public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 6/6] blk-mq: manage hctx map via xarray
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 08:44:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <065432ee-7e1b-8c21-4536-2c4a7bb6734b@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220307064401.30056-7-ming.lei@redhat.com>

On 3/7/22 07:44, Ming Lei wrote:
> Firstly code becomes more clean by switching to xarray from plain array.
> 
> Secondly use-after-free on q->queue_hw_ctx can be fixed because
> queue_for_each_hw_ctx() may be run when updating nr_hw_queues is
> in-progress. With this patch, q->hctx_table is defined as xarray, and
> this structure will share same lifetime with request queue, so
> queue_for_each_hw_ctx() can use q->hctx_table to lookup hctx reliably.
> 
> Reported-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
>   block/blk-mq-tag.c     |  2 +-
>   block/blk-mq.c         | 55 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>   block/blk-mq.h         |  2 +-
>   include/linux/blk-mq.h |  3 +--
>   include/linux/blkdev.h |  2 +-
>   5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index 1850a4225e12..68ac23d0b640 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_tag_iter_fn *fn,
>   		void *priv)
>   {
>   	/*
> -	 * __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() updates nr_hw_queues and queue_hw_ctx
> +	 * __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() updates nr_hw_queues and hctx_table
>   	 * while the queue is frozen. So we can use q_usage_counter to avoid
>   	 * racing with it.
>   	 */
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index bffdd71c670d..a15d12fb227c 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ static int blk_mq_poll_stats_bkt(const struct request *rq)
>   static inline struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *blk_qc_to_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
>   		blk_qc_t qc)
>   {
> -	return q->queue_hw_ctx[(qc & ~BLK_QC_T_INTERNAL) >> BLK_QC_T_SHIFT];
> +	return xa_load(&q->hctx_table,
> +			(qc & ~BLK_QC_T_INTERNAL) >> BLK_QC_T_SHIFT);
>   }
>   
>   static inline struct request *blk_qc_to_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> @@ -573,7 +574,7 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
>   	 * If not tell the caller that it should skip this queue.
>   	 */
>   	ret = -EXDEV;
> -	data.hctx = q->queue_hw_ctx[hctx_idx];
> +	data.hctx = xa_load(&q->hctx_table, hctx_idx);
>   	if (!blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(data.hctx))
>   		goto out_queue_exit;
>   	cpu = cpumask_first_and(data.hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
> @@ -3437,6 +3438,8 @@ static void blk_mq_exit_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
>   
>   	blk_mq_remove_cpuhp(hctx);
>   
> +	xa_erase(&q->hctx_table, hctx_idx);
> +
>   	spin_lock(&q->unused_hctx_lock);
>   	list_add(&hctx->hctx_list, &q->unused_hctx_list);
>   	spin_unlock(&q->unused_hctx_lock);
> @@ -3476,8 +3479,15 @@ static int blk_mq_init_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
>   	if (blk_mq_init_request(set, hctx->fq->flush_rq, hctx_idx,
>   				hctx->numa_node))
>   		goto exit_hctx;
> +
> +	if (xa_insert(&q->hctx_table, hctx_idx, hctx, GFP_KERNEL))
> +		goto exit_flush_rq;
> +
>   	return 0;
>    > + exit_flush_rq:
> +	if (set->ops->exit_request)
> +		set->ops->exit_request(set, hctx->fq->flush_rq, hctx_idx);

Why is this here? It's not directly related to the xarray conversion, so 
it should rather go into a separate patch.

>    exit_hctx:
>   	if (set->ops->exit_hctx)
>   		set->ops->exit_hctx(hctx, hctx_idx);
> @@ -3856,7 +3866,7 @@ void blk_mq_release(struct request_queue *q)
>   		kobject_put(&hctx->kobj);
>   	}
>   
> -	kfree(q->queue_hw_ctx);
> +	xa_destroy(&q->hctx_table);
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * release .mq_kobj and sw queue's kobject now because
> @@ -3946,45 +3956,28 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>   						struct request_queue *q)
>   {
>   	int i, j, end;
> -	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx **hctxs = q->queue_hw_ctx;
> -
> -	if (q->nr_hw_queues < set->nr_hw_queues) {
> -		struct blk_mq_hw_ctx **new_hctxs;
> -
> -		new_hctxs = kcalloc_node(set->nr_hw_queues,
> -				       sizeof(*new_hctxs), GFP_KERNEL,
> -				       set->numa_node);
> -		if (!new_hctxs)
> -			return;
> -		if (hctxs)
> -			memcpy(new_hctxs, hctxs, q->nr_hw_queues *
> -			       sizeof(*hctxs));
> -		q->queue_hw_ctx = new_hctxs;
> -		kfree(hctxs);
> -		hctxs = new_hctxs;
> -	}
>   
>   	/* protect against switching io scheduler  */
>   	mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
>   	for (i = 0; i < set->nr_hw_queues; i++) {
>   		int old_node;
>   		int node = blk_mq_get_hctx_node(set, i);
> -		struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *old_hctx = hctxs[i];
> +		struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *old_hctx = xa_load(&q->hctx_table, i);
>   
>   		if (old_hctx) {
>   			old_node = old_hctx->numa_node;
>   			blk_mq_exit_hctx(q, set, old_hctx, i);
>   		}
>   
> -		hctxs[i] = blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx(set, q, i, node);
> -		if (!hctxs[i]) {
> +		if (!blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx(set, q, i, node)) {
> +			struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> +
>   			if (!old_hctx)
>   				break;
>   			pr_warn("Allocate new hctx on node %d fails, fallback to previous one on node %d\n",
>   					node, old_node);
> -			hctxs[i] = blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx(set, q, i,
> -					old_node);
> -			WARN_ON_ONCE(!hctxs[i]);
> +			hctx = blk_mq_alloc_and_init_hctx(set, q, i, old_node);
> +			WARN_ON_ONCE(!hctx);
>   		}
>   	}
>   	/*
> @@ -4001,12 +3994,10 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>   	}
>   
>   	for (; j < end; j++) {
> -		struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = hctxs[j];
> +		struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = xa_load(&q->hctx_table, j);
>   
> -		if (hctx) {
> +		if (hctx)
>   			blk_mq_exit_hctx(q, set, hctx, j);
> -			hctxs[j] = NULL;
> -		}

Do you need to call 'xa_load' here? Isn't it sufficient to call
blk_mq_exit_hctx() and have it skip any non-present entries?

>   	}
>   	mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
>   }
> @@ -4046,6 +4037,8 @@ int blk_mq_init_allocated_queue(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->unused_hctx_list);
>   	spin_lock_init(&q->unused_hctx_lock);
>   
> +	xa_init(&q->hctx_table);
> +
>   	blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(set, q);
>   	if (!q->nr_hw_queues)
>   		goto err_hctxs;
> @@ -4075,7 +4068,7 @@ int blk_mq_init_allocated_queue(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>   	return 0;
>   
>   err_hctxs:
> -	kfree(q->queue_hw_ctx);
> +	xa_destroy(&q->hctx_table);
>   	q->nr_hw_queues = 0;
>   	blk_mq_sysfs_deinit(q);
>   err_poll:
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
> index 948791ea2a3e..2615bd58bad3 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.h
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static inline struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *blk_mq_map_queue_type(struct request_queue *
>   							  enum hctx_type type,
>   							  unsigned int cpu)
>   {
> -	return q->queue_hw_ctx[q->tag_set->map[type].mq_map[cpu]];
> +	return xa_load(&q->hctx_table, q->tag_set->map[type].mq_map[cpu]);
>   }
>   
>   static inline enum hctx_type blk_mq_get_hctx_type(unsigned int flags)
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> index 3a41d50b85d3..7aa5c54901a9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> @@ -917,8 +917,7 @@ static inline void *blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(struct request *rq)
>   }
>   
>   #define queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i)				\
> -	for ((i) = 0; (i) < (q)->nr_hw_queues &&			\
> -	     ({ hctx = (q)->queue_hw_ctx[i]; 1; }); (i)++)
> +	xa_for_each(&(q)->hctx_table, (i), (hctx))
>   
>   #define hctx_for_each_ctx(hctx, ctx, i)					\
>   	for ((i) = 0; (i) < (hctx)->nr_ctx &&				\
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index f757f9c2871f..a53ae40aaded 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ struct request_queue {
>   	unsigned int		queue_depth;
>   
>   	/* hw dispatch queues */
> -	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx	**queue_hw_ctx;
> +	struct xarray		hctx_table;
>   	unsigned int		nr_hw_queues;
>   
>   	/*

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		           Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-07  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-07  6:43 [PATCH V3 0/6] blk-mq: update_nr_hw_queues related improvement & bugfix Ming Lei
2022-03-07  6:43 ` [PATCH V3 1/6] blk-mq: figure out correct numa node for hw queue Ming Lei
2022-03-07  7:34   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-07  6:43 ` [PATCH V3 2/6] blk-mq: simplify reallocation of hw ctxs a bit Ming Lei
2022-03-07  7:35   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-07  6:43 ` [PATCH V3 3/6] blk-mq: reconfigure poll after queue map is changed Ming Lei
2022-03-07  7:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-07  7:36   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-07  6:43 ` [PATCH V3 4/6] block: mtip32xx: don't touch q->queue_hw_ctx Ming Lei
2022-03-07  7:36   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-07  6:44 ` [PATCH V3 5/6] blk-mq: prepare for implementing hctx table via xarray Ming Lei
2022-03-07  7:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-07  7:38   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-07  6:44 ` [PATCH V3 6/6] blk-mq: manage hctx map " Ming Lei
2022-03-07  7:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-07  7:44     ` Ming Lei
2022-03-07  7:44   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2022-03-07  7:49     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=065432ee-7e1b-8c21-4536-2c4a7bb6734b@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox