the bucket was reused while our bio was in flight, we might have + * read the wrong data. Set s->cache_read_races and reread the data + * from the backing device. + */ + if (ptr_stale(s->iop.c, k, 0)) { + if (PTR_BUCKET(b->c, k, 0)->invalidating) + goto retry; + + atomic_dec(&PTR_BUCKET(s->iop.c, k, 0)->pin); + atomic_long_inc(&s->iop.c->cache_read_races); + pr_warn("%pU cache read race count: %lu", s->iop.c->sb.set_uuid, + atomic_long_read(&s->iop.c->cache_read_races)); + + n->bi_end_io = backing_request_endio; + n->bi_private = &s->cl; + + /* I/O request sent to backing device */ + closure_bio_submit(s->iop.c, n, &s->cl); + return n == bio ? MAP_DONE : MAP_CONTINUE; + } + bio_key = &container_of(n, struct bbio, bio)->key; - bch_bkey_copy_single_ptr(bio_key, k, ptr); + bch_bkey_copy_single_ptr(bio_key, k, 0); bch_cut_front(&KEY(s->iop.inode, n->bi_iter.bi_sector, 0), bio_key); bch_cut_back(&KEY(s->iop.inode, bio_end_sector(n), 0), bio_key); -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] bcache: fix io error during cache read race 2024-11-19 3:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] bcache: fix io error during cache read race mingzhe.zou @ 2024-11-22 0:21 ` kernel test robot 2024-11-22 0:21 ` kernel test robot 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: kernel test robot @ 2024-11-22 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mingzhe.zou, colyli Cc: oe-kbuild-all, linux-bcache, dongsheng.yang, zoumingzhe Hi, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on next-20241121] [also build test ERROR on v6.12] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/mingzhe-zou-easystack-cn/bcache-fix-io-error-during-cache-read-race/20241121-142652 base: next-20241121 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119032852.2511-2-mingzhe.zou%40easystack.cn patch subject: [PATCH 2/3] bcache: fix io error during cache read race config: arc-randconfig-001-20241122 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241122/202411220800.SWuw4yAb-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241122/202411220800.SWuw4yAb-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411220800.SWuw4yAb-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:22, from arch/arc/include/asm/bug.h:30, from include/linux/bug.h:5, from include/linux/thread_info.h:13, from include/asm-generic/current.h:6, from arch/arc/include/asm/current.h:20, from include/linux/sched.h:12, from include/linux/mempool.h:8, from include/linux/bio.h:8, from drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h:181, from drivers/md/bcache/request.c:10: drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function 'cache_lookup_fn': >> drivers/md/bcache/request.c:573:67: error: 'struct cache_set' has no member named 'sb' 573 | pr_warn("%pU cache read race count: %lu", s->iop.c->sb.set_uuid, | ^~ include/linux/printk.h:473:33: note: in definition of macro 'printk_index_wrap' 473 | _p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:554:9: note: in expansion of macro 'printk' 554 | printk(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~ drivers/md/bcache/request.c:573:17: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_warn' 573 | pr_warn("%pU cache read race count: %lu", s->iop.c->sb.set_uuid, | ^~~~~~~ vim +573 drivers/md/bcache/request.c 520 521 /* 522 * Read from a single key, handling the initial cache miss if the key starts in 523 * the middle of the bio 524 */ 525 static int cache_lookup_fn(struct btree_op *op, struct btree *b, struct bkey *k) 526 { 527 struct search *s = container_of(op, struct search, op); 528 struct bio *n, *bio = &s->bio.bio; 529 struct bkey *bio_key; 530 531 if (bkey_cmp(k, &KEY(s->iop.inode, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector, 0)) <= 0) 532 return MAP_CONTINUE; 533 534 if (KEY_INODE(k) != s->iop.inode || 535 KEY_START(k) > bio->bi_iter.bi_sector) { 536 unsigned int bio_sectors = bio_sectors(bio); 537 unsigned int sectors = KEY_INODE(k) == s->iop.inode 538 ? min_t(uint64_t, INT_MAX, 539 KEY_START(k) - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector) 540 : INT_MAX; 541 int ret = s->d->cache_miss(b, s, bio, sectors); 542 543 if (ret != MAP_CONTINUE) 544 return ret; 545 546 /* if this was a complete miss we shouldn't get here */ 547 BUG_ON(bio_sectors <= sectors); 548 } 549 550 if (!KEY_SIZE(k)) 551 return MAP_CONTINUE; 552 553 atomic_inc(&PTR_BUCKET(s->iop.c, k, 0)->pin); 554 555 PTR_BUCKET(b->c, k, 0)->prio = INITIAL_PRIO; 556 557 n = bio_next_split(bio, min_t(uint64_t, INT_MAX, 558 KEY_OFFSET(k) - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector), 559 GFP_NOIO, &s->d->bio_split); 560 561 retry: 562 /* 563 * If the bucket was reused while our bio was in flight, we might have 564 * read the wrong data. Set s->cache_read_races and reread the data 565 * from the backing device. 566 */ 567 if (ptr_stale(s->iop.c, k, 0)) { 568 if (PTR_BUCKET(b->c, k, 0)->invalidating) 569 goto retry; 570 571 atomic_dec(&PTR_BUCKET(s->iop.c, k, 0)->pin); 572 atomic_long_inc(&s->iop.c->cache_read_races); > 573 pr_warn("%pU cache read race count: %lu", s->iop.c->sb.set_uuid, 574 atomic_long_read(&s->iop.c->cache_read_races)); 575 576 n->bi_end_io = backing_request_endio; 577 n->bi_private = &s->cl; 578 579 /* I/O request sent to backing device */ 580 closure_bio_submit(s->iop.c, n, &s->cl); 581 return n == bio ? MAP_DONE : MAP_CONTINUE; 582 } 583 584 bio_key = &container_of(n, struct bbio, bio)->key; 585 bch_bkey_copy_single_ptr(bio_key, k, 0); 586 587 bch_cut_front(&KEY(s->iop.inode, n->bi_iter.bi_sector, 0), bio_key); 588 bch_cut_back(&KEY(s->iop.inode, bio_end_sector(n), 0), bio_key); 589 590 n->bi_end_io = bch_cache_read_endio; 591 n->bi_private = &s->cl; 592 593 /* 594 * The bucket we're reading from might be reused while our bio 595 * is in flight, and we could then end up reading the wrong 596 * data. 597 * 598 * We guard against this by checking (in cache_read_endio()) if 599 * the pointer is stale again; if so, we treat it as an error 600 * and reread from the backing device (but we don't pass that 601 * error up anywhere). 602 */ 603 604 __bch_submit_bbio(n, b->c); 605 return n == bio ? MAP_DONE : MAP_CONTINUE; 606 } 607 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] bcache: fix io error during cache read race 2024-11-19 3:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] bcache: fix io error during cache read race mingzhe.zou 2024-11-22 0:21 ` kernel test robot @ 2024-11-22 0:21 ` kernel test robot 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: kernel test robot @ 2024-11-22 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mingzhe.zou, colyli Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, linux-bcache, dongsheng.yang, zoumingzhe Hi, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on next-20241121] [also build test ERROR on v6.12] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/mingzhe-zou-easystack-cn/bcache-fix-io-error-during-cache-read-race/20241121-142652 base: next-20241121 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119032852.2511-2-mingzhe.zou%40easystack.cn patch subject: [PATCH 2/3] bcache: fix io error during cache read race config: arm-randconfig-001-20241122 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241122/202411220826.WbtAugHL-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241122/202411220826.WbtAugHL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411220826.WbtAugHL-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/md/bcache/request.c:573:55: error: no member named 'sb' in 'struct cache_set' 573 | pr_warn("%pU cache read race count: %lu", s->iop.c->sb.set_uuid, | ~~~~~~~~ ^ include/linux/printk.h:554:37: note: expanded from macro 'pr_warn' 554 | printk(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:501:60: note: expanded from macro 'printk' 501 | #define printk(fmt, ...) printk_index_wrap(_printk, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:473:19: note: expanded from macro 'printk_index_wrap' 473 | _p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ 1 error generated. vim +573 drivers/md/bcache/request.c 520 521 /* 522 * Read from a single key, handling the initial cache miss if the key starts in 523 * the middle of the bio 524 */ 525 static int cache_lookup_fn(struct btree_op *op, struct btree *b, struct bkey *k) 526 { 527 struct search *s = container_of(op, struct search, op); 528 struct bio *n, *bio = &s->bio.bio; 529 struct bkey *bio_key; 530 531 if (bkey_cmp(k, &KEY(s->iop.inode, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector, 0)) <= 0) 532 return MAP_CONTINUE; 533 534 if (KEY_INODE(k) != s->iop.inode || 535 KEY_START(k) > bio->bi_iter.bi_sector) { 536 unsigned int bio_sectors = bio_sectors(bio); 537 unsigned int sectors = KEY_INODE(k) == s->iop.inode 538 ? min_t(uint64_t, INT_MAX, 539 KEY_START(k) - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector) 540 : INT_MAX; 541 int ret = s->d->cache_miss(b, s, bio, sectors); 542 543 if (ret != MAP_CONTINUE) 544 return ret; 545 546 /* if this was a complete miss we shouldn't get here */ 547 BUG_ON(bio_sectors <= sectors); 548 } 549 550 if (!KEY_SIZE(k)) 551 return MAP_CONTINUE; 552 553 atomic_inc(&PTR_BUCKET(s->iop.c, k, 0)->pin); 554 555 PTR_BUCKET(b->c, k, 0)->prio = INITIAL_PRIO; 556 557 n = bio_next_split(bio, min_t(uint64_t, INT_MAX, 558 KEY_OFFSET(k) - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector), 559 GFP_NOIO, &s->d->bio_split); 560 561 retry: 562 /* 563 * If the bucket was reused while our bio was in flight, we might have 564 * read the wrong data. Set s->cache_read_races and reread the data 565 * from the backing device. 566 */ 567 if (ptr_stale(s->iop.c, k, 0)) { 568 if (PTR_BUCKET(b->c, k, 0)->invalidating) 569 goto retry; 570 571 atomic_dec(&PTR_BUCKET(s->iop.c, k, 0)->pin); 572 atomic_long_inc(&s->iop.c->cache_read_races); > 573 pr_warn("%pU cache read race count: %lu", s->iop.c->sb.set_uuid, 574 atomic_long_read(&s->iop.c->cache_read_races)); 575 576 n->bi_end_io = backing_request_endio; 577 n->bi_private = &s->cl; 578 579 /* I/O request sent to backing device */ 580 closure_bio_submit(s->iop.c, n, &s->cl); 581 return n == bio ? MAP_DONE : MAP_CONTINUE; 582 } 583 584 bio_key = &container_of(n, struct bbio, bio)->key; 585 bch_bkey_copy_single_ptr(bio_key, k, 0); 586 587 bch_cut_front(&KEY(s->iop.inode, n->bi_iter.bi_sector, 0), bio_key); 588 bch_cut_back(&KEY(s->iop.inode, bio_end_sector(n), 0), bio_key); 589 590 n->bi_end_io = bch_cache_read_endio; 591 n->bi_private = &s->cl; 592 593 /* 594 * The bucket we're reading from might be reused while our bio 595 * is in flight, and we could then end up reading the wrong 596 * data. 597 * 598 * We guard against this by checking (in cache_read_endio()) if 599 * the pointer is stale again; if so, we treat it as an error 600 * and reread from the backing device (but we don't pass that 601 * error up anywhere). 602 */ 603 604 __bch_submit_bbio(n, b->c); 605 return n == bio ? MAP_DONE : MAP_CONTINUE; 606 } 607 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] bcache: remove unused parameters 2024-11-19 3:28 [PATCH 1/3] bcache: avoid invalidating buckets in use mingzhe.zou 2024-11-19 3:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] bcache: fix io error during cache read race mingzhe.zou @ 2024-11-19 3:28 ` mingzhe.zou 2024-11-22 1:46 ` kernel test robot 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: mingzhe.zou @ 2024-11-19 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: colyli; +Cc: linux-bcache, dongsheng.yang, zoumingzhe From: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@easystack.cn> We have prevented the bucket in use from being reclaimed and reused. So, search->recoverable and search->read_dirty_data are unused. Moreover, we do not need to consider that the bucket is reused during cache reading. Signed-off-by: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@easystack.cn> --- drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 45 +------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c index 3e76ae687045..8cb22ab4a79a 100644 --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c @@ -484,9 +484,7 @@ struct search { struct bcache_device *d; unsigned int insert_bio_sectors; - unsigned int recoverable:1; unsigned int write:1; - unsigned int read_dirty_data:1; unsigned int cache_missed:1; struct block_device *orig_bdev; @@ -507,11 +505,6 @@ static void bch_cache_read_endio(struct bio *bio) if (bio->bi_status) s->iop.status = bio->bi_status; - else if (!KEY_DIRTY(&b->key) && - ptr_stale(s->iop.c, &b->key, 0)) { - atomic_long_inc(&s->iop.c->cache_read_races); - s->iop.status = BLK_STS_IOERR; - } bch_bbio_endio(s->iop.c, bio, bio->bi_status, "reading from cache"); } @@ -609,7 +602,6 @@ static CLOSURE_CALLBACK(cache_lookup) { closure_type(s, struct search, iop.cl); struct bio *bio = &s->bio.bio; - struct cached_dev *dc; int ret; bch_btree_op_init(&s->op, -1); @@ -633,12 +625,6 @@ static CLOSURE_CALLBACK(cache_lookup) */ if (ret < 0) { BUG_ON(ret == -EINTR); - if (s->d && s->d->c && - !UUID_FLASH_ONLY(&s->d->c->uuids[s->d->id])) { - dc = container_of(s->d, struct cached_dev, disk); - if (dc && atomic_read(&dc->has_dirty)) - s->recoverable = false; - } if (!s->iop.status) s->iop.status = BLK_STS_IOERR; } @@ -654,10 +640,7 @@ static void request_endio(struct bio *bio) if (bio->bi_status) { struct search *s = container_of(cl, struct search, cl); - s->iop.status = bio->bi_status; - /* Only cache read errors are recoverable */ - s->recoverable = false; } bio_put(bio); @@ -687,7 +670,6 @@ static void backing_request_endio(struct bio *bio) /* set to orig_bio->bi_status in bio_complete() */ s->iop.status = bio->bi_status; } - s->recoverable = false; /* should count I/O error for backing device here */ bch_count_backing_io_errors(dc, bio); } @@ -758,9 +740,7 @@ static inline struct search *search_alloc(struct bio *bio, s->cache_miss = NULL; s->cache_missed = 0; s->d = d; - s->recoverable = 1; s->write = op_is_write(bio_op(bio)); - s->read_dirty_data = 0; /* Count on the bcache device */ s->orig_bdev = orig_bdev; s->start_time = start_time; @@ -805,29 +785,6 @@ static CLOSURE_CALLBACK(cached_dev_read_error_done) static CLOSURE_CALLBACK(cached_dev_read_error) { - closure_type(s, struct search, cl); - struct bio *bio = &s->bio.bio; - - /* - * If read request hit dirty data (s->read_dirty_data is true), - * then recovery a failed read request from cached device may - * get a stale data back. So read failure recovery is only - * permitted when read request hit clean data in cache device, - * or when cache read race happened. - */ - if (s->recoverable && !s->read_dirty_data) { - /* Retry from the backing device: */ - trace_bcache_read_retry(s->orig_bio); - - s->iop.status = 0; - do_bio_hook(s, s->orig_bio, backing_request_endio); - - /* XXX: invalidate cache */ - - /* I/O request sent to backing device */ - closure_bio_submit(s->iop.c, bio, cl); - } - continue_at(cl, cached_dev_read_error_done, NULL); } @@ -873,7 +830,7 @@ static CLOSURE_CALLBACK(cached_dev_read_done) s->cache_miss = NULL; } - if (verify(dc) && s->recoverable && !s->read_dirty_data) + if (verify(dc)) bch_data_verify(dc, s->orig_bio); closure_get(&dc->disk.cl); -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] bcache: remove unused parameters 2024-11-19 3:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] bcache: remove unused parameters mingzhe.zou @ 2024-11-22 1:46 ` kernel test robot 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: kernel test robot @ 2024-11-22 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mingzhe.zou, colyli Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, linux-bcache, dongsheng.yang, zoumingzhe Hi, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on next-20241121] [also build test ERROR on v6.12] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/mingzhe-zou-easystack-cn/bcache-fix-io-error-during-cache-read-race/20241121-142652 base: next-20241121 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119032852.2511-3-mingzhe.zou%40easystack.cn patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] bcache: remove unused parameters config: arm-randconfig-001-20241122 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241122/202411220924.whVi5QoT-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241122/202411220924.whVi5QoT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411220924.whVi5QoT-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/md/bcache/request.c:566:55: error: no member named 'sb' in 'struct cache_set' 566 | pr_warn("%pU cache read race count: %lu", s->iop.c->sb.set_uuid, | ~~~~~~~~ ^ include/linux/printk.h:554:37: note: expanded from macro 'pr_warn' 554 | printk(KERN_WARNING pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:501:60: note: expanded from macro 'printk' 501 | #define printk(fmt, ...) printk_index_wrap(_printk, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/printk.h:473:19: note: expanded from macro 'printk_index_wrap' 473 | _p_func(_fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/md/bcache/request.c:788:14: error: use of undeclared identifier 'cl' 788 | continue_at(cl, cached_dev_read_error_done, NULL); | ^ >> drivers/md/bcache/request.c:788:14: error: use of undeclared identifier 'cl' 3 errors generated. vim +/cl +788 drivers/md/bcache/request.c cafe563591446cf Kent Overstreet 2013-03-23 785 d4e3b928ab487a8 Kent Overstreet 2023-11-17 786 static CLOSURE_CALLBACK(cached_dev_read_error) cafe563591446cf Kent Overstreet 2013-03-23 787 { 1568ee7e3c6305d Guoju Fang 2019-04-25 @788 continue_at(cl, cached_dev_read_error_done, NULL); 1568ee7e3c6305d Guoju Fang 2019-04-25 789 } 1568ee7e3c6305d Guoju Fang 2019-04-25 790 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-22 1:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-11-19 3:28 [PATCH 1/3] bcache: avoid invalidating buckets in use mingzhe.zou 2024-11-19 3:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] bcache: fix io error during cache read race mingzhe.zou 2024-11-22 0:21 ` kernel test robot 2024-11-22 0:21 ` kernel test robot 2024-11-19 3:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] bcache: remove unused parameters mingzhe.zou 2024-11-22 1:46 ` kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox