From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: avoid to hold host-wide counter of host_busy for scsi_mq
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 14:57:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180420065742.8043-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180420065742.8043-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
It isn't necessary to check the host depth in scsi_queue_rq() any more
since it has been respected by blk-mq before calling scsi_queue_rq() via
getting driver tag.
Lots of LUNs may attach to same host, and per-host IOPS may reach millions
level, so we should avoid to this expensive atomic operations on the
hostwide counter in IO path.
This patch implemens scsi_host_busy() via blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() for
reading the count of busy IOs for scsi_mq.
It is observed that IOPS is increased by 15% in IO test on scsi_debug
(32 LUNs, 32 submit queues, 1024 can_queue, libaio/dio) in one
dual-socket system.
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Cc: James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Cc: Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>
Cc: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
drivers/scsi/hosts.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
index 69beb30205f1..ad56e2b10ac8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
@@ -564,13 +564,35 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_get(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_host_get);
+struct scsi_host_mq_in_flight {
+ int cnt;
+};
+
+static void scsi_host_check_in_flight(struct request *rq, void *data,
+ bool reserved)
+{
+ struct scsi_host_mq_in_flight *in_flight = data;
+
+ if (blk_mq_request_started(rq))
+ in_flight->cnt++;
+}
+
/**
* scsi_host_busy - Return the host busy counter
* @shost: Pointer to Scsi_Host to inc.
**/
int scsi_host_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
{
- return atomic_read(&shost->host_busy);
+ struct scsi_host_mq_in_flight in_flight = {
+ .cnt = 0,
+ };
+
+ if (!shost->use_blk_mq)
+ return atomic_read(&shost->host_busy);
+
+ blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&shost->tag_set, scsi_host_check_in_flight,
+ &in_flight);
+ return in_flight.cnt;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_host_busy);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 0dfec0dedd5e..dc437c642934 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ static void scsi_dec_host_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
unsigned long flags;
rcu_read_lock();
- atomic_dec(&shost->host_busy);
+ if (!shost->use_blk_mq)
+ atomic_dec(&shost->host_busy);
if (unlikely(scsi_host_in_recovery(shost))) {
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
if (shost->host_failed || shost->host_eh_scheduled)
@@ -444,7 +445,12 @@ static inline bool scsi_target_is_busy(struct scsi_target *starget)
static inline bool scsi_host_is_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
{
- if (shost->can_queue > 0 &&
+ /*
+ * blk-mq can handle host queue busy efficiently via host-wide driver
+ * tag allocation
+ */
+
+ if (!shost->use_blk_mq && shost->can_queue > 0 &&
atomic_read(&shost->host_busy) >= shost->can_queue)
return true;
if (atomic_read(&shost->host_blocked) > 0)
@@ -1539,9 +1545,12 @@ static inline int scsi_host_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
if (scsi_host_in_recovery(shost))
return 0;
- busy = atomic_inc_return(&shost->host_busy) - 1;
+ if (!shost->use_blk_mq)
+ busy = atomic_inc_return(&shost->host_busy) - 1;
+ else
+ busy = 0;
if (atomic_read(&shost->host_blocked) > 0) {
- if (busy)
+ if (busy || scsi_host_busy(shost))
goto starved;
/*
@@ -1555,7 +1564,7 @@ static inline int scsi_host_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
"unblocking host at zero depth\n"));
}
- if (shost->can_queue > 0 && busy >= shost->can_queue)
+ if (!shost->use_blk_mq && shost->can_queue > 0 && busy >= shost->can_queue)
goto starved;
if (shost->host_self_blocked)
goto starved;
@@ -1641,7 +1650,9 @@ static void scsi_kill_request(struct request *req, struct request_queue *q)
* with the locks as normal issue path does.
*/
atomic_inc(&sdev->device_busy);
- atomic_inc(&shost->host_busy);
+
+ if (!shost->use_blk_mq)
+ atomic_inc(&shost->host_busy);
if (starget->can_queue > 0)
atomic_inc(&starget->target_busy);
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-20 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-20 6:57 [PATCH 0/3] scsi: scsi-mq: don't hold host_busy in IO path Ming Lei
2018-04-20 6:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi: introduce scsi_host_busy() Ming Lei
2018-04-27 15:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-20 6:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: read host_busy via scsi_host_busy() Ming Lei
2018-04-27 15:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-28 8:17 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-20 6:57 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-04-27 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: avoid to hold host-wide counter of host_busy for scsi_mq Bart Van Assche
2018-04-28 8:26 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-27 15:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] scsi: scsi-mq: don't hold host_busy in IO path Bart Van Assche
2018-04-27 15:39 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-27 15:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-27 15:55 ` Laurence Oberman
2018-04-27 16:19 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-28 8:47 ` Ming Lei
2018-06-22 15:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-06-22 21:43 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180420065742.8043-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox