public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"don.brace@microsemi.com" <don.brace@microsemi.com>,
	"james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com"
	<james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	"osandov@fb.com" <osandov@fb.com>,
	"loberman@redhat.com" <loberman@redhat.com>,
	"kashyap.desai@broadcom.com" <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: avoid to hold host-wide counter of host_busy for scsi_mq
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 16:26:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180428082638.GB7325@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf84baf9bd61fd1a3ab34aa956d496d164aef44f.camel@wdc.com>

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 04:16:48PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 14:57 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > +struct scsi_host_mq_in_flight {
> > +	int cnt;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void scsi_host_check_in_flight(struct request *rq, void *data,
> > +		bool reserved)
> > +{
> > +	struct scsi_host_mq_in_flight *in_flight = data;
> > +
> > +	if (blk_mq_request_started(rq))
> > +		in_flight->cnt++;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * scsi_host_busy - Return the host busy counter
> >   * @shost:	Pointer to Scsi_Host to inc.
> >   **/
> >  int scsi_host_busy(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> >  {
> > -	return atomic_read(&shost->host_busy);
> > +	struct scsi_host_mq_in_flight in_flight = {
> > +		.cnt = 0,
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	if (!shost->use_blk_mq)
> > +		return atomic_read(&shost->host_busy);
> > +
> > +	blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(&shost->tag_set, scsi_host_check_in_flight,
> > +			&in_flight);
> > +	return in_flight.cnt;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_host_busy);
> 
> This patch introduces a subtle behavior change that has not been explained
> in the commit message. If a SCSI request gets requeued that results in a
> decrease of the .host_busy counter by scsi_device_unbusy() before the request
> is requeued and an increase of the host_busy counter when scsi_queue_rq() is
> called again. During that time such requests have the state MQ_RQ_COMPLETE and
> hence blk_mq_request_started() will return true and scsi_host_check_in_flight()

No, __blk_mq_requeue_request() will change the rq state into MQ_RQ_IDLE,
so such issue you worried about, please look at scsi_mq_requeue_cmd(),
which calls blk_mq_requeue_request(), which puts driver tag and updates
rq's state to IDLE.

> will include these requests. In other words, this patch introduces a subtle
> behavior change that has not been explained in the commit message. Hence I'm
> doubt that this change is correct.

As I explained above, no such issue.


Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-28  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-20  6:57 [PATCH 0/3] scsi: scsi-mq: don't hold host_busy in IO path Ming Lei
2018-04-20  6:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi: introduce scsi_host_busy() Ming Lei
2018-04-27 15:47   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-20  6:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: read host_busy via scsi_host_busy() Ming Lei
2018-04-27 15:51   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-28  8:17     ` Ming Lei
2018-04-20  6:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: avoid to hold host-wide counter of host_busy for scsi_mq Ming Lei
2018-04-27 16:16   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-28  8:26     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-04-27 15:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] scsi: scsi-mq: don't hold host_busy in IO path Bart Van Assche
2018-04-27 15:39   ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-27 15:48     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-04-27 15:55       ` Laurence Oberman
2018-04-27 16:19       ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-28  8:47     ` Ming Lei
2018-06-22 15:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-06-22 21:43   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180428082638.GB7325@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox