From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Matias Bjorling <matias.bjorling@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Fix sd_zbc_check_zones() error checks
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:09:44 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181011070952.13248-4-damien.lemoal@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181011070952.13248-1-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
The 32 bits overflow check for the zone size value is already done
within sd_zbc_check_zones() with the test:
} else if (logical_to_sectors(sdkp->device, zone_blocks) > UINT_MAX) {
so there is no need to check again for an out of range value in
sd_zbc_read_zones(). Simplify the code and fix sd_zbc_check_zones()
error return to -EFBIG instead of -ENODEV if the zone size is too large.
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c | 15 ++++++---------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c b/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c
index ca73c46931c0..44b64b4a922a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static int sd_zbc_check_zoned_characteristics(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
* Returns the zone size in number of blocks upon success or an error code
* upon failure.
*/
-static s64 sd_zbc_check_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
+static s32 sd_zbc_check_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
{
u64 zone_blocks = 0;
sector_t max_lba, block = 0;
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static s64 sd_zbc_check_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
if (sdkp->first_scan)
sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp,
"Zone size too large\n");
- ret = -ENODEV;
+ ret = -EFBIG;
} else {
ret = zone_blocks;
}
@@ -668,8 +668,7 @@ static int sd_zbc_setup(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, u32 zone_blocks)
int sd_zbc_read_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buf)
{
- int64_t zone_blocks;
- int ret;
+ int ret, zone_blocks;
if (!sd_is_zoned(sdkp))
/*
@@ -688,12 +687,10 @@ int sd_zbc_read_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buf)
* an eventual last runt zone) that is a power of 2 are supported.
*/
zone_blocks = sd_zbc_check_zones(sdkp);
- ret = -EFBIG;
- if (zone_blocks != (u32)zone_blocks)
- goto err;
- ret = zone_blocks;
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (zone_blocks < 0) {
+ ret = zone_blocks;
goto err;
+ }
/* The drive satisfies the kernel restrictions: set it up */
ret = sd_zbc_setup(sdkp, zone_blocks);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-11 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-11 7:09 [PATCH v2 00/11] Zoned block device support improvements Damien Le Moal
2018-10-11 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Rearrange code Damien Le Moal
2018-10-11 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] scsi: sd_zbc: Reduce boot device scan and revalidate time Damien Le Moal
2018-10-11 7:09 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2018-10-11 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] block: Introduce blkdev_nr_zones() helper Damien Le Moal
2018-10-11 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] block: Limit allocation of zone descriptors for report zones Damien Le Moal
2018-10-11 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] block: Introduce BLKGETZONESZ ioctl Damien Le Moal
2018-10-11 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] block: Introduce BLKGETNRZONES ioctl Damien Le Moal
2018-10-11 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] block: Improve zone reset execution Damien Le Moal
2018-10-11 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] block: Expose queue nr_zones in sysfs Damien Le Moal
2018-10-11 14:42 ` Ewan D. Milne
2018-10-12 0:41 ` Damien Le Moal
2018-10-11 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] block: add a report_zones method Damien Le Moal
2018-10-11 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] block: Introduce blk_revalidate_disk_zones() Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181011070952.13248-4-damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--to=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=matias.bjorling@wdc.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox