From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
jianchao wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH V4 3/7] blk-mq: quiesce queue before updating nr_hw_queues
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:43:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190404084320.24681-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190404084320.24681-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Inside __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(), only request queues are frozen
before updating nr_hw_queues.
However, even though blk_mq_freeze_queue() is returned, there might be
run queue activity not completed, then use-after-free may be triggered
on hctx and its fields.
Fix this issue by really quiescing queue via blk_mq_quiesce_queue() and
blk_sync_queue() for making sure no any run queue activity pending
before releasing hctx.
Cc: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Cc: Martin K . Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Cc: James E . J . Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cc: jianchao wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index b512ba0cb359..41c12d9008b7 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -3224,8 +3224,11 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
if (nr_hw_queues < 1 || nr_hw_queues == set->nr_hw_queues)
return;
- list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
+ list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
+ blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
+ blk_sync_queue(q);
+ }
/*
* Sync with blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter.
*/
@@ -3269,8 +3272,10 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
blk_mq_elv_switch_back(&head, q);
- list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
+ list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
+ blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
+ }
}
void blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int nr_hw_queues)
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-04 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-04 8:43 [PATCH V4 0/7] blk-mq: fix races related with freeing queue Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 1/7] blk-mq: grab .q_usage_counter when queuing request from plug code path Ming Lei
2019-04-04 15:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-04 20:45 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-04 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-04-05 9:26 ` Dongli Zhang
2019-04-05 13:52 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 2/7] blk-mq: move cancel of requeue_work into blk_mq_release Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-04-04 15:57 ` [PATCH V4 3/7] blk-mq: quiesce queue before updating nr_hw_queues Bart Van Assche
2019-04-04 20:55 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-08 3:16 ` jianchao.wang
2019-04-08 9:01 ` Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 4/7] blk-mq: free hw queue's resource in hctx's release handler Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 5/7] blk-mq: move cancel of hctx->run_work into blk_mq_hw_sysfs_release Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 6/7] block: don't drain in-progress dispatch in blk_cleanup_queue() Ming Lei
2019-04-04 8:43 ` [PATCH V4 7/7] SCSI: don't hold device refcount in IO path Ming Lei
2019-04-04 17:14 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190404084320.24681-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox