From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: always return block size in LOOP_GET_STATUS
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:47:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170818074700.GH2459@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f01f907-0443-4961-d4fd-a5a3ffe8e688@suse.de>
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:43:19AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 08/18/2017 09:38 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:18:52AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> On 08/18/2017 08:15 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> >>> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> >>>
> >>> When I was writing a test for the new loop device block size
> >>> functionality, I realized that the interface is kind of dumb:
> >>>
> >>> - lo_init[0] is never filled in with the logical block size we
> >>> previously set
> >>> - lo_flags returned from LOOP_GET_STATUS will have LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE
> >>> set if we previously called LOOP_SET_STATUS with LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE
> >>> set, which doesn't really mean anything
> >>>
> >>> Instead, for LOOP_GET_STATUS, let's always fill in lo_init[0] and set
> >>> the LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE flag to indicate we support it.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/block/loop.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> >>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >> Phew. 'Dumb interface'.
> >> 'tis wasn't me who designed the interface;
> >> Backwards compability are the watchwords here.
> >> Personally, I would have loved to design a new interface.
> >>
> >> I've got quite some flak for daring to break existing interfaces, most
> >> notably setting logical and physical blocksize per default (which I
> >> would _love_ to have done, seeing that it really makes sense here).
> >> But as this would change the behaviour I've gone through pains (and
> >> several _years_ of iterations) to get this sorted.
> >>
> >> So if you design a blocktest for that ensure that
> >> a) the sysfs attributes before and after the patch are _identical_
> >> b) the sysfs attributes will only change if the 'LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE'
> >> flag has been set
> >> and
> >> c) validate the written blocksizes; this is required to be able to
> >> install bootloaders there
> >>
> >> This whole interface was designed such that you can prepare bootable
> >> diskimages for S/390 DASDs, which use a native 4k blocksize.
> >
> > Hi, Hannes,
> >
> > Wasn't insulting you at all, the only part of the interface I'm
> > complaining about is LOOP_GET_STATUS missing information :)
> >
> Sure. Just saying.
> But please make sure only to return that information if the
> LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE flag is set; otherwise there's a rick of confusing
> losetup.
I actually checked losetup, it works just fine with LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE
always set and lo_init[0] always filled in.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-18 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-18 6:15 [PATCH 0/2] loop: LOOP_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE fixes Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18 6:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] loop: always return block size in LOOP_GET_STATUS Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18 7:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-08-18 7:38 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18 7:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-08-18 7:47 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2017-08-18 7:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-08-18 8:05 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18 8:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-08-18 8:22 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18 9:22 ` Karel Zak
2017-08-18 16:44 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18 17:25 ` Karel Zak
2017-08-18 9:39 ` Karel Zak
2017-08-18 6:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] loop: fix hang if LOOP_SET_STATUS gets invalid blocksize or encrypt type Omar Sandoval
2017-08-18 7:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-08-18 6:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] loop: LOOP_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE fixes Omar Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170818074700.GH2459@vader \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox