From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] nvme: pci: simplify timeout handling
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 15:27:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180502072709.GF22363@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eee63159-aae9-1936-008d-024dce13a69b@oracle.com>
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 01:12:57PM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
> Hi Ming
>
> On 05/02/2018 12:54 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> We need to return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER in nvme_timeout then:
> >> 1. defer the completion. we can't unmap the io request before close the controller totally, so not BLK_EH_HANDLED.
> >> 2. nvme_cancel_request could complete it. blk_mq_complete_request is invoked by nvme_cancel_request, so not BLK_EH_NOT_HANDLED.
> > We don't need to change return value of .timeout() any more after
> > calling nvme_quiesce_timeout():
> >
> > Thanks the single EH kthread, once nvme_quiesce_timeout() returns, all
> > timed-out requests have been handled already. Some of them may be completed,
> > and others may be handled as RESET_TIMER, but none of them are handled as
> > NOT_HANDLED because nvme_timeout() won't return that value.
> >
> > So the following blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(nvme_cancel_request) can handle
> > all in-flight requests because timeout is drained and quiesced.
>
> The key point here is we cannot unmap the io requests before we close the controller directly.
> The nvme controller may still hold the command after we complete and unmap the io request in nvme_timeout.
> This will cause memory corruption.
>
> So we cannot just schedule the eh recovery kthread then return BLK_EH_HANDLED.
> We need to deffer the completion of timeout requests until the controller has been closed totally in nvme_dev_disable.
>
Good catch!
I am gonna document this point since it is easy to be ignored.
Yeah, looks it is simpler to return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER for NVMe to
handle this issue, but not too readable, it is something like:
we has stopped the timeout, but BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER still has to be
returned for asking block layer to not complete this req.
So IMO it may be better to return BLK_EH_NOT_HANDLED, but it becomes
a bit tricky to handle this request in EH thread, maybe a NVMe req
flag is needed for completing the req in nvme_cancel_request().
Thanks
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-02 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-29 15:41 [PATCH V2 0/5] nvme: pci: fix & improve timeout handling Ming Lei
2018-04-29 15:41 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] block: introduce blk_quiesce_timeout() and blk_unquiesce_timeout() Ming Lei
2018-05-02 2:23 ` jianchao.wang
2018-05-02 3:33 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-02 5:16 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-29 15:41 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] nvme: pci: cover timeout for admin commands running in EH Ming Lei
2018-04-29 15:41 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] nvme: pci: only wait freezing if queue is frozen Ming Lei
2018-04-29 15:41 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] nvme: fix race between freeze queues and unfreeze queues Ming Lei
2018-04-29 15:41 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] nvme: pci: simplify timeout handling Ming Lei
2018-05-02 2:23 ` jianchao.wang
2018-05-02 4:54 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-02 5:12 ` jianchao.wang
2018-05-02 7:27 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180502072709.GF22363@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox