public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>,
	Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: avoid to hold host-wide counter of host_busy for scsi_mq
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 14:57:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180420065742.8043-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180420065742.8043-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

It isn't necessary to check the host depth in scsi_queue_rq() any more
since it has been respected by blk-mq before calling scsi_queue_rq() via
getting driver tag.

Lots of LUNs may attach to same host, and per-host IOPS may reach millions
level, so we should avoid to this expensive atomic operations on the
hostwide counter in IO path.

This patch implemens scsi_host_busy() via blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() for
reading the count of busy IOs for scsi_mq.

It is observed that IOPS is increased by 15% in IO test on scsi_debug
(32 LUNs, 32 submit queues, 1024 can_queue, libaio/dio) in one
dual-socket system.

Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Cc: James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Cc: Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com>
Cc: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/hosts.c    | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
index 69beb30205f1..ad56e2b10ac8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
@@ -564,13 +564,35 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_get(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_host_get);
 
+struct scsi_host_mq_in_flight {
+	int cnt;
+};
+
+static void scsi_host_check_in_flight(struct request *rq, void *data,
+		bool reserved)
+{
+	struct scsi_host_mq_in_flight *in_flight = data;
+
+	if (blk_mq_request_started(rq))
+		in_flight->cnt++;
+}
+
 /**
  * scsi_host_busy - Return the host busy counter
  * @shost:	Pointer to Scsi_Host to inc.
  **/
 int scsi_host_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
 {
-	return atomic_read(&shost->host_busy);
+	struct scsi_host_mq_in_flight in_flight = {
+		.cnt = 0,
+	};
+
+	if (!shost->use_blk_mq)
+		return atomic_read(&shost->host_busy);
+
+	blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&shost->tag_set, scsi_host_check_in_flight,
+			&in_flight);
+	return in_flight.cnt;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_host_busy);
 
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 0dfec0dedd5e..dc437c642934 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ static void scsi_dec_host_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	atomic_dec(&shost->host_busy);
+	if (!shost->use_blk_mq)
+		atomic_dec(&shost->host_busy);
 	if (unlikely(scsi_host_in_recovery(shost))) {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
 		if (shost->host_failed || shost->host_eh_scheduled)
@@ -444,7 +445,12 @@ static inline bool scsi_target_is_busy(struct scsi_target *starget)
 
 static inline bool scsi_host_is_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
 {
-	if (shost->can_queue > 0 &&
+	/*
+	 * blk-mq can handle host queue busy efficiently via host-wide driver
+	 * tag allocation
+	 */
+
+	if (!shost->use_blk_mq && shost->can_queue > 0 &&
 	    atomic_read(&shost->host_busy) >= shost->can_queue)
 		return true;
 	if (atomic_read(&shost->host_blocked) > 0)
@@ -1539,9 +1545,12 @@ static inline int scsi_host_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
 	if (scsi_host_in_recovery(shost))
 		return 0;
 
-	busy = atomic_inc_return(&shost->host_busy) - 1;
+	if (!shost->use_blk_mq)
+		busy = atomic_inc_return(&shost->host_busy) - 1;
+	else
+		busy = 0;
 	if (atomic_read(&shost->host_blocked) > 0) {
-		if (busy)
+		if (busy || scsi_host_busy(shost))
 			goto starved;
 
 		/*
@@ -1555,7 +1564,7 @@ static inline int scsi_host_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
 				     "unblocking host at zero depth\n"));
 	}
 
-	if (shost->can_queue > 0 && busy >= shost->can_queue)
+	if (!shost->use_blk_mq && shost->can_queue > 0 && busy >= shost->can_queue)
 		goto starved;
 	if (shost->host_self_blocked)
 		goto starved;
@@ -1641,7 +1650,9 @@ static void scsi_kill_request(struct request *req, struct request_queue *q)
 	 * with the locks as normal issue path does.
 	 */
 	atomic_inc(&sdev->device_busy);
-	atomic_inc(&shost->host_busy);
+
+	if (!shost->use_blk_mq)
+		atomic_inc(&shost->host_busy);
 	if (starget->can_queue > 0)
 		atomic_inc(&starget->target_busy);
 
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-20  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-20  6:57 [PATCH 0/3] scsi: scsi-mq: don't hold host_busy in IO path Ming Lei
2018-04-20  6:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi: introduce scsi_host_busy() Ming Lei
2018-04-27 15:47   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-20  6:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: read host_busy via scsi_host_busy() Ming Lei
2018-04-27 15:51   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-28  8:17     ` Ming Lei
2018-04-20  6:57 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-04-27 16:16   ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: avoid to hold host-wide counter of host_busy for scsi_mq Bart Van Assche
2018-04-28  8:26     ` Ming Lei
2018-04-27 15:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] scsi: scsi-mq: don't hold host_busy in IO path Bart Van Assche
2018-04-27 15:39   ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-27 15:48     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-27 15:55       ` Laurence Oberman
2018-04-27 16:19       ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-28  8:47     ` Ming Lei
2018-06-22 15:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-06-22 21:43   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180420065742.8043-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox