Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: always return block size in LOOP_GET_STATUS
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:47:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170818074700.GH2459@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f01f907-0443-4961-d4fd-a5a3ffe8e688@suse.de>

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:43:19AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 08/18/2017 09:38 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:18:52AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> On 08/18/2017 08:15 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> >>> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> >>>
> >>> When I was writing a test for the new loop device block size
> >>> functionality, I realized that the interface is kind of dumb:
> >>>
> >>> - lo_init[0] is never filled in with the logical block size we
> >>>   previously set
> >>> - lo_flags returned from LOOP_GET_STATUS will have LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE
> >>>   set if we previously called LOOP_SET_STATUS with LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE
> >>>   set, which doesn't really mean anything
> >>>
> >>> Instead, for LOOP_GET_STATUS, let's always fill in lo_init[0] and set
> >>> the LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE flag to indicate we support it.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/block/loop.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> >>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >> Phew. 'Dumb interface'.
> >> 'tis wasn't me who designed the interface;
> >> Backwards compability are the watchwords here.
> >> Personally, I would have loved to design a new interface.
> >>
> >> I've got quite some flak for daring to break existing interfaces, most
> >> notably setting logical and physical blocksize per default (which I
> >> would _love_ to have done, seeing that it really makes sense here).
> >> But as this would change the behaviour I've gone through pains (and
> >> several _years_ of iterations) to get this sorted.
> >>
> >> So if you  design a blocktest for that ensure that
> >> a) the sysfs attributes before and after the patch are _identical_
> >> b) the sysfs attributes will only change if the 'LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE'
> >> flag has been set
> >> and
> >> c) validate the written blocksizes; this is required to be able to
> >> install bootloaders there
> >>
> >> This whole interface was designed such that you can prepare bootable
> >> diskimages for S/390 DASDs, which use a native 4k blocksize.
> > 
> > Hi, Hannes,
> > 
> > Wasn't insulting you at all, the only part of the interface I'm
> > complaining about is LOOP_GET_STATUS missing information :)
> > 
> Sure. Just saying.
> But please make sure only to return that information if the
> LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE flag is set; otherwise there's a rick of confusing
> losetup.

I actually checked losetup, it works just fine with LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE
always set and lo_init[0] always filled in.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-18  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-18  6:15 [PATCH 0/2] loop: LOOP_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE fixes Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18  6:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] loop: always return block size in LOOP_GET_STATUS Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18  7:18   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-08-18  7:38     ` Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18  7:43       ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-08-18  7:47         ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2017-08-18  7:56           ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-08-18  8:05             ` Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18  8:12               ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-08-18  8:22                 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18  9:22                   ` Karel Zak
2017-08-18 16:44                     ` Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18 17:25                       ` Karel Zak
2017-08-18  9:39                   ` Karel Zak
2017-08-18  6:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] loop: fix hang if LOOP_SET_STATUS gets invalid blocksize or encrypt type Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18  7:20   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-08-18  6:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] loop: LOOP_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE fixes Omar Sandoval

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170818074700.GH2459@vader \
    --to=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox